<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                    <journal-id></journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1012-2354</issn>
                                                                                                        <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Erciyes Üniversitesi</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.65520/erciyesfen.1791972</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Numerical Modelization in Civil Engineering</subject>
                                                            <subject>Transportation Engineering</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>İnşaat Mühendisliğinde Sayısal Modelleme</subject>
                                                            <subject>Ulaştırma Mühendisliği</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <trans-title-group xml:lang="tr">
                                    <trans-title>Dönemeç İçine İnşa Edilen Çelik Otokorkulukların Konkav ve Konveks Durumlarının En 1317 Standardındaki Güvenlik Parametrelerine Etkisinin Sonlu Elemanlar Analizi ile Araştırılması</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <article-title>Investigation of the Effects of Concave and Convex Conditions of Steel Guardrails Installed Inside Curves on the Safety Parameters According to the EN 1317 Standard Using Finite Element Analysis</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8504-7611</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Ozcanan</surname>
                                    <given-names>Sedat</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>SIRNAK UNIVERSITY</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-2477</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Özcan</surname>
                                    <given-names>Özgür</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ŞIRNAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6858-1521</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Acar</surname>
                                    <given-names>Zeynel</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ŞIRNAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20260326">
                    <day>03</day>
                    <month>26</month>
                    <year>2026</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>42</volume>
                                        <issue>1</issue>
                                                
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20250926">
                        <day>09</day>
                        <month>26</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20260209">
                        <day>02</day>
                        <month>09</month>
                        <year>2026</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 1985, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>1985</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="tr">
                            <p>Çelik otokorkuluk sistemleri, özellikle kaza oranlarının yüksek olduğu yatay kurplarda meydana gelen yoldan çıkma kazalarında yaralanma şiddetinin azaltılmasında kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Ancak EN 1317 standardında tanımlanan doğrulama prosedürleri ağırlıklı olarak düz yol kesitlerinde gerçekleştirilen çarpışma testlerine dayanmaktadır ve eğrisel yol geometrilerinin etkisi yeterince dikkate alınmamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, konkav ve konveks yatay kurpların çelik otokorkuluk sistemlerinin güvenlik performansı üzerindeki etkileri sonlu elemanlar analizi (SEA) kullanılarak sayısal olarak incelenmiştir. EN 1317 ile uyumlu H1W4-A çelik otokorkuluk sistemi, TB11 çarpışma testi koşulları altında LS-DYNA yazılımı kullanılarak modellenmiş ve doğrulanmıştır. Doğrulanan model, 30 m ile 210 m arasında değişen yarıçaplara sahip konkav ve konveks kurp konfigürasyonlarına uyarlanmış ve toplam 14 adet sayısal çarpışma simülasyonu gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, Hızlanma Şiddet İndeksi (ASI) ve Teorik Baş Çarpma Hızı (THIV) gibi yolcu güvenliğine ilişkin parametreler ile çalışma genişliği (W) ve çıkış açısı (α) gibi yapısal performans ölçütleri sistematik olarak değerlendirilmiş ve düz yol referans koşulları ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, konkav otokorkuluk sistemlerinin düz yol koşullarına kıyasla daha düşük ASI ve THIV değerleri sergileyerek daha az darbe şiddeti oluşturduğunu göstermektedir. Buna karşılık, konveks otokorkuluk sistemlerinin özellikle küçük yarıçaplı kurplarda daha yüksek ve kritik güvenlik seviyelerine yol açtığı belirlenmiştir. Çoğu konfigürasyon EN 1317 sınır değerleri içinde kalmasına rağmen, R30 konkav durumunda izin verilen çıkış açısı ve çalışma genişliği limitlerinin aşıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu bulgular, otokorkuluk güvenlik değerlendirmelerinde yol geometrisinin etkisinin mutlaka dikkate alınması gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>Steel guardrail systems play a critical role in reducing injury severity during run-off-road crashes, especially on horizontal curves where accident rates are high. However, validation procedures defined in the EN 1317 standard are predominantly based on crash tests performed on straight road sections, and the influence of curved geometries is not sufficiently considered. This study numerically examines the effects of concave and convex horizontal curves on the safety performance of steel guardrails using finite element analysis (FEA). An EN 1317-compliant H1W4-A steel guardrail system was developed and validated under TB11 crash test conditions using LS-DYNA. The validated model was subsequently applied to concave and convex curve configurations with radii between 30 m and 210 m, resulting in a total of 14 numerical crash simulations. Key occupant safety parameters, namely the Acceleration Severity Index (ASI) and Theoretical Head Impact Velocity (THIV), together with structural performance measures such as working width (W) and exit angle (α), were systematically evaluated and compared with straight-road reference conditions. The results indicate that concave guardrails generally exhibit reduced impact severity, reflected by lower ASI and THIV values, compared to straight-road cases. In contrast, convex guardrails lead to higher and more critical safety indices, particularly at smaller radii. Although most configurations remain within EN 1317 limits, the R30 concave case exceeds allowable exit angle and working width thresholds. These findings highlight the necessity of incorporating road curvature effects into guardrail safety assessments.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Horizontal curve</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Guardrail</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  EN 1317</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Crash test</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Finite element analysis</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="tr">
