SEISMIC RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES WITH STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3, 374 - 388, 30.09.2020

Esra Güneyisi Rozhan Baker Ayşegül Erdoğan

https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.677039

Öz

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of using steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) on the earthquake response of reinforced concrete (RC) moment resisting frames. For this, two types of RC frames, namely, ductile and nominally ductile RC frames were used. Each frame structure had five storeys and three-bays. The first storey height was 4 m while the height of the other storeys was 3 m. To upgrade the performance of the existing structures under seismic actions, a special unstiffened SPSW system was incorporated into the middle-bays of each frame. SPSWs consist of an infill steel plate, horizontal and vertical boundary elements such as beams (as HBEs) and columns (as VBEs). The structures were modeled analytically using a finite element method and evaluated by both nonlinear static (pushover) and time history analyses. In the pushover analysis, the first mode load distribution and uniform load distribution were used. In the dynamic time history analysis, a set of ground motion records was employed. As a seismic hazard level, 2% probability of exceedance in 50-year period was taken into consideration. The seismic response of the ductile and nominally ductile RC frames with and without SPSWs was examined comparatively. The results indicated a considerable enhancement in the earthquake performance of both the ductile and the nominally ductile RC frame structures with SPSWs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dynamic response, , Nonlinear analysis, , Reinforced concrete frame, Seismic performance, , Steel plate shear wall

Kaynakça

• [1] Robinson K, Ames D. Steel plate shear walls: Library seismic upgrade. Mod Steel Constr, AISC 2000; 56-60.
• [2] Seilie IF, Hooper JD. Steel plate shear walls: Practical design and construction. Mod Steel Constr, AISC 2005; 45: 37-43.
• [3] Monnier AB, Harasimowicz AP. Shear strength. Mod Steel Constr, AISC 2007; 22-25.
• [4] Kristeva N. Trimming the Fat. Mod Steel Constr, AISC 2010; 36-39.
• [5] Zirakian T, Zhang J. Study on seismic retrofit of structures using SPSW systems and LYP steel material. Earthq Struct 2016; 10: 1-23.
• [6] Clayton PM. Self-centering steel plate shear walls: Development of design procedure and evaluation of seismic performance. MSc, Washington University, Washington, 2010.
• [7] Sabelli R, Bruneau M. Design Guide No 20: Steel plate shear walls. AISC, Chicago, 2006.
• [8] Astaneh-Asl A. Seismic behavior and design of steel shear walls. Technical Report, Structural Steel Educational Council, USA: Moraga, CA, 2001.
• [9] Moshiri A. Seismic design study of steel plate shear wall. Structural Engineering in the College of the Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, 2012.
• [10] Ghosh S, Adam F, Das A. Design of steel plate shear walls considering inelastic drift demand. J Constr Steel Res 2009; 65: 1431-1437.
• [11] Thorburn LJ, Kulak GL, Montgomery CJ. Analysis of steel plate shear walls. Structural Engineering Report No:107, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, 1983.
• [12] Driver RG, Kulak GL, Kennedy DL, Elwi AE. Cyclic test of four-story steel plate shear wall. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1998; 124: 112-120.
• [13] Berman JW, Bruneau M. Experimental investigation of light-gauge steel plate shear walls for the seismic retrofit of buildings. Technical Report No: MCEER-03-0001, NY, 2003a.
• [14] Berman J, Bruneau M. Plastic analysis and design of steel plate shear walls. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2003b; 129: 1448-1456.
• [15] Vian D, Bruneau M. Testing of special LYS steel plate shear walls. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; August 2004; Vancouver BC, Canada.
• [16] Qu B, Bruneau M. Design of steel plate shear walls considering boundary frame moment resisting action. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2009; 135: 1511-1521.
• [17] Shekastehband B, Azaraxsh AA, Showkati H. Hysteretic behavior of perforated steel plate shear walls with beam-only connected infill plates. Steel Compos Struct 2017; 25: 505-521.
• [18] Zirakian T, Zhang J. Structural performance of SPSWs with unstiffened slender, moderate, and stocky LYP steel infill plates. In: 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 24-28 September 2012; Lisbon, Portugal.
• [19] Xu L, Li Z, Lv Y. Nonlinear seismic damage control of steel frame-steel plate shear wall structures using MR dampers. Earthq Struct 2014; 7: 937-953.
• [20] Edalati SA, Yadollahi Y, Pakar I, Bayat M. On the effect of GFRP fibers on retrofitting steel shear walls with low yield stress. Earthq Struct 2015; 8: 1453-1461.
• [21] Bypour M, Gholhaki M, Kioumarsi M, Kioumarsi B. Nonlinear analysis to investigate effect of connection type on behavior of steel plate shear wall in RC frame. Eng Struct 2019; 179: 611-624.
• [22] Caccese V, Elgaaly M, Chen R. Experimental study of thin steel-plate shear walls under cyclic load. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1993; 119: 573–587.
• [23] Tromposch EW Kulak GL. Cyclic and static behaviour of thin panel steel plate shear walls. Structual Engineering Report 145, Departure of Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1987.
• [24] Timler PA, Kulak GL. Experimental study of steel plate shear walls. Structural Engineering Report No. 114, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, 1983.
• [25] Qu B, Bruneau M, Lin CH, Tsai KC. Testing of full-scale two-story steel plate shear wall with reduced beam section connections and composite floors. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2008; 134: 364–373.
• [26] Vian D, Bruneau MK, Tsai C, Lin YC. Special perforated steel plate shear walls with reduced beam section anchor beams. I: Experimental investigation. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2009a; 135(3): 211–220.
• [27] Vian D, Bruneau MK, Tsai C, Lin YC. Special perforated steel plate shear walls with reduced beam section anchor beams. II: Analysis and design recommendations. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2009b; 135(3): 221–228.
• [28] Sadjadi R, Kianoush MR, and Talebi S. Seismic performance of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. Eng Struct 2007; 29(9): 2365-2380.
• [29] Canadian Standards Association CAN3-A23. Design of Concrete Structures for Buildings, Technical Committee, Canada: Rexdale, Ontario, 1994.
• [30] National Building Code of Canada NBCC, Associate Committee on the National Building Code, National Research Council of Canada: Ottawa, Ontario, 1995.
• [31] American Institute of Steel Construction AISC, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-10, Chicago, 2010.
• [32] Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA-356, Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington DC, 2000.
• [33] The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center PEER, User’s Manual for the PEER Ground Motion Database Application, University of California, Berkeley, 2011.