The effects of dental adhesives total etch; self-etch and selective etch application procedures on microleakage in class II composite restorations

Year 2023, Volume: 57 Issue: 3, 151 - 158, 28.09.2023

Mustafa Yollar , Serpil Karaoğlanoğlu , Elif Tuğba Altıparmak , Elif Aybala Oktay , Numan Aydın , Bilge Ersöz

https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231197657

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the amount of microleakage resulting from the application of self-etch, selective etch, etch-and-rinse of adhesive systems in class II cavities. Material and Methods: Four adhesive systems with etch-and-rinse, selective etch and self etch methods were used on the extracted teeth. All groups were restored with G-aenial A'CHORD (Nanohybrid) (GC, Tokyo, Japan) A2 composite. After 1000 thermal cycles were applied to the teeth after restoration, the samples were kept in 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 hours. Microleakage values formed after dye penetration with basic fuchsin were determined quantitatively by scoring method on sections taken from each sample in the mesiodistal direction. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test were used for statistical analysis of the data (p<0.05).
Results: While there was no statistically significant difference between the etch-and-rinse and selective etch applications of adhesive systems (G2-Bond Universal, Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal Prime&Bond Universal and Tokuyama Bond Force II) (p>0.05), there was a statistically significant difference in self-etch application (p<0.05). As a result of Prime&Bond Universal's self-etch application, it showed statistically more microleakage than the other three adhesive systems (p<0.05).
Conclusion: It has been observed that additional etching of enamel and/or dentin with phosphoric acid reduces the amount of microleakage.

Keywords

Adhesion, multimodal adhesive systems, etch-and-rinse adhesives, self-etch adhesives, selective etch

