Maxillary Canine Impaction Occurrence and Severity in Relation with Dimensions and Morphology of Sella Turcica: A Retrospective Observational CBCT Study

Abstract

Objective: To investigate dimensions and morphological characteristics of Sella Turcica (ST) in patients with impacted maxillary canines (IMC), compared to a control group of patients with normally erupted canines, using CBCT images. A secondary aim was to investigate the relationship between the impaction severity and ST parameters. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed CBCT images from 100 patients. The study group included 55 subjects with IMC (n=38 unilateral, U-IMC; n=17 bilateral, B-IMC) and the control group included 45 subjects exhibiting normally erupted canines. ST parameters included linear dimensions (length, depth, diameter), morphological categorization and bridging types. IMC parameters were canine’s three-dimensional positional angles according to Frankfort Horizontal Plane (FHP) and midsagittal plane (MP). Statistical analyses were conducted using two-sample t-test, Man-Whitney U, and One-Way ANOVA tests. Statistical significance was set at 5%. Results: U-IMC-R and B-IMC exhibited significantly higher FHP-RC-Frontal (p<0.001) and MP-RC (p=0.002) angles, but a lower FHP-RC-Lateral angle (p<0.001) compared to U-IMC-L and control groups. Moreover, U-IMC-L and B-IMC groups exhibited significantly higher FHP-LC-Frontal (p<0.001) and MP-LC (p<0.001) angles, but a lower FHP-LC-Lateral angle (p=0.003) compared to U-IMC-R and control groups. There was a significant inverse relationship of 25.5% between ST length and FHP-LC-Lateral angle (p=0.011). Conclusion: IMC was linked with increased FHP-C-Frontal and MP-C angles, but with a decreased FHP-C-Lateral angles. A significant 25.5% inverse relationship between ST length and FHP-LC-Lateral angle was observed. Besides, IMC occurrence and its three-dimensional position did not exhibit correlation with ST's dimensions or morphology.

Keywords

• tooth
• impacted
• Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
• Sella Turcica

Maksiller Kanin Dişlerinin Gömülü Kalmasının Görülme Sıklığı ve Şiddetinin ile Sella Turcica’nın Boyutları ve Morfolojisi Arasındaki İlişki: Retrospektif Gözlemsel Bir Dental Volumetrik Tomografi Çalışması

Abstract

AMAÇ: DVT görüntüleri kullanılarak, gömülü maksiler kanin dişi (IMC) sahip hastalarda Sella Turcica'nın (ST) boyutları ve morfolojisi, normal şekilde sürmüş kanin dişlerine sahip kontrol grubu hastalarla karşılaştırarak araştırmak amaçlandı. İkincil amaç, gömüklük şiddeti ile Sella Turcica parametreleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Bu retrospektif çalışmada 100 hastadan alınmış DVT görüntüleri analiz edildi. Çalışma grubuna 55 IMC’ye sahip hasta (n=38 tek taraflı, U-IMC; n=17 çift taraflı, B-IMC) ve normal şekilde sürmüş kanin dişlerine sahip 45 kontrol hastası dahil edildi. ST’nın parametreleri; doğrusal boyutları (uzunluğu, derinliği, çapı), morfolojik sınıflandırma ve köprüleşmesi tiplerinden oluşuyordu. IMC parametreleri, kaninin Frankfort Horizontal düzlemi (FHP) ve midsagittal düzleme (MP) göre üç boyutlu pozisyonel açılarından oluşmaktaydı. İstatistiksel analizler, iki-örneklem t-testi, Mann–Whitney U ve Tek-Yönlü Varyans Analizi (ANOVA) testleri kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. İstatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi %5 olarak belirlendi. BULGULAR: U-IMC-R ve B-IMC grupların, U-IMC-L ve kontrol gruplarına kıyasla, FHP-RC-Frontal (p<0.001) ve MP-RC (p=0.002) açılarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha yüksek, ancak FHP-RC-Lateral açısında (p<0.001) daha düşük olduğu bulundu. U-IMC-L ve B-IMC grupların, U-IMC-R ve kontrol gruplarına kıyasla, FHP-LC-Frontal (p<0.001) ve MP-LC (p<0.001) açılarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha yüksek, ancak FHP-LC-Lateral açısında (p=0.003) daha düşük olduğu bulundu. ST’nın uzunluğu ile FHP-LC-Lateral açısı arasında %25.5 istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ters ilişki bulundu (p=0.011). SONUÇ: IMC, etkilenen gömme tarafında artmış FHP-C-Frontal ve MP-C açıları ile ilişkilendirilirken, azalmış FHP-C-Lateral açıları ile ilişkilidir. ST'nın uzunluğu ile FHP-LC-Lateral açısı arasında %25.5 ters ilişki vardır. Bunun dışında, IMC'nin varlığı ve üç boyutlu pozisyonu, ST'nin boyutları veya morfolojisindeki değişikliklerle korelasyon göstermemektedir.

