Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 101 - 107, 31.07.2022

Abstract

References

  • Akman H and Karaduman Y, (2021). Evaluating technological quality of cultivated Triticum species, interspecific, and intergeneric hybrids for wheat-based products and breeding programs. Journal of Cereal Science. 99,103188. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103188
  • Avcı S, (2010). Collection of wild sainfoin (Onobrychis sp.) species of Turkey and determination of their morphological characteristics, Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University
  • Avcı S, Ilhan E, Erayman M and Sancak C, (2014). Analysis of onobrychis genetic diversity using SSR markers from related legume species. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24(2):556-566
  • Beyaz R, (2014). Determination of salt tolerance of different sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) ecotypes and improvement of new sainfoin lines via in vitro mutagenesis technique. Ankara University, Institute of Biotechnology, Master Thesis, 382402
  • Beyaz R, (2019). Biochemical responses of shoot and root tissues of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) to NaCl-salt stress under in vitro conditions. Turkish Journal of AgricultureFood Science and Technology, 7(1):110-114. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v7i1.110-114.2177
  • Deb G, Sultana S, Bhuiyan MSU, Sarker KK and Papry AS, (2019). In vitro plant regeneration of wild eggplant (Solanum sisymbriifolium) to produce large number of rootstocks for tomato grafting. Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics. pp 65. doi:10.5455/ jabet.2019.d27
  • Ergül A, Khabbazi SD, Oğuz MÇ, Özmen CY, Gürel S and Gürel E, (2018). In vitro multiplication of wild relatives in genus Beta conserves the invaluable threatened germplasms. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 134(1):169- 175. doi:10.1007/s11240-018-1410-0
  • Erişen S, (2005). Yonca Medicago sativa L.’da somatik embriyogenesis aracılığıyla bitki rejenerasyonu. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 11(3):311-315. (in Turkish)
  • Garshasbi H, Omidi M, Torabi S and Davodi D, (2012). The study of phytohormones and explants on callus induction and regeneration of sainfoin (Pnobrychis sativa). Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 49(3):289-292
  • Harlan JR, (1951). Anatomy of gene centers. The American Naturalist. 85(821):97-103
  • Hatipoğlu R, (2012). Bitki biyoteknolojisi. Ders Kitabı, Çukurova Üviversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü. No:176, Adana. (in Turkish)
  • Honarmand L, Zare N, Asghari R and Sheikhzade P, (2016). In vitro regeneration of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) via shoot apex explant. Iranian Journal of Filed Crop Science, 47(2): 315-328
  • Ikeuchi M, Sugimoto K and Iwase A, (2013). Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. The plant cell. 25(9):3159-3173
  • Kagami H, Taguchi K, Arakawa T, Kuroda Y, Tamagake H and Kubo T, (2016). Efficient callus formation and plant regeneration are heritable characters in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Hereditas, 53(1):1-6
  • Kamalvand A and Karamian R, (2013). Somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis studies in tissue culture of Onobrychis altissima Gross. Asian Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, 3(4):115-119
  • Kishii M, (2019). An update of recent use of Aegilops species in wheat breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 10: 585. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00585
  • Mohnen D, (1994). Novel experimental systems for determining cellular competence and determination, in Biology of adventitious root formation. Springer 62(1):87-98
  • Murashige T and Skoog F, (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3):473-497
  • Oğuz MÇ, Dilek Karataş M, Oğuz E, Mujtaba M, Altintaş S and Ergül A. (2021). The comparison of regeneration from root node explants in Solanaceae. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 30(5):4153-4162. doi:10.15244/ pjoes/130456
  • Özcan S, Sevimay CS, Yıldız M, Sancak C and Özgen M, (1996). Prolific shoot regeneration from immature embryo explants of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). Plant Cell Report, 16:200-203
  • Sancak C, (1999). In vitro micropropagation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), Turkish Journal of Botany, 23:133-136
  • Turesson G, (1922), The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas, 3:211-350. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1922.tb02734.x
  • Uysal H and Topbaş T, (2021). Korunga (Onobrychis viciifolia) hipokotil eksplantlarının in vitro rejenerasyon yeteneğinin belirlenmesi. Ziraat Mühendisliği (in Turkish), 372:75-82. doi:10.33724/zm.888511
  • Uzun S and Yükselgüngör D, (2020). Micropropagation of some Onobrychis species through in vitro shoot regeneration. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum - Hortorum Cultus. 19(5):45-52. doi:10.24326/asphc.2020.5.5
  • Yıldız M and Ekiz H, (2014). The effect of sodium hypochlorite solutions on in vitro seedling growth and regeneration capacity of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) hypocotyl explants. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 94:1161-1164. doi:10.4141/cjps2013-250

In vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis sativa)

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 101 - 107, 31.07.2022

Abstract

Local populations and ecotypes are important genetic resources with genetic diversity. It is possible to protect threatened
genotypes and increase biodiversity with in vitro tissue culture techniques. Explant type is of great importance among the
factors affecting the success of in vitro regeneration and callus induction. In this study, Sainfoin seeds belonging to the Gözlü
ecotype were used as experiment material. MS media were prepared with TDZ and combinations of IBA-NAA. Callus
induction and shoot regeneration rates of hypocotyl, leaf and cotyledon explants were determined in the sainfoin ecotype.
According to the results of the study, the best callus formation and shoot regeneration were obtained from the hypocotyl
explant in an MS medium containing 2 mg/L TDZ. In the present study, important results were obtained that will contribute
to the regeneration studies of local ecotypes and wild species, genetic transformation and increasing genetic diversity.

References

  • Akman H and Karaduman Y, (2021). Evaluating technological quality of cultivated Triticum species, interspecific, and intergeneric hybrids for wheat-based products and breeding programs. Journal of Cereal Science. 99,103188. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103188
  • Avcı S, (2010). Collection of wild sainfoin (Onobrychis sp.) species of Turkey and determination of their morphological characteristics, Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University
  • Avcı S, Ilhan E, Erayman M and Sancak C, (2014). Analysis of onobrychis genetic diversity using SSR markers from related legume species. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24(2):556-566
  • Beyaz R, (2014). Determination of salt tolerance of different sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) ecotypes and improvement of new sainfoin lines via in vitro mutagenesis technique. Ankara University, Institute of Biotechnology, Master Thesis, 382402
  • Beyaz R, (2019). Biochemical responses of shoot and root tissues of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) to NaCl-salt stress under in vitro conditions. Turkish Journal of AgricultureFood Science and Technology, 7(1):110-114. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v7i1.110-114.2177
  • Deb G, Sultana S, Bhuiyan MSU, Sarker KK and Papry AS, (2019). In vitro plant regeneration of wild eggplant (Solanum sisymbriifolium) to produce large number of rootstocks for tomato grafting. Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics. pp 65. doi:10.5455/ jabet.2019.d27
  • Ergül A, Khabbazi SD, Oğuz MÇ, Özmen CY, Gürel S and Gürel E, (2018). In vitro multiplication of wild relatives in genus Beta conserves the invaluable threatened germplasms. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 134(1):169- 175. doi:10.1007/s11240-018-1410-0
  • Erişen S, (2005). Yonca Medicago sativa L.’da somatik embriyogenesis aracılığıyla bitki rejenerasyonu. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 11(3):311-315. (in Turkish)
  • Garshasbi H, Omidi M, Torabi S and Davodi D, (2012). The study of phytohormones and explants on callus induction and regeneration of sainfoin (Pnobrychis sativa). Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 49(3):289-292
  • Harlan JR, (1951). Anatomy of gene centers. The American Naturalist. 85(821):97-103
  • Hatipoğlu R, (2012). Bitki biyoteknolojisi. Ders Kitabı, Çukurova Üviversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü. No:176, Adana. (in Turkish)
  • Honarmand L, Zare N, Asghari R and Sheikhzade P, (2016). In vitro regeneration of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) via shoot apex explant. Iranian Journal of Filed Crop Science, 47(2): 315-328
  • Ikeuchi M, Sugimoto K and Iwase A, (2013). Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. The plant cell. 25(9):3159-3173
  • Kagami H, Taguchi K, Arakawa T, Kuroda Y, Tamagake H and Kubo T, (2016). Efficient callus formation and plant regeneration are heritable characters in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Hereditas, 53(1):1-6
  • Kamalvand A and Karamian R, (2013). Somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis studies in tissue culture of Onobrychis altissima Gross. Asian Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, 3(4):115-119
  • Kishii M, (2019). An update of recent use of Aegilops species in wheat breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 10: 585. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00585
  • Mohnen D, (1994). Novel experimental systems for determining cellular competence and determination, in Biology of adventitious root formation. Springer 62(1):87-98
  • Murashige T and Skoog F, (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3):473-497
  • Oğuz MÇ, Dilek Karataş M, Oğuz E, Mujtaba M, Altintaş S and Ergül A. (2021). The comparison of regeneration from root node explants in Solanaceae. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 30(5):4153-4162. doi:10.15244/ pjoes/130456
  • Özcan S, Sevimay CS, Yıldız M, Sancak C and Özgen M, (1996). Prolific shoot regeneration from immature embryo explants of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). Plant Cell Report, 16:200-203
  • Sancak C, (1999). In vitro micropropagation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), Turkish Journal of Botany, 23:133-136
  • Turesson G, (1922), The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas, 3:211-350. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1922.tb02734.x
  • Uysal H and Topbaş T, (2021). Korunga (Onobrychis viciifolia) hipokotil eksplantlarının in vitro rejenerasyon yeteneğinin belirlenmesi. Ziraat Mühendisliği (in Turkish), 372:75-82. doi:10.33724/zm.888511
  • Uzun S and Yükselgüngör D, (2020). Micropropagation of some Onobrychis species through in vitro shoot regeneration. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum - Hortorum Cultus. 19(5):45-52. doi:10.24326/asphc.2020.5.5
  • Yıldız M and Ekiz H, (2014). The effect of sodium hypochlorite solutions on in vitro seedling growth and regeneration capacity of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) hypocotyl explants. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 94:1161-1164. doi:10.4141/cjps2013-250
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Burak Turgut

