Research Article

Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern

Volume: 56 Number: 3 September 30, 2022
EN

Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore sphenoid sinus variations in individuals with various sagittal skeletal anomalies using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed sphenoid sinus pneumatization on CBCT images of 126 patients aged 18–86 years. The anteroposterior skeletal relationships of the maxilla and mandible were classified as skeletal class I, II or III using the A point–nasion–B point (ANB) angle measured in the sagittal plane. The extensions of the sphenoid sinus were evaluated on three planes including axial, sagittal and coronal sections. Results The study population consisted of 84 females (66.7%) and 42 males (33.3%), including 52 (41.3%) class I, 38 (30.1%) class II, and 36 (28.6%) class III cases. The conchal type of sphenoid sinus was not encountered. Presellar sinuses were detected in only 3 (5.8%) class I cases. Incomplete sinuses were detected in 16 (30.8%) class I, 7 (18.4%) class II, and 15 (41.7%) class III cases. Complete sinuses were detected in 33 (63.4%) class I, 31 (81.6%) class II, and 21 (58.3%) class III cases. Lateral extensions were found in 103 (40.9%) of the 252 sinus walls: 33 (31.7%) in class I, 45 (59.2%) in class II, and 25 (34.7%) in class III sinuses. Conclusion Regional sphenoid sinus anatomy can be carefully examined via CBCT. The sphenoid sinus pneumatization did not differ significantly in patients exhibiting different types of sagittal skeletal closure, with the exception of the lesser wing type.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Štoković N, Trkulja V, Dumić-Čule I et al. Sphenoid sinus types, dimensions and relationship with surrounding structures. Ann Anat-Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2016;203:69-76.
  2. 2. Fujioka M, Young LW. The sphenoidal sinuses: radiographic patterns of normal development and abnormal findings in infants and children. Radiology 1978;129(1):133-6.
  3. 3. Tan HK, Ong Y, Teo MS, Fook-Chong S. The development of sphenoid sinus in Asian children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67(12):1295-302.
  4. 4. Wang J, Bidari S, Inoue K, Yang H, Rhoton Jr A. Extensions of the sphenoid sinus: a new classification. Neurosurgery 2010;66(4):797-816.
  5. 5. Cheung D, Attia E, Kirkpatrick D, Marcarian B, Wright B. An anatomic and CT scan study of the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus as related to the transnasal transethmoid endoscopic approach. J Otolaryngol 1993;22(2):63-8.
  6. 6. Mafee MF, Chow JM, Meyers R. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: anatomy, CT screening, indications, and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160(4):735-44.
  7. 7. DeLano MC, Fun F, Zinreich SJ. Relationship of the optic nerve to the posterior paranasal sinuses: a CT anatomic study. Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:669-75.
  8. 8. Yune HY, Holden RW, Smith JA. Normal variations and lesions of the sphenoid sinus. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975;124(1):129-38.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Dentistry

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2022

Submission Date

September 24, 2021

Acceptance Date

February 20, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 56 Number: 3

APA
Yesiltepe, S., Kurtuldu, E., Bayrakdar, İ. Ş., & Yılmaz, A. B. (2022). Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern. European Oral Research, 56(3), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20221000193
AMA
1.Yesiltepe S, Kurtuldu E, Bayrakdar İŞ, Yılmaz AB. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern. EOR. 2022;56(3):143-148. doi:10.26650/eor.20221000193
Chicago
Yesiltepe, Selin, Elif Kurtuldu, İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar, and Ahmet Berhan Yılmaz. 2022. “Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Sphenoid Sinus in Different Sagittal Skeletal Pattern”. European Oral Research 56 (3): 143-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20221000193.
EndNote
Yesiltepe S, Kurtuldu E, Bayrakdar İŞ, Yılmaz AB (September 1, 2022) Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern. European Oral Research 56 3 143–148.
IEEE
[1]S. Yesiltepe, E. Kurtuldu, İ. Ş. Bayrakdar, and A. B. Yılmaz, “Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern”, EOR, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 143–148, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.26650/eor.20221000193.
ISNAD
Yesiltepe, Selin - Kurtuldu, Elif - Bayrakdar, İbrahim Şevki - Yılmaz, Ahmet Berhan. “Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Sphenoid Sinus in Different Sagittal Skeletal Pattern”. European Oral Research 56/3 (September 1, 2022): 143-148. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20221000193.
JAMA
1.Yesiltepe S, Kurtuldu E, Bayrakdar İŞ, Yılmaz AB. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern. EOR. 2022;56:143–148.
MLA
Yesiltepe, Selin, et al. “Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Sphenoid Sinus in Different Sagittal Skeletal Pattern”. European Oral Research, vol. 56, no. 3, Sept. 2022, pp. 143-8, doi:10.26650/eor.20221000193.
Vancouver
1.Selin Yesiltepe, Elif Kurtuldu, İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar, Ahmet Berhan Yılmaz. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern. EOR. 2022 Sep. 1;56(3):143-8. doi:10.26650/eor.20221000193