                                                    <kwd>Yatay Kurp</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Otokorkuluk</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  EN1317</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Çarpışma testi</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Sonlu elemanlar analizi</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ma, Q., Yang, H., Wang, Z., Xie, K., Yang, D. 2020. Modeling crash risk of horizontal curves using large-scale auto-extracted roadway geometry data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 144(2020), 105669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105669</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">NHTSA. 2020. Fatality Analysis Reporting System. http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx (Access date: 09.04.2023).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">FHWA. 2019. Horizontal Curve Safety. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/countermeasures/horicurves/ (Access date: 14.03.2022).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">European Transport Safety Council (ETSC). 2017. Reducing Deaths in Single Vehicle Collisions. PIN Flash Report No. 32. https://etsc.eu/wp-content/uploads/PIN_FLASH32-FINAL.pdf (Access date: 17.07.2024).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Peng, J., Chu, L., Wang, T., Fwa, T. F. 2021. Analysis of vehicle skidding potential on horizontal curves. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 152(2021), 105960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105960</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wood, J., Donnell, E. T. 2020. Empirical Bayes before-after evaluation of horizontal curve warning pavement markings on two-lane rural highways in Pennsylvania. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 146(2020), 105734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105734</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Atahan, A. O., Bonin, G., Karacasu, M. 2007. Development of a 30,000 kg heavy goods vehicle for LS-DYNA applications. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, 14(1)(2007), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHVS.2007.011929</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">EN 1317-1:2010, Road restraint systems - Part 1: Terminology and general criteria for test methods. 2010.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">EN1317-2:2010, Road restraint systems - Part 2: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for safety barriers including vehicle parapets Dispositifs. 2010.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sicking, D. L. 1995. Applications of simulation in design and analysis of roadside safety features. Transportation Research Circular, 435(1995).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ray, M. H. 1996. Repeatability of full-scale crash tests and criteria for validating simulation results. Transportation Research Record, 1528(1996), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196152800117</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Atahan, A. O. 2002. Finite element simulation of a strong-post W-beam guardrail system. Simulation, 78(10)(2002), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549702078010001</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ren, Z., Vesenjak, M. 2005. Computational and experimental crash analysis of the road safety barrier. Engineering Failure Analysis, 12(6)(2005), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.033</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pawlak, M. 2016. The acceleration severity index in the impact of a vehicle against permanent road equipment support structures. Mechanics Research Communications, 77(2016), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.08.005</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Long, K., Gao, Z., Yuan, Q., Xiang, W., Hao, W. 2018. Safety evaluation for roadside crashes by vehicle–object collision simulation. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(10)(2018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018805581</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yılmaz, İ., Yelek, İ., Özcanan, S., Atahan, A. O., Hiekmann, J. M. 2021. Artificial neural network metamodeling-based design optimization of a continuous motorcyclists protection barrier system. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03080-1</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ozcanan, S., Atahan, A. O. 2020. Radial basis function surrogate model-based optimization of guardrail post embedment depth in different soil conditions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 234(2–3)(2020), 739–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407019848548</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yumrutas, H. I., Ozcanan, S., Apak, M. Y. 2022. Experimental and numerical comparative crashworthiness analysis of innovative renewable hybrid barrier with conventional roadside barriers. International Journal of Crashworthiness, (2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2022.2075124</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Klasztorny, M. 2015. Rubber/foam/composite overlay onto guide B of barrier located on road bend. Archiwum Motoryzacji, 69(2015), 65–86.