Pedodonti Hastalarında Diş Sayısı Anomalilerinin ve Ektopik Diş Sürmesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 80 - 86, 31.12.2022

Işıl Özgül Kalyoncu , Büşra Dilara Karaca , Asel Üsdat Öztürk , Figen Eren Giray , Şebnem Erçalık Yalçınkaya

https://doi.org/10.29228/erd.30

Öz

Amaç: Bu retrospektif çalışmada bir grup pedodonti hastasında diş sayı anomalilerinin sıklığı ve dağılımlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Marmara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi arşivinden Planmeca Promax 3D Mid (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finlandiya, 2012) ile 2016-2020 yıllarında çekilmiş 6-14 yaşlar arasındaki çocuk hastalara ait konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) görüntüleri yeniden incelenmiş ve retrospektif olarak hipodonti, hiperdonti, meziodens, ektopik dişlerin sıklığı ve dağılımı değerlendirilmiştir. Betimleyici istatistiksel analiz, Pearson ki-kare ve Fischer kesin olasılık testleri kullanılmış ve veriler istatistiksel olarak p<0,05 anlamlılık düzeyinde analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Pedodonti hastalarının 246’sını kız ve 265’ini erkek hastalar oluşturmuştur (n=511). Hiperdontinin (% 12.7) en sık rastlanan diş sayısı anomalisi olduğu ve bunu hipodontinin (%9.2) takip ettiği belirlenmiştir. Ektopik dişlerin görülme sıklığı % 4.9 olarak kaydedilmiştir. Hiperdonti prevalansının erkek çocuklarda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde yüksek olduğu saptanmıştır (p=0.033).
Sonuç: Diş sayısı anomalileri ortodontik tedavi gerektirebileceğinden detaylı radyolojik inceleme ve dikkatli bir tedavi planlaması gerektirmektedir. Çalışmanın bulguları yüksek kaliteli KIBT görüntülerinin detaylı değerlendirme imkanı vererek diş sayı anomalilerindeki yüksek prevalansı ortaya çıkarmış ve güncel demografik eğilimler hakkında bilgi vermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hipodonti, Hiperdonti, Diş Anomalisi, Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi.

Tooth Number Anomalies and Ectopic Eruption in a Group of Pediatric Dental Patients

Öz

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the frequency and distribution of tooth number anomalies and ectopic eruption in a group of pediatric dental patients.
Methods: The CBCT images of pediatric dental patients (6-14-year-old) taken between 2016-2022 were selected from the archive of Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry. The CBCT images taken with Planmeca Promax 3D Mid (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland, 2012) were retrospectively re-examined to determine the frequency and distribution of the ectopic tooth, hypodontia, hyperdontia, mesiodens, or other. Descriptive statistics were used for evaluating the registered data. Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used for the statistical analysis. Data were statistically analyzed at p<0.05 significance level.
Results: Of the 511 pediatric dental patients aged between 6-14-year-old (10.9±2.63), 246 were girls and 265 were boys. Hyperdontia was the most frequently observed number anomaly (12.7%), followed by Hypodontia (9.2%). The frequency of ectopic teeth was 4,9%. The prevalence of hyperdontia was significantly higher in boys (p=0.033).
Conclusion: Tooth number anomalies require a detailed radiologic examination and careful treatment planning since those anomalies may lead to or complicate the orthodontic treatment. Based on our findings, it was concluded that high-quality CBCT examinations provided detailed evaluation, revealed a high prevalence of tooth number anomalies and gave information about the current demographic trends.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hypodontia, Hyperdontia, Cone-Beam CT, Dental Anomaly.

