Abstract
The study examines the observance of safe following distances under real traffic conditions. Maintaining an appropriate following distance plays a key role in accident prevention, as it gives drivers sufficient time to perceive hazards and react appropriately. To record empirical data, a rear radar sensor was installed on the test vehicle, which continuously measured the distance and speed of the vehicle behind. This method allowed for a detailed analysis of how the following distance changes as a function of speed.
The collected data was compared with the minimum safety requirements based on reaction time and braking performance described in the literature. The comparison shows the extent to which actual driver behavior deviates from the recommended safety standards. Although modern vehicles are increasingly equipped with driver assistance systems, such as automatic emergency braking, the vast majority of vehicles in Hungary are not yet equipped with such systems. As a result, road safety depends largely on individual driver decisions and compliance with the rules.
The results highlight the potential accident risks arising from inadequate following distances, especially in everyday traffic situations where drivers often underestimate the distance required for a safe stop. The measurement result show that most drivers following distance is shorter than the average stopping distance. The research contributes to a deeper understanding of domestic driving habits and provides a basis for the development of road safety campaigns, driver training programs, and possible regulatory measures. Overall, the results emphasize the importance of maintaining a safe following distance as a simple, cost-effective, and efficient means of improving road safety.
References
- 1. Makridis, M., Mattas, K., & Ciuffo, B. (2020). Response time and time headway of an adaptive cruise control: An empirical characteri-zation and potential impacts on road capacity. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(4), 1677–1686. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2948646
- 2. Luu, L., Phan, T. L., Pham, H. T., Hoang, T., & Le, M. T. (2024). Stability of adaptive cruise control of automated vehicle platoon un-der constant time headway policy. International Journal of Automo-tive Science And Technology, 8(3), 397-403. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1469674
- 3. Rózsás, Z., Lakatos, I., & Péter, T. Building a Training Dataset for Machine Learning, Radar-Based Pedestrian Detection. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, 9(Special Issue 1st Future of Vehicles: Innovation, Engineering and Economic Conference), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1756258
- 4. Aloui, K. et al. AI-Driven Unified SysML-RoadRunner Integration Approach: An Intelligent Bridge Between MBSE and 3D Simula-tion for Autonomous Vehicle. Engineering Perspective, 5(4), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.64808/engineeringperspective.1760896
- 5. Sugira, J. C., Ninteretse, J. D. D., Nshimiyimana, M., Niyogakiza, P. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Road Safety Performance in Sub-Saharan African Countries Using Road Safety Performance Index. Engineering Perspective, 5(2), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.77134
- 6. Gless, S. (2024). Regulating driving automation in the European Union. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231213336
- 7. Duffney, R., Borowsky, A., & Bar-Gera, H. (2022). The effects of adaptive cruise control (ACC) headway time on young-experienced drivers’ overtaking tendency in a driving simulator. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 86, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.02.008
- 8. Fildes, B., Keall, M., Bos, N., Lie, A., Page, Y., Pastor, C., Pennisi, L., Rizzi, M., Thomas, P., & Tingvall, C. (2015). Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 81, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.029
- 9. Mohammed, D., & Horváth, B. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Following Distances in Different Adaptive Cruise Control Systems at Steady Speeds. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15030116
- 10. Mohammed, D., Nagy, V., Jagicza, M., Józsa, D., & Horváth, B. (2024). Efficiency of adaptive cruise control in commercial vehicles. Pollack Periodica, 19(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2024.00970
- 11. Schakel, W. J., Van Arem, B., & Netten, B. D. (2010). Effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic flow stability. IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC, 759–764. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625133
- 12. Tan, H., Zhao, F., Hao, H., Liu, Z., Amer, A. A., & Babiker, H. (2020). Automatic emergency braking (AEB) system impact on fa-tality and injury reduction in China. International Journal of Envi-ronmental Research and Public Health, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030917
- 13. Woo, H., Madokoro, H., Sato, K., Tamura, Y., Yamashita, A., & Asama, H. (2019). Advanced adaptive cruise control based on op-eration characteristic estimation and trajectory prediction. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224875
- 14. Yue, L., Abdel-Aty, M., Wu, Y., & Wang, L. (2018). Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles’ advanced driver assistance, con-nectivity and low level automation systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 117, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.002
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Automotive Safety Engineering |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | September 26, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | December 11, 2025 |
| Early Pub Date | December 16, 2025 |
| Publication Date | December 28, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 5 Issue: 1st Future of Vehicles Conf. |