SOLAR ENERGY ASSISTS SEDIMENT MICROBIAL FUEL CELL TO GENERATE GREEN ENERGY FROM LIQUID ORGANIC WASTE

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 173 - 183, 28.06.2022

Onur Can Türker

https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1031449

Öz

Simultaneous liquid organic waste disposal and electricity generation were achieved by a solar-assist sediment microbial fuel cell (S-SMFC) in terms of an ecological and economical perspective. In this respect, 840 mL house environment liquid organic waste which contains 10% juice and 10% sugary tea were disposed by electrogenic bacteria and converted electricity with solar energy. A 100 F capacitor was easily charged 29 times with generated electricity. S-SMFC was disposed 10 mL more waste than control due to more electrical bacteria density on the graphite electrode. In this case, Proteobacteria and Firmucutes were categorized dominate bacteria groups, and they were found in the S-SMFC as 54% and 28%, respectively. Importantly, solar energy increased population density of these groups in the S-SMFC and the density on the graphite electrode increased more than 19% according to control. Some bacteria which were associated with electricity production in the S-SMFC were to Azospirillum fermentarium, Clostridium sp., Pseudomonas guangdongensis, Bacteroides sp., Azovibrio restrictus, Clostridium pascui, Levilinea saccharolytica, Seleniivibrio woodruffii, Geovibrio ferrireducens. Consequently, S-SMFC presents innovative, crucial and simple methodology in order to convert liquid organic waste into the green energy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Green energy, sediment microbial fuel cell, electrogenic bacteria, organic waste

Destekleyen Kurum

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

Proje Numarası

2200012

Teşekkür

The author would like to thank to Prof. Dr. Cengiz TÜRE (The Head of Ecology Section, Eskişehir Technical University, department of Biology and Dr. Anıl YAKAR (ECOWATT, Inc).

Kaynakça

• [1] Li H, Guo H, Huang N et al. Health risks of exposure to waste pollution: evidence from Beijing, China Economic Review, 2020; 63, 101540.
• [2] Shi Y, Deng Y, Wangn G et al. Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China, Energy, 2020; 196, 117071.
• [3] Kaiser J, Lerch M, Sedimentary faecal lipids as indicators of Baltic Sea sewage pollution and population growth since 1860 AD, Environmental Research, 2021; 112305.
• [4] Uğur A, Yılmaz OS, Çelen M, Ateş AM, Gülgen F, Şanlı FB. Determination of mucilage in the sea of marmara using remote sensing techniques with google earth engine, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 2021; 8, 423-434.
• [5] Yılmaz S, Küçüker MA, Kahraman D. Metagenomic characterization of planktonic communities during a mucilage event in the Çanakkale Strait (Dardanelles), Turkey, Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 2021; 6, 421-427.
• [6] Chun Y, Hua T, Anantharaman A et al. Organic matter removal from a membrane bioreactor effluent for reverse osmosis fouling mitigation by microgranular adsorptive filtration system, Desalination, 2021; 506, 115016.
• [7] Tałałaj LA, Bartkowska I, Biedka P. Treatment of young and stabilized landfill leachate by integrated sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and reverse osmosis (RO) process, Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 2021; 16, 100502.
• [8] Chen W, Zhuo X, He C et al. Molecular investigation into the transformation of dissolved organic matter in mature landfill leachate during treatment in a combined membrane bioreactor-reverse osmosis process, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021; 397, 122759.
• [9] Türker OC. Simultaneous boron (B) removal and electricity generation from domestic wastewater using duckweed-based wastewater treatment reactors coupled with microbial fuel cell, Journal of Environmental Management, 2018; 228, 20-31.
• [10] Türker OC, Türe C, Yakar A, Saz Ç. Engineered wetland reactors with different media types to treat drinking water contaminated by boron (B), Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017; 168, 823-832.
• [11] Wang C, Jiang H. Real-time monitoring of sediment bulking through a multi-anode sediment microbial fuel cell as reliable biosensor, Science of The Total Environment, 2019; 697, 134009.
• [12] Prasad J, Tripathi, RK. Voltage control of sediment microbial fuel cell to power the AC load, Journal of Power Sources, 2020; 450, 227721.
• [13] Kabutey FT, Ding J, Zhao Q et al. Pollutant removal and bioelectricity generation from urban river sediment using a macrophyte cathode sediment microbial fuel cell (mSMFC), Bioelectrochemistry, 2019; 128, 241-251.
• [14] Neethu B, Ghangrekar M. Electricity generation through a photo sediment microbial fuel cell using algae at the cathode, Water Science and Technology, 2017; 76, 3269-3277.
• [15] Yang X, Chen S. Microorganisms in sediment microbial fuel cells: Ecological niche, microbial response, and environmental function, Science of The Total Environment, 2021; 756, 144145.
• [16] Rathour R, Patel D, Shaikh S et al. Eco-electrogenic treatment of dyestuff wastewater using constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell system with an evaluation of electrode-enriched microbial community structures, Bioresource Technology, 2019; 285, 121349.
• [17] Helder M. Design criteria for the plant-microbial fuel cell: electricity generation with living plants: from lab tot application, 2012.
• [18] Commault AS, Lear G, Packer MA et al. Weld, Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells, Bioresource Technology, 2013; 139, 226-234.
• [19] Kim JR, Cheng S, Oh SE et al. Power generation using different cation, anion, and ultrafiltration membranes in microbial fuel cells, Environmental Science & Technology 2007; 41, 1004-1009.
• [20] Chu N, Zhang L, Hao W et al. Rechargeable microbial fuel cell based on bidirectional extracellular electron transfer, Bioresource Technology, 2021; 329, 124887.
• [21] Yi Y, Xie B, Zhao T et al. Effect of external resistance on the sensitivity of microbial fuel cell biosensor for detection of different types of pollutants, Bioelectrochemistry, 2019; 125, 71-78.
• [22] Finch AS, Mackie TD, Sund CD et al. Metabolite analysis of Clostridium acetobutylicum: fermentation in a microbial fuel cell, Bioresource Technology, 2011; 102, 312-315.
• [23] Yang G, Han L, Wen J et al. Pseudomonasguangdongensis sp. nov., isolated from an electroactive biofilm, and emended description of the genus Pseudomonas Migula 1894, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2013; 63, 4599-4605.
• [24] Tang X, Qiao J, Chen C et al. Bacterial communities of polychlorinated biphenyls polluted soil around an e-waste recycling workshop, Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal, 2013; 22, 562-573.
• [25] Suwanvitaya P, Boocha S. Performance of Dairy Wastewater Intrinsic Bacteria in Microbial Fuel Cell, Thai Environmental Engineering Journal, 2021; 35, 43-52.
• [26] Lu L, Xing D, Ren ZJ. Microbial community structure accompanied with electricity production in a constructed wetland plant microbial fuel cell, Bioresource Technology, 2015; 195, 115-121.
• [27] Lin XQ, Li ZL, Liang B et al. Wang, Identification of biofilm formation and exoelectrogenic population structure and function with graphene/polyanliline modified anode in microbial fuel cell, Chemosphere, 2019; 219, 358-364.
• [28] Katuri KP, Enright AM, O'Flaherty V et al. Microbial analysis of anodic biofilm in a microbial fuel cell using slaughterhouse wastewater, Bioelectrochemistry, 2012; 87, 164-171.