The Role of ePortfolios in Formative Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

In educational settings, formative assessment is used to determine the status of students and foster their development. Task, process, and feedback serve as the basis of formative assessments. Typically, tasks are introduced to lessons to facilitate student feedback. Due to their technological potential, eportfolios are often used to help with assigning tasks, managing processes, and getting feedback. It is necessary to incorporate the findings from environments where eportfolios are used for formative assessment into the existing literature. A systematic literature review was employed for this purpose. Three researchers reviewed 33 studies utilizing content analysis. The Fleiss kappa was used to determine inter-rater reliability. Quantitative analysis was performed on the articles' dependent or related variables, environments, research method, implementation period, evaluators, eportfolio type, activity format, evaluation instruments, education level, and course categories. Among the qualitative findings of the studies were the prominent concepts of the use of eportfolios, as well as the themes and codes of advantages and challenges. The findings indicate that the integration of eportfolios in the formative assessment process, despite its challenges, provides significant advantages. It is expected that the study's findings will be useful for researchers as well as practitioners who intend to use eportfolios for formative assessment processes.

Keywords

• Eportfolio
• formative assessment
• feedback
• task
• systematic literature review

References

1. Andrade, H. L. (2010). Summing up and moving forward: key challenges and future directions for research and development in formative assessment. In Andrade, H. L. & Cizek, G. J. (Eds), Handbook of formative assessment (344- 351). Routlage.
2. Andrade, R., van Riper, C. J., Goodson, D. J., Johnson, D. N., Stewart, W., López-Rodríguez, M. D., ... & Raymond, C. M. (2023). Values shift in response to social learning through deliberation about protected areas. Global Environmental Change, 78, 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102630
3. Asamoah, D., Shahrill, M., & Abdul Latif, S. (2022). A review of formative assessment techniques in higher education during COVID-19. The Qualitative Report, 27(2), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.46743/ 2160-3715/2022.5145
4. Balaban, I., & Bubas, G. (2010, June). Educational potentials of ePortfolio systems: Student evaluations of
5. Mahara and Elgg. In Proceedings of the ITI 2010, 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (pp. 329-336). IEEE.
6. * Barbera, E. (2009). Mutual feedback in e‐portfolio assessment: an approach to the netfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00803.x
7. Barker, K. C. (2006). Environmental scan: Overview of the ePortfolio in general and in the workplace specifically. Retrieved from https://www.futured.com/documents/LIfIABackgroundePforSkilledImmigrants.pdf
8. Barrett, H. (2003). Symposium on Electronic Portfolios. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 19-21). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/17817/.

9. Barrett, H. (2006). Using electronic portfolios for formative/classroom-based assessment. Classroom Connect Connected Newsletter, 13(2), 4-6. https://electronicportfolios.org/portfolios/ConnectedNewsletter.pdf
10. Barrett, H. (2010). Balancing the two faces of ePortfolios. Educ. Form. & Tecnol 3(1), 6-14. Retrieved from https://eft-edu.com/index.php/eft/article/view/70/54
11. * Baturay, M. H., & Daloğlu, A. (2010). E-portfolio assessment in an online English language course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(5), 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.520671
12. * Beckers, J., Dolmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2022). Student, direct thyself! Facilitating self-directed learning skills and motivation with an electronic development portfolio. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(4), 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1906363
13. Bennett, D., Knight, E., & Rowley, J. (2020). The role of hybrid learning spaces in enhancing higher education students’ employability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1188-1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12931
14. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 18, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.
15. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/
16. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi delta kappan, 92(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
17. Blaschke, L. M., & Marin, V. (2020). Applications of heutagogy in the educational use of e-portfolios. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 20(64). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.407831
18. Box, C. (2019). The Power of Formative Assessment. In: Formative Assessment in United States Classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03092-6_2
19. * Bramley, A., Forsyth, A., & McKenna, L. (2021). Design, implementation and evaluation of novel work-based clinical assessment tool: an e-portfolio with embedded entrustable professional activities. Nurse Education Today, 107, 105101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105101
20. Bryant, J., & Bates, A. J. (2015). Creating a constructivist online instructional environment. TechTrends, 59(2), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0834-1
21. Burner, T. (2014). The potential formative benefits of portfolio assessment in second and foreign language writing contexts: A review of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.03.002
22. Chang, C. C., Chou, P. N., & Liang, C. (2018). Using ePortfolio-based learning approach to facilitate knowledge sharing and creation of college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2687
23. * Chang, C. C., Liang, C., Tseng, K. H., & Tseng, J. S. (2014). Using e-portfolios to elevate knowledge amassment among university students. Computers & Education, 72, 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.015
24. * Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., Liang, C., & Chen, T. Y. (2013). Using e-portfolios to facilitate university students' knowledge management performance: E-portfolio vs. non-portfolio. Computers & Education, 69, 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.017
25. Chang, S. L., & Kabilan, M. K. (2022). Using social media as e-Portfolios to support learning in higher education: a literature analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09344-z
26. Chappuis, S., & Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 40-43. Retrieved from https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/classroom-assessment-for-learning
27. * Chau, J., & Cheng, G. (2010). Towards understanding the potential of e-portfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7). 932-950. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1026
28. Chetcuti, D., Buhagiar, M. A., & Cardona, A. (2011). The professional development portfolio: Learning through reflection in the first year of teaching. Reflective practice, 12(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.541095
29. * Chuang, H. H. (2010). Weblog-based electronic portfolios for student teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9098-1
30. Cohen, L. M., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
31. * Contreras-Higuera, W. E., Martínez-Olmo, F., José Rubio-Hurtado, M., & Vilà-Baños, R. (2016). University students’ perceptions of e-portfolios and rubrics as combined assessment tools in education courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(1), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115612784
32. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
33. De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self-and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments?. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412441284
34. * Demir, B. P., & Kutlu, Ö. (2016). The Effect of Electronic Portfolio Applications on 6th Graders' Research Skills. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 41(188). http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6724
35. * De Swardt, M., Jenkins, L. S., Von Pressentin, K. B., & Mash, R. (2019). Implementing and evaluating an e- portfolio for postgraduate family medicine training in the Western Cape, South Africa. BMC Medical Education, 19, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1692-x
36. Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203462041
37. * Ebil, S., Salleh, S. M., & Shahrill, M. (2020). The use of E-portfolio for self-reflection to promote learning: A case of TVET students. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5797-5814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10248-7
38. * Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Electronic writing portfolio in a collaborative writing environment: its impact on EFL students’ writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2097697
39. Fuller, J. S., & Dawson, K. M. (2017). Student response systems for formative assessment: Literature-based strategies and findings from a middle school implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(4), 370-389. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6206
40. Gamlem, S., M. & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
41. Gardner, K. M., & Aleksejuniene, J. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of student feedback on ePortfolio learning. Journal of Dental Education, 72(11), 1324-1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2008.72.11.tb04615.x
42. * Garrett, N. (2011). An e-portfolio design supporting ownership, social learning, and ease of use. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 187-202. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/75362/.
43. Gezer, T., Wang, C., Polly, A., Martin, C., Pugalee, D., & Lambert, R. (2021). The relationship between formative assessment and summative assessment in Primary grade mathematics classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5), 673-685. Retrieved from https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1508
44. Gibson, D. (2006). ePortfolio Decisions and Dilemas. Jafari, A. & Kaufman, C(Eds). In Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 135-145). IGI Global.
45. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). The place of values in needs assessment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164061
46. Gulbahar, Y. (2009). Usage of Electronic Portfolios for Assessment. In Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level: Issues and Challenges (pp. 702-719). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/chapter/35946
47. Hallam, G., & Creagh, T. (2010). ePortfolio use by university students in Australia: A review of the Australian ePortfolio Project. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903510582
48. Heath, M. (2005). Are You Ready to Go Digital?: The Pros and Cons of Electronic Portfolio Development. Library Media Connection, 23(7), 66-70. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ717645
49. Hegarty, B., & Thompson, M. (2019). A teacher’s influence on student engagement: Using smartphones for creating vocational assessment ePortfolios. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 18, 113. https://doi.org/10.28945/4244
50. Heinrich, E., Bhattacharya, M. & Rayudu, R. (2007). Preparation for lifelong learning using ePortfolios. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701520602
51. Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational research review, 17, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
52. Himpsl, K., & Baumgartner, P. (2009). Evaluation of e-portfolio software. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 4(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v4i1.831
53. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children's education: Why does it make a difference?. Teachers college record, 97(2), 310-331. Retrieved from http://futured.com/documents/LIfIABackgroundePforSkilledImmigrants.pdf
54. * Huang, H. T. D., & Hung, S. T. A. (2010). Implementing electronic speaking portfolios: Perceptions of EFL students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), E84-E88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00996.x
55. * Hung, S. T. A. (2012). A washback study on e-portfolio assessment in an English as a Foreign Language teacher preparation program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.551756
56. Irving, K. (2015). Technology-assisted formative assessment. In M. J. Urban and D. A. Falvo (Eds.), Improving K-12 STEM education outcomes through technological integration (pp. 380-398). IGI Global.
