Research Article

Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening

Volume: 8 Number: 5 September 4, 2022
EN

Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening

Abstract

Objectives: To provide demographical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients diagnosed in a tertiary clinic with opportunistic screening and diagnostic workup and compare the results with the available national and global breast cancer statistics. 

Methods: Clinical and pathological data of breast cancer patients diagnosed in our tertiary breast clinic between March 14, 2017 and February 28, 2020 have been entered into a database and analyzed retrospectively. Results were analyzed and compared with the national and global statistics. 

Results: The total number of patients included in this study were 137 and the number of tumors was 145. Sixty-four (46.7%) patients were detected in screening. All of the patients were female. The mean age was 51.8 years. Eighteen (13.1%) patients were young females (< 40 years), 55 (40.1%) were in 40-49 years, 26 (18.9%) in 50-59 years, 24 (17.5%) in > 60-69 years, 14 (10.2%) in > 70 years. Of the invasive cancers, 100 (79.4%) were invasive ductal, 15 (11.9%) invasive lobular, 6 (4.8%) pleomorphic lobular, 4 (3.2%) papillary, and 1 (0.8%) tubular cancer. Distribution of stages were: 13.1% stage 0, 38.6% stage I, 29.6% stage II, 10.3% stage III, and 8.2% stage IV. The mean tumor diameter was 26.6 mm. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) were positive in 82.5%, 61.9% and 15.8% of the tumors respectively. 

Conclusions: Results of this study are in accordance with the latest results of the National Breast cancer database, a project governed by the Turkish Federation of Breast Disease Societies (TMHDF), considering the tumor size, age distribution, histologic subtype analysis, receptor status. However, the percentage of early-stage tumors was higher in this study.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 2019;144:1941-53.
  2. 2. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures-2019-2020.pdf
  3. 3. Ozmen V. Breast cancer in Turkey: clinical and histopathological characteristics (analysis of 13.240 patients). J Breast Health 2014;10:98-105.
  4. 4. Özmen V, Özmen T, Doğru V. Breast cancer in Turkey: an analysis of 20.000 patients with breast cancer. Eur J Breast Health 2019;15:141-6.
  5. 5. Kayhan A, Gurdal SO, Ozaydin N, Cabioglu N, Ozturk E, Ozcinar B, et al. Successful first-round results of a Turkish breast cancer screening program with mammography in Bahcesehir, Istanbul. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:1693-7.
  6. 6. Özmen V, Gürdal SÖ, Cabioğlu N, Özcinar B, Özaydin AN, Kayhan A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in Turkey, a developing country: results from Bahçeşehir ammography Screening Project. Eur J Breast Health 2017;13:117-22.
  7. 7. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, chapter 32, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 7th edition, 2010. Available from:URL: http://www.scribd.com/doc/41422083/Complete-AJCC-CancerStaging-Manual-7e-Text
  8. 8. DeSantis CE, Bray F, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Anderson BO, Jemal A. International variation in female breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24:1495-506.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Radiology and Organ Imaging

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 4, 2022

Submission Date

December 8, 2021

Acceptance Date

February 24, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 8 Number: 5

APA
Güldoğan, N., Daldal, İ., Soyder, A., Yılmaz, E., & Arslan, A. (2022). Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening. The European Research Journal, 8(5), 598-605. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1033431
AMA
1.Güldoğan N, Daldal İ, Soyder A, Yılmaz E, Arslan A. Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening. Eur Res J. 2022;8(5):598-605. doi:10.18621/eurj.1033431
Chicago
Güldoğan, Nilgün, İlke Daldal, Aykut Soyder, Ebru Yılmaz, and Aydan Arslan. 2022. “Understanding the Paradigma of Opportunistic Screening”. The European Research Journal 8 (5): 598-605. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1033431.
EndNote
Güldoğan N, Daldal İ, Soyder A, Yılmaz E, Arslan A (September 1, 2022) Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening. The European Research Journal 8 5 598–605.
IEEE
[1]N. Güldoğan, İ. Daldal, A. Soyder, E. Yılmaz, and A. Arslan, “Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening”, Eur Res J, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 598–605, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.18621/eurj.1033431.
ISNAD
Güldoğan, Nilgün - Daldal, İlke - Soyder, Aykut - Yılmaz, Ebru - Arslan, Aydan. “Understanding the Paradigma of Opportunistic Screening”. The European Research Journal 8/5 (September 1, 2022): 598-605. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1033431.
JAMA
1.Güldoğan N, Daldal İ, Soyder A, Yılmaz E, Arslan A. Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening. Eur Res J. 2022;8:598–605.
MLA
Güldoğan, Nilgün, et al. “Understanding the Paradigma of Opportunistic Screening”. The European Research Journal, vol. 8, no. 5, Sept. 2022, pp. 598-05, doi:10.18621/eurj.1033431.
Vancouver
1.Nilgün Güldoğan, İlke Daldal, Aykut Soyder, Ebru Yılmaz, Aydan Arslan. Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening. Eur Res J. 2022 Sep. 1;8(5):598-605. doi:10.18621/eurj.1033431