Research Article

COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH

Volume: 27 Number: 3 September 25, 2026
EN

COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH

Abstract

This study investigates the compressive behavior of the natural helical microstructures found in cuttlefish bone using finite element analysis (FEA). Based on cross-sectional imaging of the bone, three-dimensional models were developed to represent both individual helical wall segments and an integrated cubic structure. The simulations revealed complex stress distributions under compressive loading, with stress concentrations predominantly occurring at the inner and outer curves of the helices. Among all models, the longest and most continuous helical structure exhibited the highest mechanical performance, reaching a maximum von Mises stress of 49.37 MPa and a fracture work of 2.2685 MJ/m³. The integrated cubic structure demonstrated ductile behavior with a peak stress of approximately 43.355 MPa. To account for the bone’s natural porosity (~93%), the results were scaled using the Gibson-Ashby model, yielding an estimated compressive strength of 1.65 MPa-consistent with experimental data in the literature. These findings confirm that the helical microarchitecture of cuttlefish bone provides an efficient balance between lightweight design and mechanical resilience, highlighting nature’s structural optimization.

Keywords

Cuttlefish bone, Compressive Strength, Finite Element Analysis, Bio-Inspired

References

  1. [1] Srinivasan A V, Haritos G K, Hedberg F L. Biomimetics: Advancing man-made materials through guidance from nature. Applied Mechanics Reviews 1991; 44(11): 463-482.
  2. [2] Baer E, Hiltner A, Morgan R J. Biological and synthetic hierarchical composites. Physics Today 1992; 45(10): 60-67.
  3. [3] Kim T G, Shin H, Lim D W. Biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering. Advanced Functional Materials 2012; 22(12): 2446-2468.
  4. [4] Cadman J, Zhou S, Chen Y, Li W, Appleyard R, Li Q. Characterization of cuttlebone for a biomimetic design of cellular structures. Acta Mechanica Sinica 2010; 26(1): 27-35.
  5. [5] Wegst U G, Bai H, Saiz E, Tomsia A P, Ritchie R O. Bioinspired structural materials. Nature Materials 2015; 14(1): 23-36.
  6. [6] Chen P Y, McKittrick J, Meyers M A. Biological materials: functional adaptations and bioinspired designs. Progress in Materials Science 2012; 57(8): 1492-1704.
  7. [7] Meyers M A, McKittrick J, Chen P Y. Structural biological materials: critical mechanics-materials connections. Science 2013; 339(6121): 773-779.
  8. [8] Yang W, Chen I H, Gludovatz B, Zimmermann E A, Ritchie R O, Meyers M A. Natural flexible dermal armor. Advanced Materials 2013; 25(1): 31-48.
  9. [9] Lin A, Meyers M A. Growth and structure in abalone shell. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2005; 390(1-2): 27-41.
  10. [10] Shi Z, Jiang P, Zhu X, Li S, Wang W, Zhao T, Li Y. Unraveling the Power of Disorder: A Bioinspired Cuttlebone Structure with Superior Strength, Energy Absorption and Isotropy. Advanced Science 2026; e75605.
APA
Tuncer, C. (2026). COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, 27(3), 372-384. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1788342
AMA
1.Tuncer C. COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH. Estuscience - Se. 2026;27(3):372-384. doi:10.18038/estubtda.1788342
Chicago
Tuncer, Can. 2026. “COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH”. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 27 (3): 372-84. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1788342.
EndNote
Tuncer C (September 1, 2026) COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 27 3 372–384.
IEEE
[1]C. Tuncer, “COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH”, Estuscience - Se, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 372–384, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.18038/estubtda.1788342.
ISNAD
Tuncer, Can. “COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH”. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 27/3 (September 1, 2026): 372-384. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1788342.
JAMA
1.Tuncer C. COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH. Estuscience - Se. 2026;27:372–384.
MLA
Tuncer, Can. “COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH”. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, Sept. 2026, pp. 372-84, doi:10.18038/estubtda.1788342.
Vancouver
1.Can Tuncer. COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CUTTLEFISH BONE HELICAL MICROSTRUCTURES: A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH. Estuscience - Se. 2026 Sep. 1;27(3):372-84. doi:10.18038/estubtda.1788342