57. * Jan van Aalst & K. K. Chan (2007) Student-Directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175-220, https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701193697
58. * Kabilan, M. K. (2016). Using Facebook as an e-portfolio in enhancing pre-service teachers’ professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2052
59. * Kabilan, M. K., & Khan, M. A. (2012). Assessing pre-service English language teachers’ learning using e-portfolios: Benefits, challenges and competencies gained. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1007-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.011
60. Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., & Öztürk, H. T. (2020). Examining University Students’ Acceptance of Web-based Formative Assessment System. Journal of Hacettepe University Education Faculty. 35(Special Issue), 25-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020063671
61. Kerr, W. (2007). Service user and staff perspectives on recovery in psychosis: Talking the same language and research portfolio. University of Glasgow (United Kingdom). Retrived from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2023796799?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
62. * Khodi, A., Khezerlou, H., & Sahraei, H. (2022). Dependability and utility of using e-portfolios in assessing EFL learners’ speaking proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2093379
63. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
64. Klenowski, V. (2009). Australian Indigenous students: Addressing equity issues in assessment. Teaching Education, 20(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210802681741
65. Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C. D., & Karakaya, İ. (2017). Öğrenci Başarısının Belirlenmesi- Performansa ve Portfolyoya Dayalı Durum Belirleme. Pegem Publishing.
66. Lam, R. (2022). Assessing creative writing formatively and summatively with e-Portfolios: A case study in Hong Kong. Chamcharatsri, B. & Iida, A. (Eds). In International Perspectives on Creative Writing in Second Language Education (pp. 171-188). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003183914-12
67. Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
68. Leighton, J. P. (2019). Students’ interpretation of formative assessment feedback: Three claims for why we know so little about something so important. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56(4), 793-814. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12237
69. * López-Crespo, G., Blanco-Gandía, M. C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Fidalgo, C., & Sánchez-Pérez, N. (2021). The educational e-portfolio: preliminary evidence of its relationship with student’s self-efficacy and engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10827-2
70. Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022, February). The next black box of formative assessment: A model of the internal mechanisms of feedback processing. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 20). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751548
71. Mashauri, M. M. (2023). Formative Assessment in EFL Classrooms in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Analysis of Teachers’ Judgements at Oicha Senior School. Open Access Library Journal, 10(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110210
72. Mason, R., Pegler, C., & Weller, M. (2004). E‐portfolios: an assessment tool for online courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 717-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00429.x
73. * McLeod, J. K., & Vasinda, S. (2009). Electronic portfolios: Perspectives of students, teachers and parents. Education and Information Technologies, 14, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9077-5
74. * Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education, 55(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005
75. Meyer, E. J., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., & Scherzer, R. (2011). Electronic portfolios in the classroom: Factors impacting teachers’ integration of new technologies and new pedagogies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.588415
76. Mgarbi, H., Chkouri, M., & Tahiri, A. (2022). Purpose and Design of a Digital Environment for the Professional Insertion of Students Based on the E-portfolio Approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i01.26703
77. Mitchell, L., Campbell, C., Somerville, M., Cardell, E., & Williams, L. T. (2021). Enhancing graduate employability through targeting ePortfolios to employer expectations: A systematic scoping review. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 12(2), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no2art1003
78. Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
79. * Nicolaidou, I. (2013). E-portfolios supporting primary students' writing performance and peer feedback. Computers & Education, 68, 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.004
80. Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational assessment of students. Pearson.
