Understanding the paradigma of opportunistic screening
Abstract
Objectives: To provide demographical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients diagnosed in a tertiary clinic with opportunistic screening and diagnostic workup and compare the results with the available national and global breast cancer statistics.
Methods: Clinical and pathological data of breast cancer patients diagnosed in our tertiary breast clinic between March 14, 2017 and February 28, 2020 have been entered into a database and analyzed retrospectively. Results were analyzed and compared with the national and global statistics.
Results: The total number of patients included in this study were 137 and the number of tumors was 145. Sixty-four (46.7%) patients were detected in screening. All of the patients were female. The mean age was 51.8 years. Eighteen (13.1%) patients were young females (< 40 years), 55 (40.1%) were in 40-49 years, 26 (18.9%) in 50-59 years, 24 (17.5%) in > 60-69 years, 14 (10.2%) in > 70 years. Of the invasive cancers, 100 (79.4%) were invasive ductal, 15 (11.9%) invasive lobular, 6 (4.8%) pleomorphic lobular, 4 (3.2%) papillary, and 1 (0.8%) tubular cancer. Distribution of stages were: 13.1% stage 0, 38.6% stage I, 29.6% stage II, 10.3% stage III, and 8.2% stage IV. The mean tumor diameter was 26.6 mm. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) were positive in 82.5%, 61.9% and 15.8% of the tumors respectively.
Conclusions: Results of this study are in accordance with the latest results of the National Breast cancer database, a project governed by the Turkish Federation of Breast Disease Societies (TMHDF), considering the tumor size, age distribution, histologic subtype analysis, receptor status. However, the percentage of early-stage tumors was higher in this study.
Keywords
References
- 1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 2019;144:1941-53.
- 2. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures-2019-2020.pdf
- 3. Ozmen V. Breast cancer in Turkey: clinical and histopathological characteristics (analysis of 13.240 patients). J Breast Health 2014;10:98-105.
- 4. Özmen V, Özmen T, Doğru V. Breast cancer in Turkey: an analysis of 20.000 patients with breast cancer. Eur J Breast Health 2019;15:141-6.
- 5. Kayhan A, Gurdal SO, Ozaydin N, Cabioglu N, Ozturk E, Ozcinar B, et al. Successful first-round results of a Turkish breast cancer screening program with mammography in Bahcesehir, Istanbul. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:1693-7.
- 6. Özmen V, Gürdal SÖ, Cabioğlu N, Özcinar B, Özaydin AN, Kayhan A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in Turkey, a developing country: results from Bahçeşehir ammography Screening Project. Eur J Breast Health 2017;13:117-22.
- 7. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, chapter 32, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 7th edition, 2010. Available from:URL: http://www.scribd.com/doc/41422083/Complete-AJCC-CancerStaging-Manual-7e-Text
- 8. DeSantis CE, Bray F, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Anderson BO, Jemal A. International variation in female breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24:1495-506.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Radiology and Organ Imaging
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Nilgün Güldoğan
This is me
0000-0001-8322-8374
Türkiye
İlke Daldal
This is me
0000-0003-4413-4011
Türkiye
Aykut Soyder
0000-0002-4206-8738
Türkiye
Ebru Yılmaz
This is me
0000-0001-8681-1565
Türkiye
Aydan Arslan
*
0000-0002-6073-1927
Türkiye
Publication Date
September 4, 2022
Submission Date
December 8, 2021
Acceptance Date
February 24, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 8 Number: 5