Safety of allergen immunotherapy in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection
Abstract
Objectives: The aims of presenting study were trying to expose the course of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus) in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), to compare the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and pneumonia rates in patients with AR receiving allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and patients did not receiving AIT (non-receivers) and to define possible risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 positivity in patients with AR.
Methods: A total of 419 patients with AR who were being followed-up in a tertiary allergy clinic between June 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, were selected for the study.
Results: Seventy-nine (18.9%) patients became infected with the SARS-CoV-2 [32 (19.6%) patients in AR patients with AIT and 47 (18.4%) patients in non-receivers] and the rate of pneumonia was 2.4% [12.7% of SARS-CoV-2 (+) patients]. There was no significant difference was determined between the AR patients with AIT and the non-receivers in regard of the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection, pneumonia and hospitalization (p = 0.864, p = 0.055 and p = 0.075; respectively). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of gender, duration of disease, sensitivity to allergens (atopy) and serum IgE levels (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.001; respectively). The accompanying comorbidities, eosinophil cout, AIT and duration of AIT were not found to be associated with an increased risk SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity. However, female gender was shown to be associated with an decreased risk for SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity (OR, 0.571; 95% confidence interval, 0.330-0.987; p = 0.045).
Conclusions: The course of SARS-CoV-2 is similar in patients with AR who underwent AIT and patients with AR who did not undergo AIT, and AIT does not seem to increase the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Keywords
Project Number
References
- 1. Aboubakr HA, Sharafeldin TA, Goyal SM. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses in the environment and on common touch surfaces and the influence of climatic conditions: a review. Transbound Emerg Dis 2021;68:296-312.
- 2. Rostami A, Sepidarkish M, Leeflang MMG, Riahi SM, Nourollahpour Shiadeh M, Esfandyari S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021;27:331-40.
- 3. Settipane RA. Demographics and epidemiology of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc 2001;22:185-9.
- 4. Singh K, Axelrod S, Bielory L. The epidemiology of ocular and nasal allergy in the United States, 1988-1994. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:778-83 e6.
- 5. Durrani SR, Montville DJ, Pratt AS, Sahu S, DeVries MK, Rajamanickam V, et al. Innate immune responses to rhinovirus are reduced by the high-affinity IgE receptor in allergic asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130:489-95.
- 6. Wark PA, Johnston SL, Bucchieri F, Powell R, Puddicombe S, Laza-Stanca V, et al. Asthmatic bronchial epithelial cells have a deficient innate immune response to infection with rhinovirus. J Exp Med 2005;201:937-47.
- 7. Novak N, Cabanillas B. Viruses and asthma: the role of common respiratory viruses in asthma and its potential meaning for SARS-CoV-2. Immunology 2020;161:83-93.
- 8. Gill MA, Bajwa G, George TA, Dong CC, Dougherty, II, Jiang N, et al. Counterregulation between the FcepsilonRI pathway and antiviral responses in human plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Immunol 2010;184:5999-6006.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Allergy
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 4, 2022
Submission Date
March 11, 2022
Acceptance Date
July 7, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 8 Number: 5