Child perceptions questionnaire 11-14 in Turkish language in an orthodontic patient sample

Year 2018, Volume: 52 Issue: 1, 39 - 44, 03.01.2018

Cihan Aydoğan Ahmet Can Yılmaz Arzu Alagöz Dilruba Sanya Sadıkzade

Abstract

DOI: 10.26650/eor.2018.07379

Purpose

The Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11-14
(CPQ 11-14) is a generic tool that was developed to measure oral health-related
quality of life in early adolescents. The aim of this study was to prepare a
Turkish version of the CPQ 11-14 and to test its psychometric properties in an
adolescent orthodontic patient sample.

Materials and Methods

The questionnaire was adapted to Turkish
using a forward backward translation method, and it was found to be
understandable in a pilot study (n=15). The Turkish version of the CPQ 11-14
was administered to 200 orthodontic consultation patients (aged 11–14 years).
Retests were conducted in 50 patients 2 weeks after the first tests. The ICON
index was used to determine the orthodontic treatment need. Decayed, missing,
and filled teeth were also recorded with the DMFT index. Spearman correlations
and t-tests were used to assess validity. Internal consistency was assessed
using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficients were
calculated to assess test–retest reliability.

Results

Significant positive correlations were
found between CPQ 11-14 scores and the global ratings of oral health (r=0.381),
global ratings of well-being (r=0.350), ICON scores (r=0.211), and DMFT scores (r=0.233),
supporting construct validity. Children who needed orthodontic treatment had a
worse quality of life than those who did not need orthodontic treatment
(p=0.016). Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients were
calculated as 0.917 and 0.817, respectively, demonstrating good internal
consistency and acceptable test–retest reliability.

Conclusion

The Turkish version of the CPQ 11-14 was
found to be valid and reliable in 11–14-year-old orthodontic patients.

Keywords

Orthodontics, quality of life, child perceptions questionnaire, validation, Turkish

References

• 1. Engel G. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129-36. 2. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of Quality-of-Life Outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 835-40. 3. WHO. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 153-9. 4. Broder HL. Children’s oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007; 35: 5-7. 5. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 459-63. 6. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health 2004; 21: 161-9. 7. Broder HL, McGrath C, Cisneros GJ. Questionnaire development: face validity and item impact testing of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007; 35: 8-19. 8. Gilchrist F, Rodd H, Deery C, Marshman Z. Assessment of the quality of measures of child oral health-related quality of life. BMC Oral Health 2014; 14: 40. 9. Cunningham S, Hunt N. Quality of life and its importance in orthodontics. J Orthod 2001; 28: 152-8. 10. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3186-91. 11. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1417-32. 12. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17: 268-74. 13. Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod 2000; 27: 149-62. 14. McGrath C, Pang HN, Lo ECM, King NM, Hägg U, Samman N. Translation and evaluation of a Chinese version of the Child Oral Health-related Quality of Life measure. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18: 267-74. 15. Olivieri A, Ferro R, Benacchio L, Besostri A, Stellini E. Validity of Italian version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire ( CPQ 11-14 ). BMC Oral Health 2013; 13: 1-7. 16. Barbosa T, Tureli MCM, Gavião MBD. Validity and reliability of the Child Perceptions Questionnaires applied in Brazilian children. BMC Oral Health 2009; 9: 1-8. 17. Bekes K, John MT, Zyriax R, Schaller H-G, Hirsch C. The German version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G11-14): Translation process, reliability, and validity in the general population. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 165-71. 18. Brown A, Al-Khayal Z. Validity and reliability of the Arabic translation of the child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaire (CPQ 11 − 14) in Saudi Arabia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16: 405-11. 19. Goursand D, Paiva SM, Zarzar PM, Ramos- ML, Cornacchia GM, Pordeus IA, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11 – 14 ( CPQ 11–14) for the Brazilian Portuguese language. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 1-7. 20. Marshman Z, Rodd H, Stern M, Mitchell C, Locker D, Jokovic A, Robinson PG. An evaluation of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire in the UK. Community Dent Health 2005; 22: 151-5. 21. Turton BJ, Thomson WM, Foster Page L a, Saub RB, Razak IA. Validation of an Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Measure for Cambodian Children. Asia Pac J Public Health 2015; 27: NP2339-49. 22. Wogelius P, Gjørup H, Haubek D, Lopez R, Poulsen S. Development of Danish version of child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaires (CPQ8-10 and CPQ11-14). BMC Oral Health 2009; 9: 11. 23. Guyatt G, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 622-9. 24. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42. 25. O’Brien K, Wright JL, Conboy F, Macfarlane T, Mandall N. The child perception questionnaire is valid for malocclusions in the United Kingdom. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 129: 536-40. 26. O’Brien C, Benson PE, Marshman Z. Evaluation of a quality of life measure for children with malocclusion. J Orthod 2007; 34: 185-93. 27. Kok YV, Mageson P, Harradine NW, Sprod AJ. Comparing a quality of life measure and the aesthetic component of the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) in assessing orthodontic treatment need and concern. J Orthod 2004; 31: 312-8. 28. Bos A, Hoogstraten J, Prahl-Andersen B. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 123: 127-32. 29. Polit DF. Getting serious about test-retest reliability: A critique of retest research and some recommendations. Qual Life Res 2014; 23: 1713-20. 30. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning : An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess 2003; 80: 99-103.