References

• Qualtrough AJE, Satterthwaite JD, Morrow LA, Brun 'A. Principles of operative dentistry. London: Wiley-Blackwell 2005. google scholar
• Yip HK, Samaranayake LP. Caries removal techniques aı instrumentation: a review. Clin Oral Investig1998; 2: 148-54. google scholar
• Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Review Recent Advancesin the Theory and Mechanism of Adhesive Resin Bondingto Dentin: A Critical Review. Inc. J Biomed Mater Res PartB: Appl Biomater 2009; 88: 558-78. google scholar
• Jensen ME. Dentin bonding agents. Esthetic Dentistry / A clinical approach to techniques and materials (Aschheim KW, Dale BG ed). Second edition. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc. 2001, p.41-43. google scholar
• Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 528-34. google scholar
• Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Reich SM, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Tay FR. Characterisation of resin-dentine interfaces by compressive cyclic loading. Biomaterials 2005; 26:2043-52. google scholar
• Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 175-90. google scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28. google scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. Fundamentals of operative dentistry (Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS, ed). Second edition. Carol Stream, Quintessence 2001, p.178-235. google scholar
• Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Di Lenarda R, Petschelt A, Breschi L. Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 517-24. google scholar
• Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 45-64. google scholar
• Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Karafili D, Verniani G, Zucca G, Ferrari M. Microleakage of three different combinations of adhesive and composite resins. J Osseointegr 2021; 13: 115-20. google scholar
• Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a Phenyl-P self etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1212-20. google scholar
• Ferracene DJ, Adoy P, Matsimo H, Mark VA. Relationship between shade and depth of cure for light-cured composites. Dent Mater 1988; 2: 80-4. google scholar
• Lacy AM, Young DA. Modern concepts and material for the pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18: 469-75. google scholar
• Ayaz F, Tağtekin D, Yanıkoğlu F. Dentine bağlanma ve değerlendirme metodları. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2011; 4: 49-56. google scholar
• Arisu HD, Eliguzeloglu E, Uctasli MB, Omurlu H, Turkoz E. Effect of multiple consecutive adhesive coatings on microleakage of class V cavities. European Journal of Dentistry 2000; 3: 178. google scholar
• Retief DH. Standardizing laboratory adhesion tests. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 231-6. google scholar
• Feılzer AJ, De G, Davıdson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 2-5. google scholar
• Crim GA, Shay JS. Microleakage pattern of a resin-veneered cavity liner. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 273-6. google scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27: 89-99. google scholar
• Karatoprak O, Kırzıoğlu Z. Comparison of the microleakage and cementing characteristics of three different cements used to cement stainless steel crowns. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 1997; 1: 21-7. google scholar
• Guelmann M, Bookmyer KL, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child 2004; 71: 209- 11. google scholar
• Raskin A, Tassery H, D‘hoore W, Gonthier S, Vreven J, Degrange M, Dejaou J. Influence of the number of sections on reliability of in-vitro microleakage evaluations. Am J Dent 2003; 6: 207-10. google scholar
• Amarante de Camargo DA Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L, de Sousa Neto MD, Consani S. Influence of the methodology and evaluation criteria on determining microleakage in dentin-restorative interfaces. Clin Oral Investig 2006; 10: 317-23. google scholar
• Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 173-85. google scholar
• Gupta A, Tavane P, Gupta PK, Tejolatha B, Lakhani AA, Tiwari R, et al. Evaluation of microleakage with total etch, self etch and universal adhesive systems in class V restorations: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2017; 11: 53-6. google scholar
• Ozturk AN, Ozturk B, Aykent F. Microleakage of different cementation techniques in Class V ceramic inlays. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2004; 31: 1192-6. google scholar
• Piva E, Meinhardt L, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Dyes for caries detection: influence on composite and compomer microleakage. Clinical Oral Investigations 2002; 6: 244-8. google scholar
• Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dental Materials 2005; 21: 895- 910. google scholar
• Mixson J, Eick J, Chappell R, Tira D, Moore D. Comparison of two-surface and multiple-surface scoring methodologies for in vitro microleakage studies. Dental Materials 1991; 7: 191-6. google scholar
• Nascimento AS, Durao MdA, Sousa YdC, Correia TC, Braz R. Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP 2016; 45: 327- 31. google scholar
• Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 32-41. google scholar
• Sadeghi M. Microleakage comparison of three types of adhesive systems versus GIC-based adhesive in class V composite restorations. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques 2016; 5: 86-93. google scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28. google scholar
• Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent 2011; 39: 506-12. google scholar
• Bacelar-Sa R, Giannini M, Ambrosano GMB, Bedran-Russo AK. Dentin Sealing and Bond Strength Evaluation of Hema-Free and Multi-Mode Adhesives to Biomodified Dentin. Braz Dent J 2017; 28: 731-7. google scholar
• Takahashi S., Zhou J., Wurihan, Shimomura N., Kataoka Y., Watanabe C., Shibata Y., Funatsu T., Gao P., Miyazaki T. High-resolution mechanical mapping of the adhesive-dentin interface: The effect of co-monomers in 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 117 (2021) 104389. google scholar
• Reis A, Loguercio AD. A 36-month clinical evaluation of ethanol/ water and acetone-based etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 384-91. google scholar
• Öz F.D., Ergin E., Canatan S. Çürüksüz servikal lezyonların restorasyonunda universal adezivlerin farklı uygulama şekillerinin restorasyonların performansı üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi: 12-aylık randomize kontrollü klinik bir çalışmanın ön raporu. Acta Odontol Turc 2019; 36: 7-15. google scholar
• Hajizadeh H, Nemati-Karimooy A, Nasseh A, Rahmanpour N. Evaluating the shear bond strength of enamel and dentin with or without etching: A comparative study between dimethacrylate-based and silorane-based adhesives. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: 563-8. google scholar
• Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 11-5. google scholar
• Lenzi TL, Pires CW, Soares FZM, Raggio DP, Ardenghi TM, de Oliveira Rocha R. Performance of Universal Adhesive in Primary Molars After Selective Removal of Carious Tissue: An 18-Month Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent 2017; 39: 371-6. google scholar
• Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 765-76. google scholar
• Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 141-6. google scholar
• Loguercio AD, Moura SK, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Patzlaff RT, Grande RH, Reis A. Durability of enamel bonding using two-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 79-88. google scholar
• Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ. Two-year water degradation of self-etching adhesives bonded to bur ground enamel. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 732-40. google scholar
• Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 145967. google scholar
• Perdigao J, Monteiro P, Gomes G. In vitro enamel sealing of self-etch adhesives. Quintessence Int 2009;40: 225-33. google scholar
• Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, et al. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 339-44. google scholar
• de Alexandre RS, Sundfeld RH, Giannini M, Lovadino JR. The influence of temperature of three adhesive systems on bonding to ground enamel. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 272-81. google scholar
• Souza-Junior EJ, Prieto LT, Araujo CT, Paulillo LA. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 195-204. google scholar
• Can Say E, Yurdaguven H, Ozel E, Soyman M. A randomized five-year clinical study of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 757-63. google scholar
• Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2014; 39: 113-27. google scholar
• Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 153-8. google scholar
• Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1187-94. google scholar
• Lührs AK, Guhr S, Schilke R, Borchers L, Geurtsen W, Günay H. Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching. Oper Dent 2008; 3: 155-62. google scholar
• Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Di Lenarda R, Petschelt A, Breschi L. Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 517-24. google scholar
• Souza-Junior EJ, Araujo CT, Prieto LT, Paulillo LA. Influence of the LED curing source and selective enamel etching on dentin bond strength of self-etch adhesives in class I composite restorations. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 1175-82. google scholar