Effect of repolishing on the discoloration of indirect composite block, nanohybrid, and microhybrid resin composites

Abstract

Purpose To comparatively assess the color stability of indirect composite block, nanohybrid, and microhybrid resin composites after immersion in red wine and repolishing. Materials and Methods Specimens (2x7x12 mm) were prepared using an indirect composite block (Cerasmart), a nanohybrid (Ceram X), and a microhybrid (Charisma Smart) resin composite. The specimens’ color was recorded based on the CIE L*a*b* system in a spectrophotometer (Spectroshade). After recording the initial color, the specimens were immersed in red wine for 3 hours per day for 15 days. The color measurement was done again. The specimens were repolished with a multistep polishing system (SuperSnap). The color was measured for the third time. The color change values (ΔE) were calculated with the L*, a*, and b* coordinates obtained at baseline, after the immersion procedure, and after repolishing. Statistical analyses were performed with one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc, and paired t-tests (p=0.05). Results The composite block presented the lowest ΔE value (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the ΔE values of the nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites. The repolishing promoted a decrease in the color change of all three materials (p<0.05). The ΔE value of the composite block was clinically acceptable after repolishing. Conclusion The composite block showed higher color stability. The staining resistance of the nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites was not different. The repolishing decreased the discoloration of all three materials.

Keywords

• CAD/CAM
• color
• composite dental resin
• polishing
• staining

References

1. 1. Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J. 2011;56 Suppl 1:59-66.
2. 2. Ferracane JL. Resin composite--state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29-38.
3. 3. Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices. Odontology. 2017;105(2):162-169.
4. 4. Ardu S, Duc O, Di Bella E, Krejci I, Daher R. Color stability of different composite resins after polishing. Odontology 2018;106:328–33.
5. 5. Mundim FM, Garcia L da FR, Pires-de-Souza F de CP. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:249–54.
6. 6. Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res 2016;95:487–95.
7. 7. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232–4.
8. 8. Kang YA, Lee HA, Chang J, Moon W, Chung SH, Lim BS. Color stability of dental reinforced CAD/CAM hybrid composite blocks compared to regular blocks. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:1–17.

9. 9. Seyidaliyeva A, Rues S, Evagorou Z, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P, Zenthöfer A. Color stability of polymer-infiltrated-ceramics compared with lithium disilicate ceramics and composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:43–50.
10. 10. Aydın N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Kılıçarslan MA. Investigating the color changes on resin-based CAD/CAM Blocks. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:251–6. 11. Choi YS, Kang KH, Att W. Evaluation of the response of esthetic restorative materials to ultraviolet aging. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:679–85.
11. 12. Stamenković DD, Tango RN, Todorović A, Karasan D, Sailer I, Paravina RD. Staining and aging-dependent changes in color of CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:672–8.
12. 13. Sulaiman TA, Rodgers B, Suliman AA, Johnston WM. Color and translucency stability of contemporary resin-based restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:899–905.
13. 14. Muhittin U, Burak TU, Kam HO. Color stability of microhybrid and nanofilled composite resins: Effect of surface sealant agents containing different filler content. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20:1045–50.
14. 15. Ren YF, Feng L, Serban D, Malmstrom HS. Effects of common beverage colorants on color stability of dental composite resins: the utility of a thermocycling stain challenge model in vitro. J Dent 2012;40 Suppl 1.
15. 16. De Alencar e Silva Leite ML, Da Cunha Medeiros e Silva FDS, Meireles SS, Duarte RM, Maciel Andrade AK. The effect of drinks on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposites. Eur J Dent 2014;8:330–6.
16. 17. Fonseca ASQS, Labruna Moreira AD, de Albuquerque PPAC, de Menezes LR, Pfeifer CS, Schneider LFJ. Effect of monomer type on the CC degree of conversion, water sorption and solubility, and color stability of model dental composites. Dent Mater 2017;33:394–401.
17. 18. Mailart MC, Rocha RS, Mondragón Contreras SC, Torres CRG, Borges AB, Caneppele TMF. Effects of artificial staining on bulk-filled resin composites. Am J Dent 2018;31:144–8.
18. 19. ERSÖZ B, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Aydın N. Color stability and surface roughness of resin based direct and indirect restorative materials. Eur Ann Dent Sci 2021;48:1–6.
19. 20. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27:S1–9.
20. 21. Liberato WF, Barreto IC, Costa PP, de Almeida CC, Pimentel W, Tiossi R. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:271–5.
21. 22. Saegusa M, Kurokawa H, Takahashi N, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, Shiratsuchi K, et al. Evaluation of Color-matching Ability of a Structural Colored Resin Composite. Oper Dent 2021 ;46:306–15.
22. 23. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Özcan M, Hämmerle CHF. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:377–83.
23. 24. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 2005;33:389–98.
24. 25. Gajewski VES, Pfeifer CS, Fróes-Salgado NRG, Boaro LCC, Braga RR. Monomers used in resin composites: degree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption/solubility. Braz Dent J 2012;23:508–14.
25. 26. Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leloup G, Leprince JG. Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2016;32:1586–99.
26. 27. Ardu S, Braut V, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Dietschi D, Feilzer AJ. A long-term laboratory test on staining susceptibility of esthetic composite resin materials. Quintessence Int. 2010;41(8):695-702.
27. 28. Poggio C, Scribante A, Colombo M, Beltrami R, Chiesa M. Surface discoloration of composite resins: Effects of staining and bleaching. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:567.
28. 29. Anfe TEDA, Agra CM, Vieira GF. Evaluation of the possibility of removing staining by repolishing composite resins submitted to artificial aging. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:260–7.
29. 30. Fontes ST, Fernández MR, de Moura CM, Meireles SS. Color stability of a nanofill composite: effect of different immersion media. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:388–91.
30. 31. Malhotra N, Shenoy RP, Acharya S, Shenoy R, Mayya S. Effect of three indigenous food stains on resin-based, microhybrid-, and nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:250–7.