A study on the discoloration of different dental porcelain systems

Abstract

Purpose:This study aimed to investigate the discoloration of four types of dental porcelain systems (feldspathic, monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, and leucite glassceramic) with various surface treatments (glazed and mechanically polished) after undergoing chewing simulation against a natural tooth antagonist. Materials and Methods:Disc-shaped porcelain groups (9x3mm) were produced for the following categories: feldspathic glazed (FG), feldspathic mechanically polished (FM), zirconia glazed (ZG), zirconia mechanically polished (ZM), lithium disilicate glazed (ExG), lithium disilicate mechanically polished (ExM), leucite glass-ceramic glazed (EG), and leucite glass-ceramic (EM). In vitro chewing simulation was conducted on all porcelain groups, and a spectrophotometer was used to compare the color changes between their initial states. Results:The ΔE values (discoloration) of all porcelain samples were statistically different (p<0.05), and the ΔE values of the glazed samples were higher than those of the mechanically polished samples. Conclusion:All the glazed samples are more likely to show more color change than the mechanically polished sample groups.

Keywords

• Dental ceramics
• color stability
• discoloration
• glaze
• mechanical polish

References

1. Calvani L, Michalakis K, Hirayama H. The influence of full-arch implant-retained fixed dental prostheses on upper lip support and lower facial esthetics: preliminary clinical observations. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007;2:420-8. google scholar
2. Trushkowsky RD. Esthetic Oral Rehabilitation with Veneers: A Guide to Treatment Preparation and Clinical Concepts: Springer Nature; 2020. google scholar
3. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012. google scholar
4. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2013;110:447-54.e10. google scholar
5. Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FB, Braga MM, Sesma N, Özcan M. Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2016;95:985-94. google scholar
6. Kelly JR, Rungruanganunt P, Hunter B, Vailati F. Development of a clinically validated bulk failure test for ceramic crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2010;104:228-38. google scholar
7. Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials. 4 ed: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013. 264 p. google scholar
8. Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2013;110:14-20. google scholar

9. Kim H-K, Kim S-H, Lee J-B, Han J-S, Yeo I-S. Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. jap 2013;5:296-304. google scholar
10. Al-Wahadni A. An in vitro investigation into the surface roughness of 2 glazed, unglazed, and refinished ceramic materials. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985) 2006;37:311-7. google scholar
11. Kawai K, Urano M. Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Operative dentistry 2001;26:396-400. google scholar
12. Bollenl CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dental Materials 1997;13:258-69. google scholar
13. Monaco C, Arena A, Scheda L, Di Fiore A, Zucchelli G. In vitro 2D and 3D roughness and spectrophotometric and gloss analyses of ceramic materials after polishing with different prophylactic pastes. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2020;124:787.e1-.e8. google scholar
14. Sarıkaya I, Yerliyurt K, Hayran Y. Effect of surface finishing on the colour stability and translucency of dental ceramics. BMC Oral Health 2018;18:40. google scholar
15. Dutra D, Pereira G, Kantorski K, Valandro L, Zanatta F. Does Finishing and Polishing of Restorative Materials Affect Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation? A Systematic Review. Operative Dentistry 2018;43:E37-E52. google scholar
16. Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2014;41:314-22. google scholar
17. Kuehni RG, Marcus RT. An Experiment in Visual Scaling of Small Color Differences*. Color Research & Application 1979;4:83-91. google scholar
18. Ardu S, Braut V, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Dietschi D, Feilzer AJ. A long-term laboratory test on staining susceptibility of esthetic composite resin materials. Quintessence Int 2010;41:695-702. google scholar
19. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. Journal of Dentistry 2004;32:3-12. google scholar
20. McLean JW. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2001;85:61-6. google scholar
21. Topcu FT, Sahinkesen G, Yamanel K, Erdemir U, Oktay EA, Ersahan S. Influence of different drinks on the colour stability of dental resin composites. Eur J Dent 2009;3:50-6. google scholar
22. Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Ilie N. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2015;113:534-40. google scholar
23. Sen N, Us YO. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2018;119:593-9. google scholar
24. Kilinc H, Turgut S. Optical behaviors of esthetic CAD-CAM restorations after different surface finishing and polishing procedures and UV aging: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2018;120:107-13. google scholar
25. Vichi A, Fonzar RF, Goracci C, Carrabba M, Ferrari M. Effect of Finishing and Polishing on Roughness and Gloss of Lithium Disilicate and Lithium Silicate Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ceramic for CAD/CAM Systems. Operative Dentistry 2018;43:90-100. google scholar
26. Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF. Surface Evaluation of Polishing Techniques for New Resilient CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 2016;28:56-66. google scholar
27. Kurt M, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Karakoca Nemli S, Turhan Bal B. Effects of glazing methods on the optical and surface properties of silicate ceramics. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:202-9. google scholar
28. Mohammadibassir M, Rezvani MB, Golzari H, Moravej Salehi E, Fahimi MA, Kharazi Fard MJ. Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic. Journal of Prosthodontics 2019;28:e172-e80. google scholar
29. Sasahara RMC, Ribeiro FC, Cesar PF, Yoshimura HN. Influence of the Finishing Technique on Surface Roughness of Dental Porcelains with Different Microstructures. Operative Dentistry 2006;31:577-83. google scholar
30. Flury S, Lussi A, Zimmerli B. Performance of Different Polishing Techniques for Direct CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorations. Operative Dentistry 2010;35:470-81. google scholar
31. Sarikaya I, Güler AU. Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains. Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB 2010;18:10-6. google scholar
32. Kim I-J, Lee Y-K, Lim B-S, Kim C-W. Effect of surface topography on the color of dental porcelain. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 2003;14:405-9. google scholar
33. Coşkun Akar G, Pekkan G, Çal E, Eskitaşçıoğlu G, Özcan M. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2014;112:314-21. google scholar
34. Can Say E, Yurdagüven H, Malkondu Ö, Ünlü N, Soyman M, Kazazoğlu E. The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes on surface roughness of indirect restorative materials. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:962764. google scholar
35. Lai Y-l, Lui H-f, Lee S-y. In vitro color stability, stain resistance, and water sorption of four removable gingival flange materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2003;90:293-300. google scholar
36. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1760-4. google scholar
37. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819-22. google scholar
38. Buyukyilmaz S, Ruyter IE. Color stability of denture base polymers. The International journal of prosthodontics 1994;7:372-82. google scholar
39. Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Möller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dental Materials 1987;3:246-51. google scholar
40. Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 1996;21:73-80. google scholar
41. Yap AU. Color attributes and accuracy of Vita-based manufacturers' shade guides. Oper Dent 1998;23:266-71. google scholar
42. Witkowski S, Yajima N-D, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Reliability of shade selection using an intraoral spectrophotometer. Clinical Oral Investigations 2012;16:945-9. google scholar
43. Kanawati A, Richards MW. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation. Gen Dent 2009;57:323-7. google scholar
44. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Yuzbasioglu E, Bal S. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2006;96:122-8. google scholar
45. Soygun K, Varol O, Ozer A, Bolayir G. Investigations on the effects of mouthrinses on the colour stability and surface roughness of different dental bioceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:200-7. google scholar