Kaynakça

• 1. Almaz ME, Sönmez IS, Oba AA. Prevalence and distribution of developmental dental anomalies in pediatric patients. Meandros Med. Dent. J. 2017;18:130.
• 2. AlMulhim A, AlMomen A, AlKhatib A. Ectopic intranasal canine tooth in a child: A rare case report and literature review. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2019; 55: 202–205.
• 3. Amasyalı M, Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu F, Akgün ÖM, Erşahan Eroğlu Ş. Dişlerde Görülen Gelişim Anomalileri: Genel Bir Bakış. Güven Polat G, editör. Dişlerin Gelişimsel Anomalileri. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2018. p.1-4.
• 4. Arte S. . Phenotypic and genotypic features of familial hypodontia. University of Helsinki, PhD thessis. 2001.
• 5. Backman B, Wahlin YB. Variations in number and morphology of permanent teeth in 7-year-old Swedish children. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2001; 11: 11-7.
• 6. Baron C, Houchmand-Cuny M, Enkel B, Lopez-Cazaux S. Prevalence of dental anomalies in French orthodontic patients: A retrospective study. Arch. Pediatr. 2018; 25(7):426–30.
• 7. Bodrumlu E.A., Şenyurt Tazegül F. Prevalence of selected dental anomalies in children and adolescents in Turkey. Tanta Dent J 2022. DOI: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_7_22.
• 8. Brook AH, Brook O’Donnell M, Hone A, et. al. General and craniofacial development are complex adaptive processes influenced by diversity. Aust.Dent.J. 2014; 59(1)13-22.
• 9. Cantekin K, Gümüş H, Aydınbelge M. Üst Çenede Keserler Bölgesinde Bulunan Süpernümerer Dişlerin Neden Olduğu Komplikasyonlar ve Tedavi Yaklaşımları. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2014; 23: 54-58.
• 10. Chuny CJ, Han JH, Kim KH. The pattern and prevalence of hypodontia in Koreans. Oral Dis. 2008; 7:620-625.
• 11. Cobourne MT, Sharpe PT Diseases of the tooth: The genetic and molecular basis of inherited anomalies affecting the dentition. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2013; 2:183-212.
• 12. Çolak H, Uzgur R, Tan E, Hamidi M, Turkal M, Çolak T. Investigation of Prevalence and Characteristics of Mesiodens in a Non-syndromic 11256 Dental Outpatients. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences; 2013; 17: 2684-2689.
• 13. Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine eruption in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbance.Eur. J. Orthodontics.1986;8 (3):133–140.
• 14. Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent. Health; 2007. Sep;24(3):140-4.
• 15. Galluccio G , Castellano M, La Monaca C Genetic Basis of Non-Syndromic Anomalies of Human Tooth Number. Arch. Oral Biol.2012;57(7):918-30.
• 16. Goyal R, Kaur H, Virdi A. Cleidocranial Dysplasia Case Report. Indian Journal of Oral Science. 2012: 174-176. 17. Gumru B, Guldali M, Tarcin B, Idman E, Sertac Peker M. Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography referral profile: Retrospective study in a Turkish paediatric subpopulation. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2021;22(1):66-70.
• 18. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J.Oral.Sci.2011;53(2):231-8.
• 19. Soni H , Manjiri J , Desai H , Vasavada M. An Orthopantomographic Study of Prevalence of Hypodontia and Hyperdontia in Permanent Dentition in Vadodara, Gujarat Indian J. Dent. Re.2018;29(4):529-533.
• 20. Hattab FN, Yassin OM, al-Nimri KS. Talon cusp-clinical significance and management: Case reports. Quintessence Int.1995;26:115-20.
• 21. Karadaş M, Çelikoğlu M, Akdağ MS. Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey. Europan Journal of Dentistry.2014; 8(3): 337-341.
• 22. Laganà G, Venza N, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Fabi F, Danesi C, Cozza P Dental anomalies: Prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:62. 23. Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B; DIMITRA Research Group, http://www.dimitra.be. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr. Radiol. 2018;48:308-316.
• 24. Pallikaraki, G., Sifakakis, I., Gizani, S., Makou, M., Mitsea, A. Developmental dental anomalies assessed by panoramic radiographs in a Greek orthodontic population sample. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent.2019; 20(5):1–6.
• 25. Patil S, Doni B, Kaswan S, Rahman F. Prevalence of dental anomalies in Indian population.J Clin. Exp. Dent.2013; 5: 183-6.
• 26. Polder BJ, Vant Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jangtman AM. A meta analysis of prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32(3):217-226.
• 27. Dental Number Anomalies and Their Prevalence According to Gender and Jaw in School Children 7 to14 Years. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences; 2018; 6(5): 867-873.
• 28. Sharma D, Kaur R, Monga S, et al. Diagnostic imaging: morphological and eruptive disturbances in the permanent teeth. World J. Stomatol. 2015;4:72–80.
• 29. Shokri A, Poorolajal J, Khajeh S, Faramarzi F, Kahnamoui HM. Prevalence of dental anomalies among 7- to 35-year-old people in Hamadan, Iran in 2012-2013 as observed using panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci.Dent.2014;44(1):7-13.
• 30. Suzuki H, Fujimaki S, Chigono T, Yamamura M, Sakabe R, Sakabe J, Niikuni N, Nakajima I, Ejima K, Hashimoto K. Survey on the using limited area cone beam CT in pediatric dentistry. Japan. J. Pediatr. Dent. 2006;44:609-616.
• 31. Vani NV, Saleh SM, Tubaigy FM, Idris AM. Prevalence of developmental dental anomalies among adult population of Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Dent Res. 2016;7:29–33.
• 32. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation; 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2009. pp. 310-65.