Understanding employee wellness in industry 5.0: A systematic review

Abstract

The 21st century has brought about significant technological advancements, leading to Industry 5.0—marked by cutting-edge technologies such as AI, robotics, and the Internet of Things. While these advancements have brought numerous benefits to organizations, including heightened productivity and efficiency, they have posed new challenges in employee wellness. This systematic review investigated the impact of emotional intelligence and new technologies on employee wellness in Industry 5.0. The review yielded seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Findings showed that emotional intelligence positively influences work performance and job satisfaction. On the other hand, factors such as organizational justice and job dropout harm employees’ wellness. The study also found that physical workplace conditions and employee autonomy play a significant role in employee wellness and job satisfaction. Using new technologies, such as robotization, can potentially dehumanize employees, but it can be prevented by exploring sustainable solutions and addressing ergonomic adverse effects. The study concludes with the importance of considering employees’ subjective wellness and promoting a human-centric approach in Industry 5.0. The results of this study have important implications for organizations and provide a foundation for future research in human resource management.

References

1. Chin, S. T. S. (2021). Influence of emotional intelligence on the workforce for industry 5.0. Journal of Human Resources Management Research,, 882278.
2. Esthela, G.-V., Rafael, R.-R., & Bayardo, T.-P. L. (2021). A structural equations model of job disengagement from the constructs of organizational justice, job satisfaction, innovation, and trust in the era of industry 5.0. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24, 1–12.
3. Firescu, V., Gaşpar, M.-L., Crucianu, I., & Rotariu, E. (2022). Collaboration Between Humans and Robots in Organizations: A Macroergonomic, Emotional, and Spiritual Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
4. Kalateh, S., Estrada-Jimenez, L. A., Pulikottil, T., Hojjati, S. N., & Barata, J. (2022). The human role in Human-centric Industry. 1–6.
5. Østergaard, E. H. (2018). Welcome to industry 5.0. Retrieved Febr, 5, 2020.
6. Pouyakian, M. (2022). Cybergonomics: Proposing and justification of a new name for the ergonomics of Industry 4.0 technologies. Frontiers in Public Health, 4227.
7. Qaisar, M. N., Mariam, S., & Ahmad, F. (2018). Employee wellness as predictor of productivity from public sector management perspectives: Conditional process analysis. NUML International Journal of Business & Management, 13 (2), 104–116.
8. Roslender, R., Stevenson, J., & Kahn, H. (2006). Employee wellness as intellectual capital: An accounting perspective. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10 (1), 48–64.

9. Sen, W., Hong, Z., & Xiaomei, Z. (2022). Effects of human–machine interaction on employee’s learning: A contingent perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
10. Søvold, L. E., Naslund, J. A., Kousoulis, A. A., Saxena, S., Qoronfleh, M. W., Grobler, C., & Münter, L. (2021). Prioritizing the mental health and well-being of healthcare workers: An urgent global public health priority. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 679397.
11. Turja, T., Särkikoski, T., Koistinen, P., & Melin, H. (2022). Basic human needs and robotization: How to make deployment of robots worthwhile for everyone? Technology in Society, 68, 101917.