COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE STUDY OF A MODIFIED GASOLINE ENGINE WITH THROTTLE-VALVE-DRIVEN MECHANICAL HYDROGEN INJECTOR

Abstract

In this study, a single-cylinder, air-cooled, 4-stroke, spark-ignited internal combustion engine was modified to operate with both gasoline and gas-phase hydrogen. The engine cylinder cover was redesigned, and an enhanced mechanical hydrogen injector was attached to it. Measurement devices capable of capturing all critical test parameters for comparison purposes were integrated into the test engine. Additionally, all necessary safety equipment was adapted to ensure the safe delivery of hydrogen to the engine. The engine was initially tested with gasoline, and values for engine torque, brake power, specific fuel consumption, TE, and VE were recorded at air throttle openings of 20º to 90º in 10º increments and speeds ranging from 1000 to 3900 rpm. The same parameters were then measured using gas-phase hydrogen. In the experiments conducted with gasoline, optimal performance was achieved at air throttle openings of 60º to 90º and engine speeds of 2350 to 3400 rpm. In the experiments using hydrogen, the most favorable values were observed between 1300 and 1775 rpm at a 30º air throttle opening. When comparing the performance of gasoline and hydrogen in the same engine, results indicated that using gaseous hydrogen led to a 79.54% reduction in engine power and a 73.44% decrease in engine torque. This reduction is considered typical, given that the lower calorific value of hydrogen in the gas phase, at the same pressure and temperature (1 bar, 20 ºC), is approximately 0.010 MJ/l, compared to around 34 MJ/l for gasoline. During testing, issues such as knocking, pre-ignition, and backfire typically associated with intake manifold injection did not occur. No prior studies have employed a direct hydrogen injection method into the combustion chamber with a mechanically activated Hydrogen Injector driven by the intake valve.

Keywords

• Gasoline Engine
• Hydrogen Fueled Engine
• Specific Fuel Consumption
• Thermal Efficiency
• Torque

References

1. [1] Luo Q he, Sun B gang. Inducing factors and frequency of combustion knock in hydrogen internal combustion engines. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016;41:16296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2016.05.257.
2. [2] Wróbel K, Wróbel J, Tokarz W, Lach J, Podsadni K, Czerwiński A. Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles: A Review. Energies (Basel) 2022;15:8937. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238937.
3. [3] Dash SK, Chakraborty S, Elangovan D. A Brief Review of Hydrogen Production Methods and Their Challenges. Energies (Basel) 2023;16:1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031141.
4. [4] Cetinkaya E, Dincer I, Naterer GF. Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37:2071–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2011.10.064.
5. [5] Herdem MS, Mazzeo D, Matera N, Baglivo C, Khan N, Afnan, et al. A brief overview of solar and wind-based green hydrogen production systems: Trends and standardization. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2024;51:340–53 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2023.05.172.
6. [6] Yu M, Wang K, Vredenburg H. Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:21261–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2021.04.016.
7. [7] Zainal BS, Ker PJ, Mohamed H, Ong HC, Fattah IMR, Rahman SMA, et al. Recent advancement and assessment of green hydrogen production technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024;189:113941. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2023.113941.
8. [8] Mulky L, Srivastava S, Lakshmi T, Sandadi ER, Gour S, Thomas NA, et al. An overview of hydrogen storage technologies – Key challenges and opportunities. Mater Chem Phys 2024;325:129710. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2024.129710.

9. [9] Cui X, Su H-Y, Chen R, Yu L, Dong J, Ma C, et al. Room-temperature electrochemical water–gas shift reaction for high purity hydrogen production. Nat Commun 2019;10:86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07937-w.
10. [10] Reitz RD. Directions in internal combustion engine research. Combust Flame 2013;160:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2012.11.002.
11. [11] Schlapbach L, Züttel A. Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications. Nature 2001;414:353–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/35104634.
12. [12] Bradley D, Lawes M, Liu K, Verhelst S, Woolley R. Laminar burning velocities of lean hydrogen–air mixtures at pressures up to 1.0 MPa. Combust Flame 2007;149:162–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2006.12.002.
13. [13] Naber JD, Siebers DL. Hydrogen combustion under diesel engine conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1998;23:363–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00083-9.
14. [14] Gomes Antunes JM, Mikalsen R, Roskilly AP. An experimental study of a direct injection compression ignition hydrogen engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34:6516–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2009.05.142.
15. [15] Hosseini SE, Butler B. An overview of development and challenges in hydrogen powered vehicles. Int J Green Energy 2020;17:13–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2019.1685999.
16. [16] Gurz M, Baltacioglu E, Hames Y, Kaya K. The meeting of hydrogen and automotive: A review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:23334–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2017.02.124.
17. [17] Görgülü A. Hidrojenin Yakıt Olarak İçten Yanmalı Motorlarda Kullanımı ve Diğer Yakıtlarla Mukayesesi. Yök Tez 1994:1–261. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=CY4OWm88FIK9HX-Q31ydNg&no=CY4OWm88FIK9HX-Q31ydNg (accessed November 1, 2024).
18. [18] He L, Jingyuan L, Xiumin Y, Mengliang L, Tian Y. Numerical Study on Combustion and Emission Characteristics of a PFI Gasoline Engine with Hydrogen Direct-Injection. Energy Procedia 2019;158:1449–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2019.01.348.
19. [19] Boretti A. Hydrogen internal combustion engines to 2030. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020;45:23692–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2020.06.022.
20. [20] Hari Ganesh R, Subramanian V, Balasubramanian V, Mallikarjuna JM, Ramesh A, Sharma RP. Hydrogen fueled spark ignition engine with electronically controlled manifold injection: An experimental study. Renew Energy 2008;33:1324–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2007.07.003.
21. [21] White CM, Steeper RR, Lutz AE. The hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engine: a technical review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31:1292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2005.12.001.
22. [22] Navale SJ, Kulkarni RR, Thipse SS. An experimental study on performance, emission and combustion parameters of hydrogen fueled spark ignition engine with the timed manifold injection system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:8299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2017.01.059.
23. [23] Nieminen J, Dincer I. Comparative exergy analyses of gasoline and hydrogen fuelled ICEs. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:5124–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2009.09.003.
24. [24] Verhelst S, Wallner T. Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2009;35:490–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PECS.2009.08.001.
25. [25] Verhelst S, Sierens R. Aspects concerning the optimisation of a hydrogen fueled engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2001;26:981–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00031-3.
26. [26] Stępień Z. A Comprehensive Overview of Hydrogen-Fueled Internal Combustion Engines: Achievements and Future Challenges. Energies (Basel) 2021;14:6504. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206504.
27. [27] Ghazal OH. Performance and combustion characteristic of CI engine fueled with hydrogen enriched diesel. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013; 38:15469–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.037.
28. [28] Habib MA, Abdulrahman GAQ, Alquaity ABS, Qasem NAA. Hydrogen combustion, production, and applications: A review. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2024;100:182–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEJ.2024.05.030.