Fatigue and Dynamic Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Sleepers

Abstract

In ballasted railway tracks, one of the important components that supports the rails and distributes wheel/rail loading onto the ballast supporting formation is a railway sleeper. In this paper, the dynamic and fatigue response of prestressed concrete sleepers used along the Ethiopian National Railway lines (Chinese Type II sleeper) is presented. For simulation, a finite element modelling package, ANSYS was employed. Concrete was modelled using a three-dimensional solid element (SOLID 65) and the behavior of prestressing wires was simulated using truss elements (LINK 180). Validation of simulation results was done using existing experimental data of Rikard’s model. To obtain resonance conditions; the harmonic response of the sleeper for the excitation in the range of 0-2000Hz and variation of stress and displacement amplitudes with respect to frequency were studied. It’s observed that the most resonant frequency corresponds to the third bending mode shape. From fatigue life assessment in this study, it is observed that the sleeper fails before attaining its design life of 40 years (11,300,400 cycles). This is due to the development of cracks which are likely to limit the sleeper’s ability to hold the geometry of the line. As a result, the sleeper cannot attain the main technical standards of speed of 120 km/h and axle load of 25 tons. The minimum life of the sleeper is equivalent to about 31.8% of its design life. Moreover, it was observed that at a speed of 80km/h and an axle load of 25 tons, the life of the sleeper was found to be 85%. Thus, to attain the design life of the sleeper, during operational phase, it is recommended to limit the speed of the train to 80km/h.

Keywords

• ballasted track
• fatigue
• frequency response
• prestressed concrete sleeper
• speed

References

1. 1. Kaewunruen, S., & Remennikov, A. (2007). Experimental and numerical studies of railway prestressed concrete sleepers under static and impact loads. Civil Computing, vol. 3, pp. 25-28.
2. 2. Selig, E. T., & Waters, J. M. (1994). Track geotechnology and substructure management. Thomas Telford.
3. 3. Esveld, C., & Esveld, C. (2001). Modern railway track (Vol. 385). Zaltbommel: MRT-productions.
4. 4. Taherinezhad, J., Sofi, M., Mendis, P., & Ngo, T. (2013). A review of behaviour of prestressed concrete sleepers. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 13(1), 1-16.
5. 5. Hwang, C. L., Chen, C. T., Lee, L. S., Bui, L. A. T., Hou, B. S., & Hsieh, H. Y. (2011). The material and mechanical property of heavy-duty prestressed concrete sleeper. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 97, pp. 408-413). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
6. 6. Remennikov, A. M., & Kaewunruen, S. (2008). A review of loading conditions for railway track structures due to train and track vertical interaction. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 15(2), 207-234.
7. 7. Kaewunruen, S., & Remennikov, A. M. (2009). Dynamic flexural influence on a railway concrete sleeper in track system due to a single wheel impact. Engineering Failure Analysis, 16(3), 705-712.
8. 8. H. Thun, Assessment of fatigue resistance and strength in existing concrete structures, Luleå: Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 2006.

9. 9. CEB-FIP, Fatigue of Concrete Structures - State-of-the-Art Report, 1988.
10. 10. You, R., Li, D., Ngamkhanong, C., Janeliukstis, R., & Kaewunruen, S. (2017). Fatigue life assessment method for prestressed concrete sleepers. Frontiers in built environment, 3, 68.
11. 11. Rao, C., & Frantz, G. C. (1996). Fatigue tests of 27-year-old prestressed concrete bridge box beams. PCI journal, 41, 74-83.
12. 12. R. Gustavson, Static and dynamic finite element analyses of concrete sleepers., Göteborg, Sweden: Department of structural engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 2000.
13. 13. S. Li, "Railway Sleeper Modelling with Deterministic and Non-deterministic Support Conditions," Master Degree Project, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2012.
14. 14. National Standard of People’s Republic of China. GB 50010-2002, "Code for design of concrete structures [S]," China Building Industry Press, Beijing, 2002.
15. 15. Grassie, S. L. (1995). Dynamic modelling of concrete railway sleepers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 187(5), 799-813.
16. 16. Barke, D. W., & Chiu, W. K. (2005). A review of the effects of out-of-round wheels on track and vehicle components. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 219(3), 151-175.
17. 17. Knothe, K. L., & Grassie, S. L. (1993). Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies. Vehicle system dynamics, 22(3-4), 209-262.
18. 18. G. P. Mallet, Fatigue of Reinforced Concrete, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO), 1991.
19. 19. Parvez, A., & Foster, S. J. (2017). Fatigue of steel-fibre-reinforced concrete prestressed railway sleepers. Engineering Structures, 141, 241-250.