Quality of communicating design features for cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 54 Sayı: 3, 123 - 129, 05.01.2021

Mohammad Zakaria Nassani Mazen Saeed Alotaibi

https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200117

Öz

Purpose: This survey aimed to investigate quality of communicating design features for the construction of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures (RPDs) among dentists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A survey of nine commercial dental laboratories located in Riyadh was carried out. In each visit, master casts for cobalt chromium RPDs and dentists’ prescriptions were examined. A quality score for the provided instructions was developed and ranged from 0 to 4. A zero score means that no instructions were sent from the dentist for the design of the RPD. A score of 4 means that instructions were provided for the design of four main elements of the RPD, i.e., shape of major connector, type of direct retainers, position of direct retainers, position of dental rests.
Results: 162 dentists’ prescriptions for RPDs and related casts were assessed. The majority of RPD cases were designed by the dental technician alone (64.2%). Shape of the major connector was the most frequent element in dentists’ prescriptions (35.8%). The mean quality score of dentists’ instructions was 0.96 (sd=1.54). 18% of the provided instructions achieved quality score equal to 4. Prescriptions for Kennedy Class III cases achieved significantly higher mean quality score compared to Kennedy Class II cases (p<0.05). 16.7% of the evaluated casts had clearly defined rest seat preparation.
Conclusion: The results of this survey indicate inadequate quality of communicating the design features of cobalt chromium RPDs among practicing dentists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The reliance on the dental technician to design the cast RPDs seems to be high.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Quality, design, cobalt chromium, removable, partial dentures, Saudi Arabia

Destekleyen Kurum

The authors declared that they have received no financial support.

Teşekkür

The authors would like to express their deep gratitude to the managers and staff of the surveyed dental laboratories for their invaluable assistance over the period of this survey. Many thanks and gratitude for the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Dar Al Uloom University for the assistance in publication of this research.

