Research Article

Effects of intrauterine devices on female sexual function: a cross-sectional study

Volume: 8 Number: 5 September 4, 2022
EN

Effects of intrauterine devices on female sexual function: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the differences in sexual functions between women using copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) and levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LND-IUS).

Methods: A total of 125 women between the ages of 20 and 40 were included in the study. The demographic data of all participants were recorded. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was performed to all participants. Study participants were divided into 3 groups; 42 Cu-IUD users, 42 LND-IUS users, and 41 control (not use contraceptive) group, then compared. Women with a total score lower than ≤ 26.5 were considered as having sexual dysfunction.

Results: The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) was 56.8% among the participants. The total FSFI scores of Cu-IUD and LNG-IUS groups were similar. Moreover, the FSFI score of both IUD users was lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The presence of Cu-IUD affected arousal more than pain, satisfaction, lubrication and orgasm scores (p = 0.016). Pain score was similar among IUD groups and significantly lower than controls (p < 0.001). Moreover, orgasm and satisfaction scores were found to be significantly higher in the control group than in the both IUD groups (p < 0.001). All of three groups were also similar about desire and lubrication domains of FSFI.

Conclusions: In conclusion, this study found that Cu-IUD and LNG-IUS users did not differ in terms of sexual function according to scores calculated by FSFI.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009. Fertil Steril 2012;98:893-7.
  2. 2. Buhling KJ, Zite NB, Lotke P, Black K. Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception: a review. Contraception 2014;89:162-73.
  3. 3. Hubacher D, Chen PA, Park S. Side effects from the copper IUD: do they decrease over time? Contraception 2009;79:356-62.
  4. 4. Koc I. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of consanguineous marriages in Turkey. J Biosoc Sci 2008:40;137-48.
  5. 5. Cim N, Soysal S, Sayan S, Yildizhan B, Karaman E, Cetin O, et al. Two years follow-up of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding after insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2018;83:569-75.
  6. 6. Skrzypulec V, Drosdzol A. Evaluation of quality of life and sexual functioning of women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive system Mirena. Coll Antropol 2008;32:1059-68.
  7. 7. World Health Organization. Reproductive Health, Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice. World Health Organization 2006.
  8. 8. Banaei M, Alidost F, Ghasemi E, Dashti S. A comparison of sexual function in primiparous and multiparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol 2020;40:411-8.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 4, 2022

Submission Date

January 6, 2022

Acceptance Date

April 12, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 8 Number: 5

AMA
1.Bayram F, Kender Erturk N. Effects of intrauterine devices on female sexual function: a cross-sectional study. Eur Res J. 2022;8(5):606-611. doi:10.18621/eurj.1053425

Cited By