Research Article

Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial

Volume: 56 Number: 1 January 31, 2022
EN

Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and calcium hydroxide pulp capping after complete caries removal. Materials and Methods In 73 regular patients (47 women, 26 men; age 20.65±3.02 years), having at least one deep carious lesion was recruited. Following complete caries removal, the pulp was indirectly capped with either MTA(n=51) or calcium hydroxide (n =49), randomly. Final restoration with a resin-based composite in a single session was performed. Clinical parameters including pulp vitality, sensitivity to cold or heat stimulants, percussion tests and discomfort during chewing and color were recorded after 6 months, 1 year, 2- year, 3- year and 4- year. Data were analysed statistically (p < 0.05). Results After 4- year, the survival rates were 86% (for MTA), and 82.9% (for calcium hydroxide). Totally, 8 teeth from calcium hydroxide group and 7 teeth from MTA group were endodontically treated. No significant difference was detected between the groups in terms of pulp vitality (p=0.613). Grey discoloration rate was 63% in MTA group. Conclusion Both pulp-capping materials, MTA and calcium hydroxide showed similar clinically successful performance in terms of pulp vitality in the treatment of deep dentin caries lesions after 4- year. 

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Hacettepe Üniversitesi

References

  1. 1. Schwendicke F. Contemporary concepts in carious tissue removal: A review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(6):403-408.
  2. 1. Schwendicke F. Contemporary concepts in carious tissue removal: A review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(6):403-408.
  3. 2. Seux D, Couble ML, Hartmann DJ, Gauthier JP, Magloire H. Odontoblast-like cytodifferentiation of human dental pulp cells in vitro in the presence of a calcium hydroxide-containing cement. Arch Oral Biol. 1991;36(2):117-128.
  4. 2. Seux D, Couble ML, Hartmann DJ, Gauthier JP, Magloire H. Odontoblast-like cytodifferentiation of human dental pulp cells in vitro in the presence of a calcium hydroxide-containing cement. Arch Oral Biol. 1991;36(2):117-128.
  5. 3. Tziafas D, Pantelidou O, Alvanou A, Belibasakis G, Papadimitriou S. The dentinogenic effect of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in short-term capping experiments. Int Endod J. 2002;35(3):245-254.
  6. 3. Tziafas D, Pantelidou O, Alvanou A, Belibasakis G, Papadimitriou S. The dentinogenic effect of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in short-term capping experiments. Int Endod J. 2002;35(3):245-254.
  7. 4. D'Arcangelo C, Di Nardo-Di Maio F, Patrono C, Caputi S. NOS evaluations in human dental pulp-capping with MTA and calcium-hydroxide. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007;20(1 Suppl 1):27-32.
  8. 4. D'Arcangelo C, Di Nardo-Di Maio F, Patrono C, Caputi S. NOS evaluations in human dental pulp-capping with MTA and calcium-hydroxide. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007;20(1 Suppl 1):27-32.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Dentistry

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 31, 2022

Submission Date

May 15, 2021

Acceptance Date

August 6, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 56 Number: 1

APA
Koç Vural, U., Kiremitci, A., & Gökalp, S. (2022). Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial. European Oral Research, 56(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022895748
AMA
1.Koç Vural U, Kiremitci A, Gökalp S. Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial. EOR. 2022;56(1):35-41. doi:10.26650/eor.2022895748
Chicago
Koç Vural, Uzay, Arlin Kiremitci, and Saadet Gökalp. 2022. “Which Is the Most Effective Biomaterial in Indirect Pulp Capping? 4- Year Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial”. European Oral Research 56 (1): 35-41. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022895748.
EndNote
Koç Vural U, Kiremitci A, Gökalp S (January 1, 2022) Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial. European Oral Research 56 1 35–41.
IEEE
[1]U. Koç Vural, A. Kiremitci, and S. Gökalp, “Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial”, EOR, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 35–41, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.26650/eor.2022895748.
ISNAD
Koç Vural, Uzay - Kiremitci, Arlin - Gökalp, Saadet. “Which Is the Most Effective Biomaterial in Indirect Pulp Capping? 4- Year Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial”. European Oral Research 56/1 (January 1, 2022): 35-41. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022895748.
JAMA
1.Koç Vural U, Kiremitci A, Gökalp S. Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial. EOR. 2022;56:35–41.
MLA
Koç Vural, Uzay, et al. “Which Is the Most Effective Biomaterial in Indirect Pulp Capping? 4- Year Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial”. European Oral Research, vol. 56, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 35-41, doi:10.26650/eor.2022895748.
Vancouver
1.Uzay Koç Vural, Arlin Kiremitci, Saadet Gökalp. Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial. EOR. 2022 Jan. 1;56(1):35-41. doi:10.26650/eor.2022895748