Kaynakça

• 1. Jones JD, Turkyilmaz I, Garcia LT. Removable partial dentures--treatment now and for the future. Tex Dent J 2010; 127:365-72.
• 2. Wöstmann B, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Jepson N, Mushimoto E, Palmqvist S, Sofou A, Owall B. Indications for removable partial dentures: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18:139-45.
• 3. Nassani MZ, Tarakji B, Baroudi K, Sakka S. Reappraisal of the removable partial denture as a treatment option for the shortened dental arch. Eur J Dent 2013; 7:251- 6.
• 4. Xie Q, Ding T, Yang G. Rehabilitation of oral function with removable dentures--still an option? J Oral Rehabil 2015; 42:234-42.
• 5. Kleinman ER, Harper PR, Gallagher JE. Trends in NHS primary dental care for older people in England: Implications for the future. Gerodontology 2009; 26:193‑201.
• 6. White DA, Tsakos G, Pitts NB, Fuller E, Douglas GV, Murray JJ, Steele JG. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009: common oral health conditions and their impact on the population. Br Dent J 2012; 213:567-72.
• 7. Watt RG, Steele JG, Treasure ET, White DA, Pitts NB, Murray JJ. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009: Implications of findings for clinical practice and oral health policy. Br Dent J 2013; 214:71‑5.
• 8. Carlsson GE, Omar R. Trends in prosthodontics. Med Princ Pract 2006; 15:167-79.
• 9. Müller F, Naharro M, Carlsson GE. What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:2-14.
• 10. Petersen PE, Kandelman D, Arpin S, Ogawa H. Global oral health of older people--call for public health action. Community Dent Health 2010; 27:257-67.
• 11. Al-Shammery AR. Demand for Dental Care in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 1987; 7: 327-9.
• 12. Al-Fawaz, A. Needs and demands for dental treatment among Saudi female patients in the dental school in Riyadh. Saudi Dent J 1999; 11: 120-3.
• 13. Al-Ghannam NA, Al-Shammery AR, Wyne AH, Khan NB. Prosthetic dental treatment needs in Eastern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2002; 23:975-80.
• 14. Al-Shehri SAM. Oral health status of older people in residential homes in Saudi Arabia. Open J Stomatol 2012; 2, 307-13
• 15. Peeran SA, Al Sanabani F, AL-Makramani BM, Elamin EI. Dental prosthetic status and treatment needs of adult population in Jizan, Saudi Arabia: A survey report. Eur J Dent 2016; 10:459-63.
• 16. Fouda SM, Al-Harbi FA, Khan SQ, Virtanen JI, Raustia A. Missing teeth and prosthetic treatment in patients treated at College of Dentistry, University of Dammam. Int J Dent 2017; 2017:7593540. doi: 10.1155/2017/7593540.
• 17. Nassani MZ. Aspects of malpractice in Prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2017; 26: 672-81.
• 18. EC Medical Devices Directive No 10. Guidelines to Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC for Manufacturers of Custom-Made Dental Devices. Dublin: Department of Health and Children; 1997.
• 19. British Society for the Study of Prosthetic Dentistry. Guidelines in Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Company, 1996.
• 20. Vult von Steyern P, Widolf-Kroon R, Nilner K, Basker RM. Removable partial denture design habits in general dental practice in Sweden. Swed Dent J 1995; 19:205-11.
• 21. Sykora O. Removable partial denture design by Canadian dental laboratories: a retrospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 1995; 61:615-21.
• 22. Carneiro LC. Specifications provided by practitioners for the fabrication of removable acrylic prostheses in Tanzania. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33:660-5.
• 23. Radhi A, Lynch CD, Hannigan A. Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34:153-7.
• 24. Kilfeather GP, Lynch CD, Sloan AJ, Youngson CC. Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37:300-5.
• 25. Avrampou M, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Pissiotis A, Katsoulis J, Doukoudakis A. Design of removable partial dentures: a survey of dental laboratories in Greece. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25:66-9.
• 26. Haj-Ali R, Al Quran F, Adel O. Dental laboratory communication regarding removable dental prosthesis design in the UAE. J Prosthodont 2012; 21:425-8.
• 27. Sui L, Wu X, Wu S, Gao P, Li R. The quality of written instructions for dental prostheses in China. J Prosthodont 2014; 23:602-9.
• 28. Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A. The Quality of written prescriptions received at dental laboratories in Tabriz, Iran. Glob J Health Sci 2016; 8: 266-75.
• 29. Ali SA, Khalifa N, Alhajj MN. Communication between dentists and dental technicians during the fabrication of removable partial dentures in Khartoum State, Sudan. Acta Stomatol Croat 2018; 52:246-53.
• 30. Nassani MZ, Devlin H, Tarakji B, McCord JF. Designing cobalt chromium removable partial dentures for patients with shortened dental arches–a pilot survey. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38: 608-14.
• 31. Al-Hallak KR, Nassani MZ, Heskul MM, Doumani MD, Darwish M. Reasons for choosing dentistry as a career among dental students in Saudi Arabia. Eur J Dent 2018; 12:275-80.
• 32. Saudi Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Statistical Year Book 2017. https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/Book/Pages/default.aspx. pdf Accessed Aug 11, 2018.
• 33. Alshahrani AM, Raheel SA. Health-care system and accessibility of dental services in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: An update. J Int Oral Health 2016; 8:883-7.
• 34. Al-AlSheikh HM. Quality of communication between dentists and dental technicians for fixed and removable prosthodontics. King Saud Univ J Dent Sci 2012; 3:55–60.
• 35. Tulbah H, AlHamdan E, AlQahtani A , AlShahrani A , AlShaye M. Quality of communication between dentists and dental laboratory technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2017; 29:111-6.
• 36. Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, Seymour DW. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118:273-80.
• 37. Polychronakis N, Sotiriou M, Zissis A. A survey of removable partial denture casts and major connector designs found in commercial laboratories, Athens, Greece. J Prosthodont 2013; 22:245-9.
• 38. Basker RM, Harrison A, Davenport JC, Marshall JL. Partial denture design in general dental practice – 10 years on. Br Dent J 1988; 165:245–9.
• 39. Lynch CD, Allen PF. A survey of chrome-cobalt RPD design in Ireland. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:362–4.
• 40. Lynch CD, Allen PF. Quality of written prescriptions and master impressions for fixed and removable prosthodontics: a comparative study. Br Dent J 2005; 198:17-20.
• 41. Lynch CD, Allen PF. Why do dentists struggle with removable partial denture design? An assessment of financial and educational issues. Br Dent J 2006; 200:277-81.
• 42. Basker RM, Davenport JC. A survey of partial denture design in general dental practice. J Oral Rehabil 1978; 5:215–22.
• 43. Bates JF, Addy M. Partial dentures and plaque accumulation. J Dent 1978; 6:285–93.
• 44. Tomlin HR, Osborne J. Cobalt-chromium partial dentures. A clinical survey. Br Dent J 1961; 110:307–10.
• 45. Rice JA, Lynch CD, McAndrew R, Milward PJ. Tooth preparation for rest seats for cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures completed by general dental practitioners. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38:72–8.