Does chronic venous insufficiency affect cardiac functions? A speckle tracking echocardiography study

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is subtle cardiac dysfunction in patients with chronic venous insufficiency.

Methods: Age and sex matched 56 patients with a score of C3 and above in the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological classification and 56 healthy volunteers were included in the study. All subjects were evaluated by detailed echocardiographic examination, including two-dimensional strain echocardiographic analysis by speckle tracking method.

Results: Mitral E wave deceleration time (EDT), E and A wave velocity, E/e' ratio for left ventricle, tricuspid EDT, E/e’ ratio for right ventricle and systolic pulmonary artery pressure were found high as significant statistically in patients groups (p < 0.05). But no any statistically significant difference was observed in other parameters between two groups.

Conclusions: There may be an increase in diastolic filling pressures in patients with chronic venous insufficiency due to the increased preload in the supine position. This condition seems to be clinically important in patients at high risk for heart failure due to the presumption of the early treatment of chronic venous insufficiency may reduce the risk of heart failure evolvement.

Keywords

• Chronic venous insufficiency
• echocardiography
• strain
• heart failure
• speckle tracking

References

1. 1. Eberhardt RT, Raffetto JD. Chronic venous insufficiency. Circulation 2014;130:333-46.
2. 2. Robertson L, Evans C, Fowkes FG. Epidemiology of chronic venous disease. Phlebology 2008;23:103-11.
3. 3. Mozes G. Development and anatomy of the venous system. Handbook of venous disorders. 2001:11-35.
4. 4. Caggiati A, Bergan JJ, Gloviczki P, Jantet G, Wendell-Smith CP, Partsch H. Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limbs: an international interdisciplinary consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:416-22.
5. 5. Pappas PJ. Pathology and cellular physiology of chronic venous insufficiency. Handbook of venous disorders. 2001.
6. 6. Wittens C, Davies AH, Bækgaard N, Broholm R, Cavezzi A, Chastanet S, et al. Editor's Choice - Management of Chronic Venous Disease: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015;49:678-737.
7. 7. Badeer HS. Cardiac output and venous return as interdependent and independent variables. Cardiology 1981;67:65-72.
8. 8. Naeije R, Brimioulle S, Dewachter L. Biomechanics of the right ventricle in health and disease (2013 Grover Conference series). Pulm Circ 2014;4:395-406.

9. 9. Zhang J, Wu Z, Feng Q, Huang H, Ma Y. Cardiac Doppler parameters and progress in clinical manifestation of primary lower extremity varicose veins: a prospective study in China. Front Surg 2022;9:791598.
10. 10. Rusinovich Y, Rusinovich V. Cardiac response to changes in central venous sonomorphology: Mechanism of impaired heart relaxation in patients with varicose veins of lower extremities. Phlebology 2022;37:644-50.
11. 11. Rusinovich Y, Rusinovich V. Association between right heart diastolic function and clinical presentation of chronic venous disease and primary varicose veins of lower extremities. Phlebology 2020;35:513-9.
12. 12. Lurie F, Passman M, Meisner M, Dalsing M, Masuda E, Welch H, et al. The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020;8:342-52.
13. 13. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:685-713.
14. 14. López-Candales A, Rajagopalan N, Gulyasy B, Edelman K, Bazaz R. Comparative echocardiographic analysis of mitral and tricuspid annular motion: differences explained with proposed anatomic-structural correlates. Echocardiography 2007;24:353-9.
15. 15. Saxena N, Rajagopalan N, Edelman K, López-Candales A. Tricuspid annular systolic velocity: a useful measurement in determining right ventricular systolic function regardless of pulmonary artery pressures. Echocardiography 2006;23:750-5.
16. 16. Schiller NB. Pulmonary artery pressure estimation by Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography. Cardiol Clin 1990;8:277-87.
17. 17. Yock PG, Popp RL. Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation 1984;70:657-62.
18. 18. Tadic M, Nita N, Schneider L, Kersten J, Buckert D, Gonska B, et al. The predictive value of right ventricular longitudinal strain in pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, and valvular diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:e698158.
19. 19. Feigenbaum H, Mastouri R, Sawada S. A practical approach to using strain echocardiography to evaluate the left ventricle. Circ J 2012;76:1550-5.
20. 20. López-Candales A. Applicability of automated functional imaging for assessing right ventricular function. Echocardiography 2013;30:919-28.
21. 21. Delgado V, Mollema SA, Ypenburg C, Tops LF, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, et al. Relation between global left ventricular longitudinal strain assessed with novel automated function imaging and biplane left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:1244-50.
22. 22. Rusinovich Y, Rusinovich V. Cardiac Doppler in patients with primary varicose veins of lower extremities. Phlebology 2020;35:62-6.
23. 23. Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC, et al. Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transthoracic Echocardiographic Examination in Adults: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32:1-64.
24. 24. Kadappu KK, Thomas L. Tissue Doppler imaging in echocardiography: value and limitations. Heart Lung Circ 2015;24:224-33.
25. 25. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, 3rd, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016;29:277-314.
26. 26. Sharp AS, Tapp RJ, Thom SA, Francis DP, Hughes AD, Stanton AV, et al. Tissue Doppler E/E' ratio is a powerful predictor of primary cardiac events in a hypertensive population: an ASCOT substudy. Eur Heart J 2010;31:747-52.
27. 27. Choi JS, Oh SJ, Oh S. Combined impact of elevated arterial stiffness and left ventricular filling pressure on outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;17:248.
28. 28. Dincer I, Kumbasar D, Nergisoglu G, Atmaca Y, Kutlay S, Akyurek O, et al. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with doppler tissue imaging: effects of preload and place of measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:155-60.
29. 29. Pelà G, Regolisti G, Coghi P, Cabassi A, Basile A, Cavatorta A, et al. Effects of the reduction of preload on left and right ventricular myocardial velocities analyzed by Doppler tissue echocardiography in healthy subjects. Eur J Echocardiogr 2004;5:262-71.
30. 30. Chinali M, Aurigemma GP, de Simone G, Mishra RK, Gerdts E, Wachtell K, et al. Mitral E wave deceleration time to peak E velocity ratio and cardiovascular outcome in hypertensive patients during antihypertensive treatment (from the LIFE echo-substudy). Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1098-104.
31. 31. Torbicki A, Tramarin R, Fracchia C, Mortara A, Ambrosino N, Pozzoli M, et al. Effect of increased right ventricular preload on pulmonary artery flow velocity pattern in patients with normal or increased pulmonary artery pressure. Am J Noninvasive Cardiol 1994;8:151-5.