Impact of structural and CFD analysis on the cost of biogas-fueled gas engine exhaust pipes

Abstract

In this study, the effects of exhaust pipe design used in biogas-fueled cogeneration systems on engineering performance and cost were investigated. First, the existing system was analyzed by field work, and then structural analysis was applied with CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics). The exhaust pipe route, pipe diameter, and material thickness of the existing system were evaluated, and design improvements were suggested. It was determined that the shorter pipeline application with the changes made in the pipe route and layout reduced pressure losses. Despite the use of an exhaust pipe with a smaller diameter and made of thinner material in the proposed new design, compliance with the standards was ensured, and it was shown to be safe against wind loads with finite element analysis. Considering the calculated maximum wind load of 5.52 kN and the weight of the system, the maximum stress value was calculated as 108.691 MPa as a result of the Von Mises stress analysis applied to the exhaust pipe system in the finite element analysis. This value showed that the system was 1.56 times safer. In the deformation analysis, the maximum displacement value was measured as 0.13 mm, and this value is ideal. In the cost analysis, it was determined that the proposed new system provides a cost reduction of approximately 53% compared to the existing system. The results obtained emphasize the importance of engineering analysis in exhaust pipe design, and show the applicability of the approach to increase economic and environmental sustainability in industrial facilities.

Keywords

• Biogas Installation
• CFD analysis
• Exhaust pipe design
• Energy Efficiency
• Cogeneration
• Structural Analysis

References

1. 1. Man, S. S., Lee, W. K. H., Chan, A. H. S., & Tsang, S. N. H. (2023). The economic and environmental evaluations of combined heat and power systems in buildings with different contexts: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 13(6), 3855. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063855
2. 2. Tanrıver, K., & Ay, M. (2024). Modifying the refuse chute design to prevent infection spread: Engineering analysis and optimization. Applied Sciences, 14(21), 9638. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219638
3. 3. Siripaiboon, C., Sitthichirachat, P., Sarabhorn, P., Somkeattikul, K., Areeprasert, C., & Scala, F. (2025). Design, CFD simulation, and experimental verification of a novel fixed-bed decoupling gasifier with an integrated syngas burner using high-temperature flue gas. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 196, 106883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.106883
4. 4. Huang, Z., Liu, L., Wang, Z., Wang, C., Liu, Y., Liu, B., Zheng, G., & Yan, H. (2025). CFD analysis of flow and heat transfer enhancement in a tower-type zinc refining furnace with novel structural designs. Applied Thermal Engineering, 263, 125327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.125327
5. 5. Alhashem, A., Almutairi, A. S., & Almokmesh, S. F. (2025). Flue gas recirculation in steam boilers: A comprehensive assessment strategy for energy optimization and efficiency enhancement. Processes, 13(2), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020395
6. 6. An, R., & Zhang, X. (2025). Evaluation of weighted-sum-of-gray-gases models and radiation characteristics analysis for gas-ash particle mixture in ash deposition. Applied Thermal Engineering, 267, 125820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.125820
7. 7. Yolus, A., Kayan, G., Yılmaz, Ş., & Tıkız, I. (2022). Recovery waste heat on exhaust of ship with thermoelectric generators. Journal of Maritime Research: Amphora, 1(1), 43–59.
8. 8. Sharma, G., Kumar, J., Sharma, S., Singh, G., Singh, J., Sharma, A., Chohan, J. S., Kumar, R., & Obaid, A. J. (2022). Performance of diesel engine having waste heat recovery system fixed on stainless steel made exhaust gas pipe. Materials Today: Proceedings, 48(5), 1141–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.511