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Apak, M. Y., et al. 2022. Finite element simulation and failure analysis of fixed bollard system according to the PAS 68:2013 standard. Engineering Failure Analysis, 135(2022), 106151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106151</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chell, J., Brandani, C. E., Frascetti, S., Chakraverty, J., Camomilla, V. 2019. Limitations of the European barrier crash testing regulation relating to occupant safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 133(2019), 105239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.015</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Li, N., Fang, H., Zhang, C., Gutowski, M., Palta, E., Wang, Q. 2015. A numerical study of occupant responses and injuries in vehicular crashes into roadside barriers based on finite element simulations. Advances in Engineering Software, 90(2015), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.06.004</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">D. Naish, D. A., Burbridge, A. 2015. Occupant severity prediction from simulation of small car impact with various concrete barrier profiles. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 20(5)(2015), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2015.1048177</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ozcanan, S., Ozcan, O. 2022. Criteria inadequacy of the vehicles used for the calculation of safety parameters in the EN1317-TB11 test. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070221115010</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pachocki, L., Bruski, D., Burzyński, S., Chróścielewski, J., Wilde, K., Witkowski, W. 2018. On the influence of the acceleration recording time on the calculation of impact severity indexes. MATEC Web of Conferences, 219(2018), 03010. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821903010</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wilde, K., Burzyński, S., Bruski, D., Chróścielewski, J., Witkowski, W. 2017. TB11 test for short W-beam road barrier. 11th European LS-DYNA Conference, 2017, Salzburg.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">FHWA. 2016. Low-Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50421 (Access date: 01.01.2018).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wilde, K., Bruski, D., Budzyński, M., Burzyński, S., Chróścielewski, J., Jamroz, K., Pachocki, Ł., Witkowski, W. 2020. Numerical analysis of TB32 crash tests for 4-cable guardrail barrier system installed on horizontal convex curves of road. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 21(1)(2020), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2018-0169</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Budzyński, M., Bruski, D. 2018. Assessing vehicle restraint systems on horizontal curves. MATEC Web of Conferences, 231(2018), 01004. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823101004</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Klasztorny, M., Zielonka, K., Nycz, D. B., Posuniak, P., Romanowski, R. K. 2018. Experimental validation of simulated TB32 crash tests for SP-05/2 barrier on horizontal concave arc without and with composite overlay. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 18(2)(2018), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.07.007</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Klasztorny, M., Nycz, D. B., Zajac, K. P. 2019. Modelling and simulation of crash tests on curved barriers taking into account vehicle speed limits. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 14(3)(2019), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2019-14.445</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nycz, D. B. 2017. Influence of selected design parameters of the composite-foam cover rail on the course of the TB11 crash test of a road safety barrier forming a horizontal concave arc. Archiwum Motoryzacji, 76(2)(2017), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.14669/am.vol76.art5</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nasution, R. P., Siregar, R. A., Fuad, K., Adom, A. H. 2009. The effect of ASI (Acceleration Severity Index) to different crash velocities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications and Design in Mechanical Engineering, (2009), 11–13.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shojaati, M. 2003. Correlation between injury risk and impact severity index ASI. 3rd Swiss Transport Research Conference, 2003, Switzerland, 19–21.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ozcanan, S., Özcan, Ö. 2025. Impact angle-based section design and optimization of the C post in order to improve the safety and structural performance of guardrails. Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 36(3)(2025), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1519835</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">BS EN 16303:2020. Road restraint systems — Validation and verification process for the use of virtual testing in crash testing against vehicle restraint system. BSI Standards Publication, 2020.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">LSTC, 2019. A general-purpose dynamic finite element analysis program LS-DYNA version 971 user’s manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, California, USA, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ozcanan, S., Atahan, A. O. 2019. RBF surrogate model and EN1317 collision safety-based optimization of two guardrails. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 60(1)(2019), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02203-z</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ozcanan, S., Atahan, A. O. 2021. Minimization of accident severity index in concrete barrier designs using an ensemble of radial basis function metamodel-based optimization. Optimization and Engineering, 22(1)(2021), 485–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-020-09522-x</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">NCAC. 2008. Finite Element Model Archive. George Washington University FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center. http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html (Access date: 12.11.2008).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">CSI, (2017). Crash testing of H1 and H2 guardrails systems. 0021\ME\HRB\17, Bollate, Italy.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
