Does health literacy affect the decision to have gestational diabetes screening test?
Abstract
Objectives: The main objective of this study is to assess the relationship between the level of Health Literacy and the patient's decision to refuse the Gestational diabetes mellitus screening test.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a high-volume public hospital from March 2020 to September 2020 with women between 24-28 weeks of gestation. Demographic characteristics and gestational diabetes mellitus screening status were recorded for each woman. The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire was used to assess health literacy.
Results: A total of 364 women were included in the study. Two hundred and three (55.7%) women accepted the gestational diabetes mellitus screening test, and 44.2% did not. Health care, disease prevention, health promotion subscales, and the general scale scores were higher in the gestational diabetes mellitus screening group (p = 0.001, p = 0.024, p = 0.01, and p = 0.003, respectively). It was determined that a 1-point increase in the health care score decreased the probability of rejecting the gestational diabetes mellitus screening by 1.03 times (p = 0.003).
Conclusions: Lower health literacy levels were associated with higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus screening test rejection.
Keywords
References
- 1. Saravanan P; Diabetes in Pregnancy Working Group; Maternal Medicine Clinical Study Group; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, UK. Gestational diabetes: opportunities for improving maternal and child health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(9):793-800. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30161-3.
- 2. Deputy NP, Kim SY, Conrey EJ, Bullard KM. Prevalence and Changes in Preexisting Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes Among Women Who Had a Live Birth - United States, 2012-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(43):1201-1207. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6743a2.
- 3. Karaçam Z, Çelİk D. The prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Turkey: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(8):1331-1341. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1635109.
- 4. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Antoniou G, Baghurst P, Robinson JS. Screening for gestational diabetes: the effect of varying blood glucose definitions in the prediction of adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47(4):307-312. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00743.x.
- 5. Scholtens DM, Kuang A, Lowe LP, et al. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS): Maternal Glycemia and Childhood Glucose Metabolism. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):381-392. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2021.
- 6. Carolan-Olah M, Vasilevski V. Development and validation of the 'Knowledge of Gestational Diabetes (GDM)' questionnaire among a sample of women with GDM in Australia. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(8):2112-2118. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.029.
- 7. Hillier TA, Pedula KL, Ogasawara KK, et al. A Pragmatic, Randomized Clinical Trial of Gestational Diabetes Screening. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(10):895-904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026028.
- 8. Caughey AB. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:E17-31.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Zeliha Atak
0000-0002-4876-0573
Türkiye
Hatice Ortaç
0000-0002-1199-1706
Türkiye
Gökhan Ocakoğlu
0000-0002-1114-6051
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
September 11, 2023
Publication Date
March 4, 2024
Submission Date
May 2, 2023
Acceptance Date
July 29, 2023
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 10 Number: 2