9. 9. Li, Z., Zhang, X., & Dong, Z. (2023). TSF-transformer: A time series forecasting model for exhaust gas emission using transformer. Applied Intelligence, 53, 17211–17225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04326-1
10. 10. Kumar, A., Chaudhary, S. K., & Kumar, R. (2024). Vibrational analysis of an exhaust pipe flange with rib using ANSYS software. In A. De, P. P. Mukherjee, S. Pati, & A. Biswas (Eds.), Recent Trends in Mechanical Engineering. ICRAME 2024. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 67–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7535-4_7
11. 11. Nejatzadegan, F., Sobhani, V., Pahlavan, M., & Dehghan, A. (2025). Effect of exhaust manifold geometry design on the performance of an internal combustion engine. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 162, 108593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.108593
12. 12. Başaran, H. Ü. (2024). Enhanced after-treatment warm up in diesel vehicles through modulating fuel injection and exhaust valve closure timing. European Mechanical Science, 8(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.1441861
13. 13. Zhang, S., Shen, M., Kang, Y., & Tang, Z. (2025). The design and experimental study of a deep-condensing waste heat recovery system for boiler flue gas based on Baoneng Heating Plant. Processes, 13(2), 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020306
14. 14. Shi, Z., Wei, H., Li, G., Wang, Y., Li, Q., Zheng, X., Song, K., Chen, C., Ma, C., Mozumder, S. A., & Basher, M. K. (2025). Research and analysis of explosion-proof diesel engine performance based on different exhaust gas cooling systems. Energies, 18(3), 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030610
15. 15. Li, Y., Yu, J., Liu, Y., Huang, R., Wang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2022). A review on removal of mercury from flue gas utilizing existing air pollutant control devices (APCDs). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 427, 128132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128132
16. 16. Kalak, T. (2023). Potential use of industrial biomass waste as a sustainable energy source in the future. Energies, 16(4), 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041783
17. 17. European Committee for Standardization. (2009). EN 1856-1: Chimneys — Requirements for metal chimneys — Part 1: System chimney products. Brussels, Belgium.
18. 18. European Committee for Standardization. (2022). EN 13384-1: Chimneys — Thermal and fluid dynamic calculation methods — Part 1: Chimneys serving one heating appliance. Brussels, Belgium.
19. 19. Jenbacher. (2025). Jenbacher J208 Gas Engine. Retrieved February 23, 2025, from https://www.jenbacher.com/en/gas-engines/type-2/j208
20. 20. European Committee for Standardization. (2009). EN 1859: Chimneys — Metal chimneys — Test methods. Brussels, Belgium.
21. 21. Tanrıver, K., & Ay, M. (2024). Investigation of flue gas temperature effects in natural gas fueled systems: Experimental thermal performance and structural optimization. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 107, 109428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2024.109428
22. 22. Reza Kashyzadeh, K., Ridha, W. K. M., & Ghorbani, S. (2025). The influence of nanocoatings on the wear, corrosion, and erosion properties of AISI 304 and AISI 316L stainless steels: A critical review regarding hydro turbines. Corrosion and Materials Degradation, 6(6), 10006. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd6010006
23. 23. Kaymaz, R., Tanrıver, K., & Ak, M. (2025). Chimney installation and thermal-flow analysis in cogeneration systems. Paper presented at the 2nd International Texas Congress on Advanced Scientific Research and Innovation, January 27–28, Houston, Texas.
24. 24. Tanrıver, K., & Ay, M. (2020). Comparison of calculation programs in a stainless-steel chimney application. Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural Medical Sciences International Indexed Refereed, 7(10), 97–111.
25. 25. Ali, F. A., Hamandi, S. J., & Mohammed-Salih, H. S. (2025). Introducing a novel orthodontic bracket holder with a SolidWorks-based semiautomatic positioner tested via finite element analysis. Discover Applied Sciences, 7, 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06368-1
26. 26. Uličný, M. M., Cigánek, J., Kutiš, V., Kučera, E., & Šedivý, J. (2025). Modeling and co-simulation of fuzzy logic controller for artificial cybernetic hand. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9020012
27. 27. Turkish Standards Institute. (2021). TS 498: Calculation values of loads to be taken into account in the sizing of buildings. Ankara, Turkey.
28. 28. Yüksel, S., Şirin, T. B., Ay, M., Uçar, M., & Kurt, M. (2024). A study on end mill tool geometry parameters for end milling of 316 L: Finite element analysis and response surface methodology optimization based on resultant cutting force. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 46(8).
29. 29. Tanrıver, K., & Ay, M. (2023). Experimental, software and topological optimization study of unpredictable forces in bolted connections. Tehnički Vjesnik, 30(4), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20221113121639
30. 30. Tanrıver, K., Dilibal, S., Şahin, H., & Kentli, A. (2021). A novel design on polymeric material recycling technology. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 43