81. Oh, J. E., Chan, Y. K., & Kim, K. V. (2020). Social media and e-portfolios: impacting design students' motivation through project-based learning. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(3), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.3.03
82. Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases. Computers & Education, 54(3), 715-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.032
83. Peacock, S., Scott, A., Murray, S., & Morss, K. (2012). Using feedback and ePortfolios to support professional competence in healthcare learners. Research in Higher Education Journal, 16. http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/111070.pdf
84. Pierre, E., & Oughton, J. (2007). The Affective Domain: Undiscovered Country. College Quarterly, 10(4), 1-7.
85. Ramsey, B. & Duffy, A. (2016). Formative assessment in the classroom: Findings from three districts. Michael and Susan Dell Foundation and Education, 1. Retrieved from https://education- first.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/05/MSDF-Formative-Assessment-Study-Final-Report.pdf
86. * Ruiz, J. G., Qadri, S. S., Karides, M., Castillo, C., Milanez, M., & Roos, B. A. (2009). Fellows' perceptions of a mandatory reflective electronic portfolio in a geriatric medicine fellowship program. Educational Gerontology, 35(7), 634-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270902877360
87. * Sánchez Gómez, S., Ostos, E. M. C., Solano, J. M. M., & Salado, T. F. H. (2013). An electronic portfolio for quantitative assessment of surgical skills in undergraduate medical education. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-65
88. Schildkamp, K., Van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
89. Segaran, M. K., & Hasim, Z. (2021). Self-regulated Learning through ePortfolio: A Meta-analysis. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 131-156. Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 131-156. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.1.6
90. * Sharifi, M., Soleimani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2017). E‐portfolio evaluation and vocabulary learning: Moving from pedagogy to andragogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1441-1450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12479
91. * Shepherd, C. E., & Bolliger, D. U. (2011). The effects of electronic portfolio tools on online students' perceived support and cognitive load. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.002
92. Slepcevic-Zach, P., & Stock, M. (2018). ePortfolio as a tool for reflection and self-reflection. Reflective Practice, 19(3), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1437399
93. Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development and reflective learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961292
94. Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
95. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930502
96. * Struyven, K., Blieck, Y., & De Roeck, V. (2014). The electronic portfolio as a tool to develop and assess pre-service student teaching competences: Challenges for quality. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.06.001
97. Sweet, D. (1993). Student portfolios: Classroom uses. Office of Education Research: Consumer Guide, 8, 1-5.
98. Tillema, H. H. (2001). Portfolios as developmental assessment tools. International Journal of Training and Development, 5(2), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2419.00127
99. Törmälä, V. (2021). ePortfolios in craft education at the primary level: Teachers' experiences on ICT integration. Design and Technology Education, 26(2), 28-45. Retrieved from https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2918
100. Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, assessment for learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 324-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024
101. Vankúš, P. (2021). Influence of game-based learning in mathematics education on students’ affective domain: A systematic review. Mathematics, 9(9), 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9090986
102. Vogel, M. (2018). Combining and integrating formative and summative assessment in mathematics teacher education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 50(3), 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0948-y
103. Wade, A., Abrami, P., & Sclater, J. (2005). An electronic portfolio to support learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2H30P
104. * Wang, L. (2010). Integrating communities of practice in e-portfolio assessment: Effects and experiences of mutual assessment in an online course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.002
105. * Wang, P., & Jeffrey, R. (2017). Listening to learners: An investigation into college students’ attitudes towards the adoption of e‐portfolios in English assessment and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1451-1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12513
106. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?. Studies in educational evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
107. Wiliam, D., & Black, P. (1996). Meanings and consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192960220502
108. Yancey, K. B. (2023). ePortfolio as curriculum: Models and practices for developing students’ ePortfolio literacy. Taylor & Francis.
109. * Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2016). The role of e‐portfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1276-1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12316
110. Zhang, X., Olfman, L., Ractham, P., & Firpo, D. (2009, May). The implementation and evaluation of KEEP SLS: An ePortfolio system supporting social constructive learning. In Proceedings of the special interest group on management information system's 47th annual conference on Computer personnel research (pp. 13-18).
111. * Zheng, Y., & Barrot, J. S. (2022). Social media as an e-portfolio platform: Effects on L2 learners’ speaking performance. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1). https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73487