Research Article

Resistance of CAD/CAM material surfaces to aging: a comparison of translucency, gloss, and roughness

Volume: 59 Number: 3 October 8, 2025
EN

Resistance of CAD/CAM material surfaces to aging: a comparison of translucency, gloss, and roughness

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of artificial aging on the surface properties of CAD/CAM restorative materials by assessing changes in translucency, gloss, and surface roughness. Materials and Methods: Three CAD/CAM materials were tested: Cerasmart, Vita Enamic, and Initial LRF. Specimens were prepared and polished using three different finishing and polishing systems: Optiglaze Color, OptraFine Polishing System, and Vita Enamic Polishing Set Clinical. Surface roughness was measured using a non-contact laser profilometer. Translucency was evaluated with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer, and gloss was determined using a glossmeter. The specimens were stored in 0.02-N citric acid solution for seven days and subjected to a toothbrush abrasion procedure. All surface parameter measurements were repeated after aging. Results: Before aging, the OptraFine Polishing System provided the smoothest surfaces for Cerasmart and Vita Enamic, while Optiglaze Color resulted in the smoothest surfaces for Initial LRF. After aging, a significant decrease in light transmittance was observed in all materials regardless of the finishing and polishing method used (p<0.014 for Cerasmart, p = 0.001 for Vita Enamic/Initial LRF before aging; p<0.001 for Cerasmart/Vita Enamic, p = 0.003 for Initial LRF after aging). Statistically significant differences in surface roughness (Ra, Rz, and Sa values) were found among the polishing methods for all materials (p<0.001). Optiglaze Color consistently resulted in the highest gloss values across all materials. Conclusion: Aging had a significant impact on the surface properties of CAD/CAM materials, with variations depending on the material type and polishing system used. Light transmission decreased significantly in all materials after aging. The choice of finishing and polishing technique plays a critical role in maintaining the aesthetic properties of CAD/CAM materials over time.

Keywords

References

  1. Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF. Surface evaluation of polishing techniques for new resilient CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28:56-66. google scholar
  2. Imazato S, Tarumi H, Kobayashi K, et al. Relationship between the degree of conversion and internal discoloration of light-activated composite. Dent Mater J 1995; 14:23-30. google scholar
  3. Bottino MC, Valandro LF, Kantorski KZ, et al. Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic. Braz Dent J 2006; 17:285-9. google scholar
  4. Dalkiz M, Sipahi C, Beydemir B. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material. J Prosthodont 2009; 18:217-22. google scholar
  5. Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, et al. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8:417-22. google scholar
  6. Arimoto A, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, et al. Translucency, opalescence and light transmission characteristics of light-cured resin composites. Dent Mater 2010; 26:1090-7. google scholar
  7. Vichi A, Fabian Fonzar R, Goracci C, et al. Effect of finishing and polishing on roughness and gloss of lithium disilicate and lithium silicate zirconia reinforced glass-ceramic for CAD/CAM systems. Oper Dent 2018; 43:90-100. google scholar
  8. Kilinc H, Turgut S. Optical behaviors of esthetic CAD-CAM restorations after different surface finishing and polishing procedures and UV aging: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120:107-13. google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Dental Materials and Equipment, Prosthodontics, Restorative Dentistry

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 8, 2025

Submission Date

May 24, 2024

Acceptance Date

November 4, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 59 Number: 3

APA
Sancak, E. İ., Tekçe, N., Fidan, S., & Balcı, S. (2025). Resistance of CAD/CAM material surfaces to aging: a comparison of translucency, gloss, and roughness. European Oral Research, 59(3), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251488741
AMA
1.Sancak Eİ, Tekçe N, Fidan S, Balcı S. Resistance of CAD/CAM material surfaces to aging: a comparison of translucency, gloss, and roughness. EOR. 2025;59(3):158-165. doi:10.26650/eor.20251488741
Chicago
Sancak, Elif İlgi, Neslihan Tekçe, Sinan Fidan, and Sibel Balcı. 2025. “Resistance of CAD CAM Material Surfaces to Aging: A Comparison of Translucency, Gloss, and Roughness”. European Oral Research 59 (3): 158-65. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251488741.
EndNote
Sancak Eİ, Tekçe N, Fidan S, Balcı S (October 1, 2025) Resistance of CAD/CAM material surfaces to aging: a comparison of translucency, gloss, and roughness. European Oral Research 59 3 158–165.
IEEE
[1]E. İ. Sancak, N. Tekçe, S. Fidan, and S. Balcı, “Resistance of CAD/CAM material surfaces to aging: a comparison of translucency, gloss, and roughness”, EOR, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 158–165, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.26650/eor.20251488741.
ISNAD
Sancak, Elif İlgi - Tekçe, Neslihan - Fidan, Sinan - Balcı, Sibel. “Resistance of CAD CAM Material Surfaces to Aging: A Comparison of Translucency, Gloss, and Roughness”. European Oral Research 59/3 (October 1, 2025): 158-165. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251488741.
JAMA
1.Sancak Eİ, Tekçe N, Fidan S, Balcı S. Resistance of CAD/CAM material surfaces to aging: a comparison of translucency, gloss, and roughness. EOR. 2025;59:158–165.
MLA
Sancak, Elif İlgi, et al. “Resistance of CAD CAM Material Surfaces to Aging: A Comparison of Translucency, Gloss, and Roughness”. European Oral Research, vol. 59, no. 3, Oct. 2025, pp. 158-65, doi:10.26650/eor.20251488741.
Vancouver
1.Elif İlgi Sancak, Neslihan Tekçe, Sinan Fidan, Sibel Balcı. Resistance of CAD/CAM material surfaces to aging: a comparison of translucency, gloss, and roughness. EOR. 2025 Oct. 1;59(3):158-65. doi:10.26650/eor.20251488741