Muhammet Çağrı Oğuz

Burak Önol This is me

Cengiz Sancak This is me

Publication Date July 31, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Turgut, M. B., Oğuz, M. Ç., Önol, B., Sancak, C. (2022). In vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis sativa). Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, 8(2), 101-107.
AMA Turgut MB, Oğuz MÇ, Önol B, Sancak C. In vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis sativa). Ekin Journal. July 2022;8(2):101-107.
Chicago Turgut, Mehmet Burak, Muhammet Çağrı Oğuz, Burak Önol, and Cengiz Sancak. “In Vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis Sativa)”. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics 8, no. 2 (July 2022): 101-7.
EndNote Turgut MB, Oğuz MÇ, Önol B, Sancak C (July 1, 2022) In vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis sativa). Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics 8 2 101–107.
IEEE M. B. Turgut, M. Ç. Oğuz, B. Önol, and C. Sancak, “In vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis sativa)”, Ekin Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 101–107, 2022.
ISNAD Turgut, Mehmet Burak et al. “In Vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis Sativa)”. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics 8/2 (July 2022), 101-107.
JAMA Turgut MB, Oğuz MÇ, Önol B, Sancak C. In vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis sativa). Ekin Journal. 2022;8:101–107.
MLA Turgut, Mehmet Burak et al. “In Vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis Sativa)”. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, vol. 8, no. 2, 2022, pp. 101-7.
Vancouver Turgut MB, Oğuz MÇ, Önol B, Sancak C. In vitro Plant Regeneration Efficiency from Different Explants of Local Sainfoin Ecotype (Onobrychis sativa). Ekin Journal. 2022;8(2):101-7.