Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE ROLE OF TEACHER AND CURRICULUM IN INTERVENTIONS IN DAILY LESSONS

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 2 , 63 - 67, 01.09.2015

Öz

The
demand of interventions in daily lessons is high in the classroom, and
curriculum programs make an effort to include resources for such interventions.
Yet, there is no clear theoretical and practical guidance on daily
interventions for both teacher and curriculum. This study examines
interventions that are offered in written lessons from a range of elementary
mathematics curriculum programs and those that teachers actually incorporate
into instruction, aiming at understanding the nature of interventions embedded
in daily lessons and the role of teacher and curriculum in classroom
interventions. The results of the study highlight the importance of
intervention resources in the curriculum and teacher role in recognizing the
affordances of resources to provide appropriate interventions toward the
mathematical point of the lesson.

Kaynakça

  • Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Church, R. B., Wolfgram, M. S., Kim, S., & Knuth, E. J. (2013). Teachers’ gestures and speech in mathematics lessons: Forging common ground by resolving trouble spots. ZDM, 45, 425-440. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39-88. Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher–tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd, (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17-36). New York: Routledge. Choppin, J. (2011). The role of local theories: Teacher knowledge and its impact on engaging students with challenging tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23, 5-25. Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39-65. Kheong, F. H., Sharpe, P., Soon, G. K., Ramakrishnan, C., Wah, B. L. P., & Choo, M. (2010). Math in focus: The Singapore Approach by Marshall Cavendish, Teacher’s Edition, Book B Grade 4. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Stylianides, A., & Stylianides, G. (2013). Seeking research-grounded solutions to problems of practice: Classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM, 45, 333-341. TERC. (2008). Investigations in Number, Data, and Space Teacher’s Guide Grade 3, Unit 5 Equal Groups. Glenview, IL: Pearson. Thomas, J. N., & Harkness, S. S. (2013). Implications for intervention: Categorising the quantitative mental imagery of children. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 231-256.
Yıl 2015, Cilt: 2 , 63 - 67, 01.09.2015

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Church, R. B., Wolfgram, M. S., Kim, S., & Knuth, E. J. (2013). Teachers’ gestures and speech in mathematics lessons: Forging common ground by resolving trouble spots. ZDM, 45, 425-440. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39-88. Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher–tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd, (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17-36). New York: Routledge. Choppin, J. (2011). The role of local theories: Teacher knowledge and its impact on engaging students with challenging tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23, 5-25. Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39-65. Kheong, F. H., Sharpe, P., Soon, G. K., Ramakrishnan, C., Wah, B. L. P., & Choo, M. (2010). Math in focus: The Singapore Approach by Marshall Cavendish, Teacher’s Edition, Book B Grade 4. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Stylianides, A., & Stylianides, G. (2013). Seeking research-grounded solutions to problems of practice: Classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM, 45, 333-341. TERC. (2008). Investigations in Number, Data, and Space Teacher’s Guide Grade 3, Unit 5 Equal Groups. Glenview, IL: Pearson. Thomas, J. N., & Harkness, S. S. (2013). Implications for intervention: Categorising the quantitative mental imagery of children. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 231-256.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Ok-kyeong Kım Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Kım, O.-k. (2015). THE ROLE OF TEACHER AND CURRICULUM IN INTERVENTIONS IN DAILY LESSONS. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 2, 63-67.