Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ROLE OF PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES IN IMPROVING COLLEGE STUDENTS SKILLS IN STOICHIOMETRY AND BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE UNITS OF MEASUREMENTS

Yıl 2017, Sayı: 1, 201 - 207, 09.11.2017

Öz

This paper presents results on improvement of college
students’ knowledge of “units of measurements” understanding and their
inter-conversions, and improving their skills in manipulating and understanding
chemical calculations through practical experiments on corrosion of four
different steel alloys. The experiments constitute a practical part (1
hour/week) of a course on materials and corrosion for second year diploma
program in chemical processing. The course includes 3 hours theory as the major
part.

The course introduced learners to the physical and
mechanical properties of materials commonly used in the chemical processing
industries. One part of the course examines the factors that promote the
corrosion of these materials when used in industrial processes. Learners also
examine a variety of means of controlling and monitoring of corrosion and
corrosion processes in chemical industries.

 

During the academic term winter 2017, 20 students were
enrolled in this course. Due to the limited time allotted to practical session,
the practical part of the course was focusing on a long single experiment of
monitoring corrosion rate of four bars of different steel alloys having the
same surface area, placed in a solution of 3.5 % sodium chloride solution, over
8 weeks, by measuring weekly weight loss of each specimen. Students’
development of knowledge was monitored by three different theoretical tests,
over the period, that involve similar calculations (but not identical) on rust
and rate of corrosion. The first two tests were undertaken independent of the
final results of the practical part with similar questions (but not identical)
were given. The third test was undertaken after the students have submitted
reports of their results and calculation.

 In the first
test, two students only were able to score over 80% of the mark in the
calculation part of the test which consists of two problems; four were able to
solve one problem only scoring about 50%. Fourteen students were unable to
solve any of the two problems. In the second test, four students scored over
80% of the mark in the calculation part and 7 students scored around 50%. The
rest failed to solve any problem. In the third test 19 students scored over 80%
and 1 student scored 50%.   

 













On the units of measurement that required 3
conversions, 2 students were able to manipulate all the conversion calculation
correctly, 5 with two correct conversions, 13 with no correct conversion.  In the second test 8 students were able to
manipulate all conversions correctly (although some included few calculation
error), 4 with two correct conversions and 8 with no correct conversions. In
the third test 18 students were able to manipulate all conversions correctly, 2
students with two correct conversions.  

Kaynakça

  • Abrahams, I. and Millar, R. (2008) “Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science” International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969, Dillon, J.(2008) “Review of the Research on Practical Work in School Science”. A review prepared for Science Community Representing Education (SCORE), 2008. Retrieved from http://www.score-education.org/media/3671/review_of_research.pdf Galloway, K.R. and Bretz, S.L, (2015) “Measuring Meaningful Learning in the Undergraduate General Chemistry and Organic Chemistry Laboratories: A Longitudinal Study”. J. Chem. Educ., 92 (12), pp 2019–2030. Harter, S. (2009) “Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model”. Human Development, 21(1), pp.34-64. Millar, R. and Abraham, I. (2009) “Practical Work: making it more effective”. Science School Research 91(334) pp.59-64. Millar, R. (2004) “The Role of Practical work in the teaching and learning of science”. Paper presented for the meeting on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision” National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC 3-4 June 2004. Novak, J.D. (2011). A Theory of Education: Meaningful Learning Underlies the Constructive Integration of Thinking, Feeling, and Acting Leading to Empowerment and Responsibility. Meaningful Learning Review-V1, pp.1-14 Said, Z. & Friesen, H. (2013). The Impact of Educational Reform on Science and Mathematics Education in Qatar. European Scientific Journal, 9(19), 3345-3355. Said, Z. Friesen, H., & Al-Ezzah, H. (2014) “The Importance of Practical Activities in School Science: Perspectives of Independent School Teachers in Qatari Schools”. The 5th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies EDULEARN14, Barcelona, Spain. Proceedings, 4847-4856 ISBN: 978-84-617-0557-3. Said, Ziad (2016) Developing a Framework for Effective Delivery of Practicals in Science Teaching in the State of Qatar. International Jornal of Educacional Science and Research, 6 (2) pp. 25-33. Shumow, L. and Schmidt, J. (2014) “Enhancing Adolescents’ Motivation for Science” CROWIN, ASAGE Company, California.
Yıl 2017, Sayı: 1, 201 - 207, 09.11.2017

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abrahams, I. and Millar, R. (2008) “Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science” International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969, Dillon, J.(2008) “Review of the Research on Practical Work in School Science”. A review prepared for Science Community Representing Education (SCORE), 2008. Retrieved from http://www.score-education.org/media/3671/review_of_research.pdf Galloway, K.R. and Bretz, S.L, (2015) “Measuring Meaningful Learning in the Undergraduate General Chemistry and Organic Chemistry Laboratories: A Longitudinal Study”. J. Chem. Educ., 92 (12), pp 2019–2030. Harter, S. (2009) “Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model”. Human Development, 21(1), pp.34-64. Millar, R. and Abraham, I. (2009) “Practical Work: making it more effective”. Science School Research 91(334) pp.59-64. Millar, R. (2004) “The Role of Practical work in the teaching and learning of science”. Paper presented for the meeting on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision” National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC 3-4 June 2004. Novak, J.D. (2011). A Theory of Education: Meaningful Learning Underlies the Constructive Integration of Thinking, Feeling, and Acting Leading to Empowerment and Responsibility. Meaningful Learning Review-V1, pp.1-14 Said, Z. & Friesen, H. (2013). The Impact of Educational Reform on Science and Mathematics Education in Qatar. European Scientific Journal, 9(19), 3345-3355. Said, Z. Friesen, H., & Al-Ezzah, H. (2014) “The Importance of Practical Activities in School Science: Perspectives of Independent School Teachers in Qatari Schools”. The 5th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies EDULEARN14, Barcelona, Spain. Proceedings, 4847-4856 ISBN: 978-84-617-0557-3. Said, Ziad (2016) Developing a Framework for Effective Delivery of Practicals in Science Teaching in the State of Qatar. International Jornal of Educacional Science and Research, 6 (2) pp. 25-33. Shumow, L. and Schmidt, J. (2014) “Enhancing Adolescents’ Motivation for Science” CROWIN, ASAGE Company, California.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ziad Said

Helena Adam

Yayımlanma Tarihi 9 Kasım 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Said, Z., & Adam, H. (2017). ROLE OF PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES IN IMPROVING COLLEGE STUDENTS SKILLS IN STOICHIOMETRY AND BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE UNITS OF MEASUREMENTS. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics(1), 201-207.