Keywords

• Diş
• gömülü
• Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi
• Sella tursika

References

1. Açıkgöz G, Sarıca İ, Bilge NH, Akgül HM. Examination of the relationship between sella turcica and impacted maxillary canine teeth: a retrospective study. Cumhuriyet Dent. J. 2024;27(1):41-47. doi:10.7126/cumudj.1373121.
2. Agani Sabah G, Dinçer B. Association between sella turcica bridging and the impaction severity of palatally displaced canines: a retrospective study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 2023;164(4):567-574. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.03.016.
3. Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 2014;146:437-41. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.06.010.
4. Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. Eur. J. Orthod. 2004;26:597-604. doi:10.1093/ejo/26.6.597.
5. Baidas LF, Al-Kawari HM, Al-Obaidan Z, Al-Marhoon A, Al-Shahrani S. Association of sella turcica bridging with palatal canine impaction in skeletal Class I and Class II. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2018;10:179-87. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S161164.
6. Bedoya MM, Park JH. A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2009;140(12):1485-1493. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0099.
7. Björk A. Cranial base development: a follow-up x-ray study of the individual variation in growth occurring between the ages of 12 and 20 years and its relation to brain case and face development. Am. J. Orthod. 1955;41(3):198-225. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(55)90005-1.
8. Canigur Bavbek N, Akay G, Kar İ, Tuncer C, Güngör K, Baloş Tuncer B. Relationship between palatally impacted canines and dimensions and morphology of sella turcica: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 2022;162(5):626-635. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.05.017.

9. Davidoff LM, Epstein BS. The abnormal pneumoencephalogram. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Fibiger; 1950.
10. El Wak T, Akl R, Mati M, Khoury E, Ghoubril J. Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction: evaluation using lateral cephalograms and CBCT. Int. Orthod. 2018;16:338-48. doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.003.
11. Gordon MB, Bell AL. A roentgenographic study of the sella turcica in 104 normal children. NY State J. Med. 1922;22:54-59.
12. Haji Ghadimi M, Amini F, Hamedi S, Rakhshan V. Associations among sella turcica bridging, atlas arcuate foramen (ponticulus posticus) development, atlas posterior arch deficiency, and the occurrence of palatally displaced canine impaction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 2017;151:513-20. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.024.
13. Kaya Y, Öztaş E, Goymen M, Keskin S. Sella turcica bridging and ponticulus posticus calcification in subjects with different dental anomalies. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 2021;159(5):627-634. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.11.024.
14. Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, Caltabiano M. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with dental anomalies. Eur. J. Orthod. 2006;28:580-5. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjl032.
15. Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, Caltabiano M. Skeletal anomalies and normal variants in patients with palatally displaced canines. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:727-32. doi:10.2319/082408-448.1.
16. Leonardi R, Farella M, Cobourne MT. An association between sella turcica bridging and dental transposition. Eur. J. Orthod. 2011;33:461-5. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjq106.
17. Meyer-Marcotty P, Reuther T, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Bridging of the sella turcica in skeletal Class III subjects. Eur. J. Orthod. 2010;32(2):148-153. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp081.
18. Najim AA, Nakib LA. A cephalometric study of sella turcica size and morphology among young Iraqi normal population in comparison to patients with maxillary malposed canine. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2011;23:53-58.
19. Omastova A, Valikova P, Cernochova P, Dusek L, Izakovicova Holla L. Morphological types of sella turcica bridging and sella turcica dimensions in relation to palatal canine impaction: a retrospective study. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2023;47(5):124-132.
20. Ortiz PM, Tabbaa S, Flores-Mir C, Al-Jewair T. A CBCT investigation of the association between sella-turcica bridging and maxillary palatal canine impaction. BioMed Res. Int. 2018; :4329050. doi:10.1155/2018/4329050.
21. Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Cassani M, Fraticelli D, Beccari S, Gandini P. Sella turcica bridging and dental anomalies: is there an association? Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2017;27:568-73. doi:10.1111/ipd.12301.
22. Silverman FN. Roentgen standards fo-size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 1957;78(3):451-460.
23. Tepedino M, Laurenziello M, Guida L, et al. Sella turcica and craniofacial morphology in patients with palatally displaced canines: a retrospective study. Folia Morphol. (Warsz). 2020;79(1):51-57. doi:10.5603/FM.a2019.0050.
24. Ugurlu M, Bayrakdar IS, Kahraman F, Oksayan R, Dagsuyu IM. Evaluation of the relationship between impacted canines and three-dimensional sella morphology. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2020;42:23-9. doi:10.1007/s00276-019-02328-2.
25. Vitali FC, Cardoso IV, Cardoso M, Duque TM, Vieira GL. Association between sella turcica bridging and impacted maxillary canines. Gen. Dent. 2022;70(4):54-58.