Authority, access, and return have been growing preoccupations of ethnomusicologists and institutions in relation to First Peoples’ musical knowledges over the past 35 years. In recent years, this work has become increasingly aligned with developments in Indigenous Data Sovereignty. However, agency, authority, and power in relation to new tools and media for creative and cultural resistance and thrivance have much longer histories. These histories are evident in Indigenous broadcasting, communications, and media movements over the past 50 years in Australia, Canada, and elsewhere. It is also shown in First Peoples’ accounts of creative responses to changing environments from deep history to the present. This article presents an abbreviated version of a roundtable delivered to the International Council for Traditions of Music and Dance in Aotearoa/New Zealand (ICTMD), 8 – 16 January 2025, exploring these themes. The roundtable comprised two speakers from Australia (Tiriki Onus and Sally Treloyn) and three from Canada (Bert Crowfoot, Sandra Crowfoot, and Mary Ingraham), all of whom had met previously in Australia and Canada, and online. The intention of the roundtable was to present perspectives on and approaches that are relevant to data sovereignty across a range of historical and contemporary, community, field, and institutional contexts. The goal of the panel, and it follows this article, is to support a dialogue about and develop practice in relation to data sovereignty in institutional and disciplinary contexts, where community-based creative action, archiving, and research are held as authoritative and critical spaces.
Indigenous data sovereignty Australia Canada community archiving
1727131
Authority, access, and return have been growing preoccupations of ethnomusicologists and institutions in relation to First Peoples’ musical knowledges over the past 35 years. In recent years, this work has become increasingly aligned with developments in Indigenous Data Sovereignty. However, agency, authority, and power in relation to new tools and media for creative and cultural resistance and thrivance have much longer histories. These histories are evident in Indigenous broadcasting, communications, and media movements over the past 50 years in Australia, Canada, and elsewhere. It is also shown in First Peoples’ accounts of creative responses to changing environments from deep history to the present. This article presents an abbreviated version of a roundtable delivered to the International Council for Traditions of Music and Dance in Aotearoa/New Zealand (ICTMD), 8 – 16 January 2025, exploring these themes. The roundtable comprised two speakers from Australia (Tiriki Onus and Sally Treloyn) and three from Canada (Bert Crowfoot, Sandra Crowfoot, and Mary Ingraham), all of whom had met previously in Australia and Canada, and online. The intention of the roundtable was to present perspectives on and approaches that are relevant to data sovereignty across a range of historical and contemporary, community, field, and institutional contexts. The goal of the panel, and it follows this article, is to support a dialogue about and develop practice in relation to data sovereignty in institutional and disciplinary contexts, where community-based creative action, archiving, and research are held as authoritative and critical spaces.
Indigenous data sovereignty Australia Canada communtiy archiving
1727131
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Müzikoloji ve Etnomüzikoloji |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Proje Numarası | 1727131 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Temmuz 2025 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 25 Haziran 2025 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 22 Temmuz 2025 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 |