Response of PLA material to 3D printing speeds: A comprehensive examination on mechanical properties and production quality

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of printing speed on the mechanical properties of parts produced through the fused deposition modeling (FDM) method using a three-dimensional (3D) printer. Tensile test specimens, fabricated with Polylactic Acid (PLA) material on an Ender 3 S1 3D printer, were subjected to varying printing speeds from 15 mm/s to 105 mm/s in 15 mm/s increments, maintaining a 100% infill rate. Detailed measurements of sample masses, hardness values, and surface roughness were conducted to assess the potential effects of printing speed on PLA’s mechanical properties. Porosity values were also calculated to evaluate internal structure homogeneity and void ratios. The results indicate that an increase in printing speed leads to a substantial reduction in production time. For instance, at a speed of 15 mm/s, the printing time was 119 minutes, decreasing to 15 minutes at 105 mm/s. As speed increased, there was a tendency for a decrease in sample masses, with a notable 12% reduction from 8.21 grams at 15 mm/s to 7.21 grams at 105 mm/s. While lower speeds (15 and 30 mm/s) exhibited higher Shore D hardness values, an overall decrease in hardness was observed with increasing speed. Surface roughness showed a proportional increase with printing speed; for example, at 0° angle, the roughness value increased from 0.8 at 15 mm/s to 1.9 at 105 mm/s. Moreover, tensile strength values decreased with higher printing speeds. For samples printed at 15 mm/s, the tensile strength was 60 MPa, decreasing to 44 MPa at 105 mm/s, representing a 27% reduction. These numerical findings underscore the significant influence of 3D printing speed on both production efficiency and the mechanical properties of the printed material.

Keywords

• Additive manufacturing
• three dimensional printing
• polylactic acid
• printing speed
• mechanical properties
• surface roughness.

References

1. Zhu, Y., Gao, Y., Jiang, J., Gu, H., Lv, S., Ni, H., Wang, X., & Jia, C. (2019, November 1). Study on effects of FDM 3D printing parameters on mechanical properties of polylactic acid. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 688(3), 033026-033026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/688/3/033026
2. Wang, X. C., Wei, J., Yi, X. B., Zhang, J., Shang, K., & Wang, Q. (2014, September 1). 3D printing technology and the adaptability of printing material. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 633-634, 569-573. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.633-634.569
3. Afonso, J. A., Alves, J. L., Caldas, G., Gouveia, B. P., Santana, L., & Belinha, J. (2021). Influence of 3D printing process parameters on the mechanical properties and mass of PLA parts and predictive models. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 27(3), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2020-0043
4. Lanzotti, A., Grasso, M., Staiano, G., & Martorelli, M. (2015). The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(5), 604-617. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135
5. Khosravani, M. R., Berto, F., Ayatollahi, M. R., & Reinicke, T. (2022). Characterization of 3D-printed PLA parts with different raster orientations and printing speeds. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1016. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05005-4
6. Tang, C., Liu, J., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Jiang, S., & Hao, W. (2020). Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA lattice structures. Composites Part C: Open Access, 3, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100076
7. Ansari, A. A., & Kamil, M. (2021). Effect of print speed and extrusion temperature on properties of 3D printed PLA using fused deposition modeling process. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 5462-5468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.137
8. El Magri, A., Vanaei, S., Shirinbayan, M., Vaudreuil, S., & Tcharkhtchi, A. (2021). An investigation to study the effect of process parameters on the strength and fatigue behavior of 3D-printed PLA-graphene. Polymers, 13(19), 3218. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193218

9. Kamer, M. S., Temiz, Ş., Yaykaşlı, H., Kaya, A., & Akay, O. (2022). Comparison of mechanical properties of tensile test specimens produced with ABS and PLA material at different printing speeds in 3D printer. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 37(3), 1197-1211.
10. Maguluri, N., Suresh, G., & Guntur, S. R. (2022, July). Effect of printing parameters on the hardness of 3D printed poly-lactic acid parts using DOE approach. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1248, No. 1, p. 012004). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1248/1/012004
11. Vidakis, N., Petousis, M., Karapidakis, E., Mountakis, N., David, C., & Sagris, D. (2023). Energy consumption versus strength in MEΧ 3D printing of polylactic acid. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 6, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2023.100119
12. Portoacă, A. I., Ripeanu, R. G., Diniță, A., & Tănase, M. (2023). Optimization of 3D printing parameters for enhanced surface quality and wear resistance. Polymers, 15(16), 3419. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163419
13. Abeykoon, C., Abeykoon, C., & Fernando, A. (2020, September 1). Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, 3(3), 284-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003
14. Dudek, P. (2013, December 1). FDM 3D printing technology in manufacturing composite elements. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 58(4), 1415-1418. https://doi.org/10.2478/amm-2013-0186
15. Gordeev, E. G., Galushko, A. S., & Ananikov, V. P. (2018, June 7). Improvement of quality of 3D printed objects by elimination of microscopic structural defects in fused deposition modeling. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0198370-e0198370. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198370
16. Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C. G., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R. (2018, August 1). FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review. Polymer Testing, 69, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020
17. Sandhu, K., Singh, S., & Prakash, C. (2019, October 1). Analysis of angular shrinkage of fused filament fabricated poly-lactic-acid prints and its relationship with other process parameters. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 561(1), 012058-012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/561/1/012058
18. Shen, Z., Hua, H., Yang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2018, November 6). Effect of fabrication parameters and material features on tensile strength of FDM built parts. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 423, 012050-012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/423/1/012050
19. Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2012, January 1). Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. Journal of Advanced Research, 3(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001
20. Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020, July 10). FDM-based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: A review on mechanical properties, defects and treatments. Polymers, 12(7), 1529-1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071529
21. Pan, A. Q., Huang, Z. F., Guo, R., & Li, J. (2015, October 1). Effect of FDM process on adhesive strength of polylactic acid (PLA) filament. Key Engineering Materials, 667, 181-186. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.667.181
22. Liu, W., Zhou, J., Ma, Y., Wang, J., & Xu, J. (2017, December 1). Fabrication of PLA filaments and its printable performance. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 275, 012033-012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/275/1/012033
23. Li, J., Li, H. B., Dong, J., Wang, T. Y., & Zhang, H. T. (2018, February 1). The investigation of the effect caused by deposition velocity on bonding degree within the structure of FDM. Key Engineering Materials, 764, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.764.142
24. Wu, J. (2018, August 3). Study on optimization of 3D printing parameters. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 392, 062050-062050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/062050
25. Santana, L., Ahrens, C. H., Netto, A. D. C. S., & Bonin, C. (2017, June 20). Evaluating the deposition quality of parts produced by an open-source 3D printer. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23(4), 796-803. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2016-0078
26. Giri, J., Patil, A., & Prabhu, H. (2018, September 8). The effect of various parameters on the nozzle diameter and 3D printed product in fused deposition modelling: An approach. In S. K. S. Yadav & A. K. Yadav (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 839-847). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1217-5_83