PRODUCTIVITY, EFFICIENCY AND ENTREPRENEURIAL - INNOVATIVE UNIVERSITY INDEX: AN ANALYSIS FOR UNIVERSITIES IN TÜRKiYE

Year 2024, , 415 - 426, 30.09.2024

İsmail Yenilmez

https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1455818

Abstract

The productivity and efficiency of universities were analysed in this study. The data and results of the Entrepreneurial and Innovative University Index-EIUI, which is calculated by TÜBITAK every year by considering various information for universities, were used. The study aimed to discuss the index, productivity, and efficiency results comparatively. Four-year data (2019-2022) and the index values were used. Balanced panel data analysis was performed on universities consistently included in the list each year. In the calculation of the index, a weighted sum of values standardized by the min-max method was taken into account. This is available in the calculation methodology of the index. Total factor productivity and stochastic frontier model methods were used for the analysis of productivity and efficiency, respectively. Universities that enter the index list every year and are at the top are effective, but they could not increase their productivity in the previous years. Universities established before 1992 may have approached the saturation level in terms of the input-output relationship, but it can be said that they can maintain their effectiveness. Some public and private universities that were established in 1992 and later have raised their productivity and efficiency. Although the index value and efficiency values overlapped to a certain extent, the significant differences in productivity were remarkable. While the studies in the literature focused on the meta-analysis of the index and the efficiency analysis of universities with various methods, this study presented an inclusive and comparative analysis in terms of index, productivity, and efficiency with panel data analysis.

Keywords

Total Factor Productivity, Stochastic Frontier Model, Triple Helix Model of Innovation, Innovation Helix Framework, Balanced Panel Data

References

• [1] Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS. Efficiency and productivity. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS, eds. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Change. Oxford University Press; 2008:1-106.
• [2] Del Gatto M, Di Liberto A, Petraglia C. Measuring productivity. Working Paper CRENoS 200818, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia; 2008.
• [3] Pieri F. Essays on Productivity and Efficiency Analysis [PhD dissertation]. University of Trento; 2010.
• [4] Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O'Donnell CJ, Battese GE. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. 2nd ed. Springer; 2005.
• [5] Naderi A. Efficiency measurement of higher education units using multilevel frontier analysis. J Prod Anal. 2022;57:79-92.
• [6] Oğuz S. Evaluation of the entrepreneurial and innovative universities in Turkey through multiple-criteria decision making methods. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2022;30(2):353-361.
• [7] Saygın Karagöz Ö, Deveci Kocakoç İ, Üçdoğruk Ş. Girişimcilik ve yenilikçilik faaliyetleri odağında Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin etkinlik analizi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi. 2020;35(4):713-723.
• [8] Türkan S, Özel G. Efficiency of state universities in Turkey during the 2014–2015 academic year and determination of factors affecting efficiency. Educ Sci. 2017;42(191):307-322.
• [9] Mammadov R, Aypay A. Efficiency analysis of research universities in Turkey. Int J Educ Dev. 2020;75:102176.
• [10] Kocak E, Orkcu HH. Measuring the efficiency of Turkish state universities based on a two-stage DEA model. Gazi Univ J Sci. 2021;34(4):1210-1220.
• [11] Portuguez Castro M, Ross Scheede C, Gómez Zermeño MG. The impact of higher education on entrepreneurship and the innovation ecosystem: A case study in Mexico. Sustainability. 2019;11(20):5597.
• [12] Etzkowitz H. Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Soc Sci Inf. 2003;42(3):293-337.
• [13] Erkul A, Kırankabeş MC. Türkiye’de bölgesel inovasyon ekosistemi: Üçlü-sarmal modeli çerçevesinde bir değerlendirme. Verimlilik Dergisi. 2020;(1):55-81.
• [14] Mert N, Cengiz S. Üçlü sarmal yaklaşımına göre Türkiye’nin yenilik yaratma kapasitesi. Bus Econ Res J. 2020;11(4):1001-1012.
• [15] Uslu B, Çalıkoğlu A, Seggie FN, Seggie SH. TÜBİTAK girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversite endeksi kriterlerinin girişimci üniversitelerde öne çıkan faaliyetler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yükseköğretim Dergisi. 2020;10(1):1-11.
• [16] Yenilmez İ, Mert Kantar Y, Arık İ. Efficiency measurement of Turkish universities using the stochastic frontier model. In: EGE 7th International Conference on Applied Sciences; December 24-25, 2022; İzmir, Türkiye. Proceedings. p. 1017-1023. ISBN: 978-605-72197-9-4.
• [17] TÜBİTAK. 2020 yılı girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversite endeksi sonuçları (2020 entrepreneurial and innovative university index results). Available from: https://tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/18842/2020-gyue-2020-print.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2023.
• [18] Arjomandi A, Salleh MI, Mohammadzadeh A. Measuring productivity change in higher education: An application of Hicks–Moorsteen total factor productivity index to Malaysian public universities. J Asia Pac Econ. 2015;20(4):630-643.
• [19] O'Donnell CJ. An aggregate quantity framework for measuring and decomposing productivity change. J Prod Anal. 2012;38(3):255-272.
• [20] Schmidt P. On the statistical estimation of parametric frontier production functions. Rev Econ Stat. 1976;58:238-239.
• [21] Aigner D, Lovell C, Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom. 1977;6(1):21-37.
• [22] Kimatu JN. Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for sustainable development in the era of globalization. J Innov Entrep. 2016;5:16. doi:10.1186/s13731-016-0056-8.
• [23] Kantar M, Yenilmez I. Technical efficiency assessment of Turkish banks using stochastic frontier method. In: Proceeding Book of the I. International Symposium on Economics, Finance, and Econometrics; Istanbul, Türkiye.
• [24] Günay A, Dulupçu MA. Türkiye'de 1992 yılında kurulan devlet üniversitelerinin stratejik planlarının karşılaştırmalı bir analizi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi. 2015;14(1):236-254.