Evaluation of mercury in skin lightening creams commonly used in Trinidad and Tobago and their associated health risk

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the presence of mercury in commonly used over the counter skin-lightening creams available in Trinidad and Tobago. The objective of this study was to evaluate if skin-lightening creams commonly used in Trinidad and Tobago contained Mercury, and establish the health risks presented by these products.

Methods: Nineteen skin-lightening creams were analysed using Cold Capor Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (CV-AAS). Margin of Safety (MoS) and Hazard Quotient (HQ) calculations were used to assess risk to users.

Results: Of the nineteen creams assessed, sixteen contained high concentrations of mercury (0.294-14414.5 µg/g), only three creams had no mercury detected. 9 of the 19 samples contained levels of mercury that exceed the Minamata convention’s accepted limit of 1µg/g, with 3 samples exceeding 3800.000 µg/g. Risk assessments using MoS and HQ showed that 3 of the samples were unsafe for use and are considered hazardous. The study also revealed that many creams do contain mercury even if it did not constitute part of the product formulation.

Conclusions: The data infers that some manufacturers do add mercury to their formulations while others are the victims of contaminated raw materials. MoS and HQ show that 21% of the samples were unsafe and 16% can be considered hazardous for human use. It is possible that with such levels of mercury in these products and the popularity of these products within the Caribbean Community and its diaspora, that there exists a significant amount of members with higher than acceptable mercury levels, with undiagnosed clinical symptoms.

Keywords

• Mercury
• mercury toxicity
• skin lightening
• skin whitening
• skin brightening
• bleaching
• consumer safety
• risk assessment
• spectrophotometry

References

1. 1. Adetoogun JI, Aderinto N, Ashimi AA, Akano DF, Ogundipe TO, Fikayomi PB. Practice and motivations for skin bleaching among Africans. Int J Surg. 2023;109(2):218-219. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000141.
2. 2. Daftary K, Krishnam NS, Kundu RV. Uncovering the roots of skin bleaching: colorism and its detrimental effects. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(1):337-338. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15049.
3. 3. Dhillon-Jamerson KK. Key concepts in advertising: colorism. Advertising & Society Quarterly. 2022;23(1).
4. 4. Peltzer K, Pengpid S, James C. The globalization of whitening: prevalence of skin lighteners (or bleachers) use and its social correlates among university students in 26 countries. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55(2):165-172. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12860.
5. 5. Wone I, Ngom NB, Leye MN, Fall F, Timera B, Ly F. Prevalence of skin bleaching cosmetics use in Senegal: trends and action prospects. Cent Afr J Pub Health. 2022;8(5):198-202. doi: 10.11648/j.cajph.20220805.12.
6. 6. Wade TJ, Romano MJ, Blue L. The effect of African American skin color on hiring preferences. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34(12):2550-2558. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01991.x.
7. 7. Kelly MD. Racial inequality in the Anglophone Caribbean: comparing the cases of Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago. J Ethn Mig Stud. 2023;49(5):1125-1153. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2022.2044767
8. 8. Baugh C. Vybz Kartel’s Wife Tanesha ‘Shorty’ Johnson Launches ‘Skin Bleaching’ Products. Dancehallmag; 2021.

