Root canal length measurement of molar teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT): comparison of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional methods

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the validity of 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) root canal length measurements of molar teeth compared with actual root canal lengths and the influence of canal curvature on the accuracy of CBCT measurements. Materials and Methods Seventy root canals of 24 molar teeth were scanned using CBCT, and the root canals were categorized as; ‘straight/curved,’ ‘highly curved,’ and ‘multiple curved.’ The 2D measurements were performed within a suitable slice between the major foramen and the corresponding cusp. The 3D measurements were performed within the slices in regular intervals of axial planes in between the same reference points. The reproducibility and reliability of the methods were analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient. Differences between the actual and CBCT root canal lengths were evaluated by chi-square and McNemar tests if the measurements were within acceptable limits of ±0.5 mm. Results Both methods were found to be reproducible and presented excellent reliability. However, the 3D method was significantly more accurate, with an 85.7% frequency of measurements within acceptable limits (p<0.05). In ‘multiple curved’ root canals, the 3D method presented more reliable measurements than the 2D method. For ‘straight/curved’ root canals, the 2D method gave results significantly closer to the actual root canal length in comparison with ‘highly curved’ root canals (p<0.05). Conclusion The 3D measurements are more accurate than 2D measurements. If an already existing CBCT is present, it could be an alternative method for predetermination of root canal lengths in molar teeth.

Keywords

• Cone-beam computed tomography
• Root canal
• Two-dimensional
• Three-dimensional
• Endodontics

References

1. 1. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:609-25. [CrossRef] google scholar
2. 2. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg OralMed Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:114-9. [CrossRef] google scholar
3. 3. Patel S, Dawood A, Pitt Ford T, Whaites E. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2009;42:463-75. [CrossRef] google scholar
4. 4. de Paula-Silva FW, Wu MK, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Wesselink PR. Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod. 2009;35:1009-12. [CrossRef] google scholar
5. 5. Metska ME, Aartman IH, Wesselink PR, Özok AR. Detection of vertical root fractures in vivo in endodontically treated teeth by cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 2012;38:1344-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
6. 6. Shemesh H, Cristescu R, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The use of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs to diagnose root perforations. J Endod 2011;37:513-6.[CrossRef] google scholar
7. 7. Kamburoglu K, Kursun S, Yuksel S, Oztas B. Observer ability to detect ex vivo simulated internal or external cervical root resorption. J Endod 2011;37:168-75. [CrossRef] google scholar
8. 8. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:126-30. [CrossRef] google scholar

9. 9. Bornstein MM, Wölner-Hanssen AB, Sendi P, von Arx T. Comparison of intraoral radiography and limited cone beam computed tomography for the assessment of root-fractured permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2009;25:571-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
10. 10. Demirbuga S, Sekerci AE, Dincer AN, Cayabatmaz M, Zorba YO. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:737-44. [CrossRef] google scholar
11. 11. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod 2010;36:1187-90. [CrossRef] google scholar
12. 12. Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Shemesh H, Roig M, Lemberg K. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics—a review. Int Endod J 2015;48:3-15. [CrossRef] google scholar
13. 13. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008;34:273-9. [CrossRef] google scholar
14. 14. American Association of Endodontists, American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. AAE and AAOMR joint position statement use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics 2015 update. J Endod 2015;41:1393-6. [CrossRef] google scholar
15. 15. Caglayan F, Tozoglu U. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial region detected by cone beam CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012;18:159-63. [CrossRef] google scholar
16. 16. Oser DG, Henson BR, Shiang EY, Finkelman MD, Amato RB. Incidental Findings in Small Field of View Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scans. J Endod 2017;43:901-4. [CrossRef] google scholar
17. 17. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:100-8. [CrossRef] google scholar
18. 18. Connert T, Hulber JM, Godt A, Löst C, ElAyouti A. Accuracy of endodontic working length determination using cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47:698-703. [CrossRef] google scholar
19. 19. Tchorz JP, Poxleitner PJ, Stampf S, Patzelt SBM, Rottke D, Hellwig E, et al. The use of cone beam computed tomography to predetermine root canal lengths in molar teeth: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1129-33. [CrossRef] google scholar
20. 20. Yılmaz F, Kamburoglu K, Senel B. Endodontic Working Length Measurement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images Obtained at Different Voxel Sizes and Field of Views, Periapical Radiography, and Apex Locator: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study. J Endod 2017;43:152-6. [CrossRef] google scholar
21. 21. Segato AVK, Piasecki L, Felipe Iparraguirre Nunovero M, da Silva Neto UX, Westphalen VPD, Gambarini G, Carneiro E. The Accuracy of a New Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Software in the Preoperative Working Length Determination Ex Vivo. J Endod 2018;44:1024-9. [CrossRef] google scholar
22. 22. Metska ME, Liem VM, Parsa A, Koolstra JH, Wesselink PR, Ozok AR. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scans in Comparison with Periapical Radiographs for Root Canal Length Measurement: An In Situ Study. J Endod 2014;40:1206-9. [CrossRef] google scholar
23. 23. Janner SF, Jeger FB, Lussi A, Bornstein MM. Precision of endodontic working length measurements: a pilot investigation comparing cone-beam computed tomography scanning with standard measurement techniques. J Endod 2011;37:1046-51. [CrossRef] google scholar
24. 24. Jeger FB, Janner SF, Bornstein MM, Lussi A. Endodontic working length measurement with preexisting cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a prospective, controlled clinical study. J Endod 2012;38:884-8. [CrossRef] google scholar
25. 25. Ustun Y, Aslan T, Sekerci AE, Sagsen B. Evaluation of the Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scanning and Electronic Apex Locator Measurements in Working Length Determination of Teeth with Large Periapical Lesions. J Endod 2016;42:1334-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
26. 26. Lucena C, Lopez JM, Martin JA, Robles V, Gonzalez-Rodriguez MP. Accuracy of working length measurement: electronic apex locator versus cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47:246-56. [CrossRef] google scholar
27. 27. Tchorz JP, Wolgin M, Karygianni L, Vach K, Altenburger MJ. Accuracy of CBCT-based root canal length predetermination using new endodontic planning software compared to measurements performed with an electronic apex locator ex vivo. Int J Comput Dent 2018;21:323-8. google scholar
28. 28. Tchorz JP, Wrbas KT, Von See C, Vach K, Patzelt SBM. Accuracy of Software Based Three-Dimensional Root Canal Length Measurements Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Eur Endod J 2019;4:28-32. [CrossRef] google scholar