Social Networks as Practical Classrooms: A Study of Language Change and its Impact on ELT
Yıl 2014,
Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 37 - 47, 12.07.2014
Rajyashree Khushu Lahiri
Urjani Chakravarty
Öz
Social Networks and Language Change are an important area of study in today’s world. The present study discusses the user friendly nature of Social Networks and how it is of interest to teachers and researchers as it exemplifies the Communicative Approach to the teaching of a language. This study posits that social networks have not only changed the individuals’ linguistic behaviour but also made it easy for him/her to acquire facility in a language in a relatively short span of time. The easy accessibility of these networks and their flexible language norms in diverse situations has initiated people into a language. In the context of India it has been seen that the fewer the language norms a person is asked to follow the better s/he conforms to the interaction norm in the virtual community at first and in the society subsequently. Ben Zimmer (2009.Web)) in his Virtual Thesaurus writes that language in the forums like Twitter and Facebook changed the word “friend into a transitive verb to describe the act of adding someone to an online list of acquaintances.” and that there are a list of un-verbs which are redefining the English word formation rules such as ‘unfollow a post’ or ‘unlike an update’.Further the study explicates this phenomenon within a pragmatic framework which provides a set of rules governing conversation and the social use of language enabling a communicative approach to the teaching of language.
Kaynakça
- Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1987).Collaborating on contributions to conversations.Language and cognitive processes, 2, 19-41.
- Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989).Contributing to discourse.Cognitive science, 13, 259- 294.
- Dixon, R.M.W. (1991). A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gorney, Elizabeth. (2012).The Language of Texting: Altering English or a Language of its Own?.Undergraduate review: a journal of undergraduate student research, 13, 39- 42.Web.Retrieved from<http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/ur/vol13/iss1/9>.
- Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation.In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds).Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
- Grice, H. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax And semantics:Vol. 9. (pp. 113-127). New York: Academic Press.
- Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz& D. Hymes (Eds.). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication.New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
- Hanić, J. (2009). Prefixes and prototypes: Contrasting the English verbal prefix un-and Bosnian raz. Jezikoslovlje, (10.2), 153-181.
- Lehrer, A. (1995). Prefixes in English word formation. Folia linguistica, 29(1-2), 133-148
- OoiV .(2002). Aspects of computer-mediated communication for research in corpus linguistics. In Peters P, Collins P, Smith A (Ed), New frontiers of corpus research, (pp.91- 104) Amsterdam:Rodopi.
- Richards, J. C. and T. S. Rodgers.(2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.Web.Retrieved from <books.google.co.in/books?isbn=0521008433>.
- Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds).Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 59-82). New York: Academic Press.
- Shortis, T. (2001).The language of ICT: information and communication technology. London: Routledge.
- Thurlow, C. (2001a). Language and the Internet.In R. Mesthrie& R. Asher (Eds).The concise encyclopaedia of sociolinguistics (pp. 287–289). London: Pergamon.
- Thurlow, C. (2003). Generation Txt?The Sociolinguistics of Young People‘s Textmessaging.Discourse analysis online.Web.Retrieved from <http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/>.
- Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. &Tomic, A. (2004).Computer mediated communication: social interaction and the internet. London: Sage.
- Wilson A. (1992). A pragmatic device in electronic communication.California linguistic notes23Vol .2 (pp. 42-43). Reprinted in Journal of pragmatics 19 (pp. 389-392) [1993].
- Zimmer, B. (2009). On Language: Age of Undoing. Web.Accessed 20 September 2012 Available online at: <www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/.../20FOB-onlanguage-t.htm.>
Yıl 2014,
Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 37 - 47, 12.07.2014
Rajyashree Khushu Lahiri
Urjani Chakravarty
Kaynakça
- Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1987).Collaborating on contributions to conversations.Language and cognitive processes, 2, 19-41.
- Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989).Contributing to discourse.Cognitive science, 13, 259- 294.
- Dixon, R.M.W. (1991). A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gorney, Elizabeth. (2012).The Language of Texting: Altering English or a Language of its Own?.Undergraduate review: a journal of undergraduate student research, 13, 39- 42.Web.Retrieved from<http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/ur/vol13/iss1/9>.
- Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation.In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds).Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
- Grice, H. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax And semantics:Vol. 9. (pp. 113-127). New York: Academic Press.
- Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz& D. Hymes (Eds.). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication.New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
- Hanić, J. (2009). Prefixes and prototypes: Contrasting the English verbal prefix un-and Bosnian raz. Jezikoslovlje, (10.2), 153-181.
- Lehrer, A. (1995). Prefixes in English word formation. Folia linguistica, 29(1-2), 133-148
- OoiV .(2002). Aspects of computer-mediated communication for research in corpus linguistics. In Peters P, Collins P, Smith A (Ed), New frontiers of corpus research, (pp.91- 104) Amsterdam:Rodopi.
- Richards, J. C. and T. S. Rodgers.(2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.Web.Retrieved from <books.google.co.in/books?isbn=0521008433>.
- Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds).Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 59-82). New York: Academic Press.
- Shortis, T. (2001).The language of ICT: information and communication technology. London: Routledge.
- Thurlow, C. (2001a). Language and the Internet.In R. Mesthrie& R. Asher (Eds).The concise encyclopaedia of sociolinguistics (pp. 287–289). London: Pergamon.
- Thurlow, C. (2003). Generation Txt?The Sociolinguistics of Young People‘s Textmessaging.Discourse analysis online.Web.Retrieved from <http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/>.
- Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. &Tomic, A. (2004).Computer mediated communication: social interaction and the internet. London: Sage.
- Wilson A. (1992). A pragmatic device in electronic communication.California linguistic notes23Vol .2 (pp. 42-43). Reprinted in Journal of pragmatics 19 (pp. 389-392) [1993].
- Zimmer, B. (2009). On Language: Age of Undoing. Web.Accessed 20 September 2012 Available online at: <www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/.../20FOB-onlanguage-t.htm.>