9. 9. Becker CG, Becker EL, Maher JF, Schreiner GE. Nephrotic syndrome after contact with mercury. A report of five cases, three after the use of ammoniated mercury ointment. Arch Intern Med. 1962;110:1781-86. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1962.03620200038008.
10. 10. Lundgren KD, Swensson A. Occupational poisoning by alkyl mercury compounds. J Ind Hyg Toxicol. 1949;31(4):190-200.
11. 11. Gaul LE, Underwood GB. Epidermal and dermal sensitization from mercury; its effect on vision and nail growth. J Indiana State Med Assoc. 1949;42(12):1258.
12. 12. Lerner AB. Effect of ions on melanin formation. J Invest Dermatol. 1952;18(1):47-52. doi: 10.1038/jid.1952.6.
13. 13. Ricketts P, Knight C, Gordon A, Boischio A, Voutchkov M. Mercury exposure associated with use of skin lightening products in Jamaica. J Health Pollut. 2020;10(26):200601. doi: 10.5696/2156-9614-10.26.200601.
14. 14. Hamann CR, Boonchai W, Wen L, et al. Spectrometric analysis of mercury content in 549 skin-lightening products: is mercury toxicity a hidden global health hazard? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(2):281-287.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.050.
15. 15. Park JD, Zheng W. Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury. J Prev Med Public Health. 2012;45(6):344-352. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.6.344.
16. 16. Mohammed T, Mohammed E, Bascombe S. The evaluation of total mercury and arsenic in skin bleaching creams commonly used in Trinidad and Tobago and their potential risk to the people of the Caribbean. J Public Health Res. 2017;6(3):1097. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2017.1097.
17. 17. McNutt M. Mercury and health. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2013: p. 1430.
18. 18. Maqbool F, Niaz K, Hassan FI, Khan F, Abdollahi M. Immunotoxicity of mercury: Pathological and toxicological effects. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2017;35(1):29-46. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2016.1278299.
19. 19. Risher JF, De Rosa CT. Inorganic: the other mercury. J Environ Health. 2007;70(4):9-16.
20. 20. Al-Saleh I. Potential health consequences of applying mercury-containing skin-lightening creams during pregnancy and lactation periods. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016;219(4-5):468-474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.03.002.
21. 21. Senthilingam M. Mother loses peripheral vision from apparent exposure to mercury in beauty creams. Toxic levels in her home put family at risk, say experts https://edition.cnn.com/: CNN; 2022 [Available from: www.cnn.com/2022/11/29/health/skin-whitening-beauty-creams-mercury-vision-loss-mother-families-as-equals-intl-cmd/index.html.
22. 22. Bastiansz A, Ewald J, Rodríguez Saldaña V, Santa-Rios A, Basu N. A systematic review of mercury exposures from skin-lightening products. Environ Health Perspect. 2022;130(11):116002. doi: 10.1289/EHP10808.
23. 23. WHO. Preventing disease through healthy environments: Mercury in skin lightening products. World Health Organization; 2019.
24. 24. Safety CP. Guidance on Heavy Metal Impurities in Cosmetics. modified 2016-02-29. Available from: http://www. hcsc. gc. ca/cps-spc/pubs/indust.
25. 25. USFDA. Prohibited and Restricted Ingredients in Cosmetics: UDSFDA; 2010. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/prohibited-restricted-ingredients-cosmetics.
26. 26. Maharaj D, Mohammed T, Mohammed A, Addison L. Enhanced digestion of complex cosmetic matrices for analysis of As, Hg, Cd, Cr, Ni, and Pb using triton X-100. MethodsX. 2021;8:101241. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101241.
27. 27. Mohammed E, Mohammed T, Mohammed A. Optimization of instrument conditions for the analysis for mercury, arsenic, antimony and selenium by atomic absorption spectroscopy. MethodsX. 2018;5:824-833. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.07.016.
28. 28. Abbas HH, Sakakibara M, Sera K, Andayanie E. Mercury exposure and health problems of the students using skin-lightening cosmetic products in Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Cosmetics. 2020;7(3):58. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics7030058.
29. 29. The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. The SCCS's Notes of Guidance for the testing of Cosmetic Substance and their Safety Evaluation 10th Revision Europe2018 [updated 24th-25th October, 2018. 1-152]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_224.pdf.
30. 30. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume 1: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment) 2004. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/.
31. 31. Arshad H, Mehmood MZ, Shah MH, Abbasi AM. Evaluation of heavy metals in cosmetic products and their health risk assessment. Saudi Pharm J. 2020;28(7):779-790. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.05.006.
32. 32. Meng Y, Li Y, Zheng N, et al. Potential health risks of metals in skin care products used by Chinese consumers aged 19-29 years. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;216:112184. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112184.
33. 33. Ho YB, Abdullah NH, Hamsan H, Tan ESS. Mercury contamination in facial skin lightening creams and its health risks to user. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;88:72-76. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.05.018.
34. 34. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Sustainable Futures/P2 Framwork Manual 2012 Section 13: Quantitative Risk Assessment Calculations United States 2021 [updated 2021]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sustainable-futures/sustainable-futures-p2-framework-manual.
35. 35. Liu Y, Stowe MH, Bello D, et al. Skin exposure to aliphatic polyisocyanates in the auto body repair and refinishing industry: III. A personal exposure algorithm. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009;53(1):33-40. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men070.
36. 36. Emergency USEPAOo, Response R. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: pt. A. Human health evaluation manual: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US Environmental Protection Agency; 1989.
37. 37. Long CC, Finlay AY. The finger-tip unit--a new practical measure. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1991;16(6):444-447. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1991.tb01232.x.
38. 38. Podgórska A, Puścion-Jakubik A, Grodzka A, Naliwajko SK, Markiewicz-Żukowska R, Socha K. Natural and conventional cosmetics - mercury exposure assessment. Molecules. 2021;26(13):4088. doi: 10.3390/molecules26134088.
39. 39. Pramanik S, Kumar M, Qureshi A. Mercury in skin-care products in India and consumer exposure risks. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021;121:104870. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104870.
40. 40. Gnonsoro UP, Ake Assi YED, Sangare NS, Kouakou YU, Trokourey A. Health risk assessment of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg) in hydroalcoholic gels of Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022;200(5):2510-2518. doi: 10.1007/s12011-021-02822-y.
41. 41. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease. Calculating Hazard Quotients and Cancer Risk Estimates 2023. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pha-guidance/conducting_scientific_evaluations/epcs_and_exposure_calculations/hazardquotients_cancerrisk.html#.
42. 42. Chan TY. Inorganic mercury poisoning associated with skin-lightening cosmetic products. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011;49(10):886-891. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2011.626425.
43. 43. Ori MR, Larsen JB, Shirazi FM. Mercury poisoning in a toddler from home contamination due to skin-lightening cream. J Pediatr. 2018;196:314-317.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.023.
44. 44. Rai S, Gupta A, Punetha V. Regulations of Cosmetics Across the Globe. Appl Clin Res Clin Trials Regul Aff. 2015;2(3):137-144. doi: 10.2174/2213476X03666151125220117
45. 45.Brodziak-Dopierała B, Fischer A, Chrzanowska M, Ahnert B. Mercury exposure from the consumption of dietary supplements containing vegetable, cod liver, and shark liver oils. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):2129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032129.
46. 46. Fernandes Azevedo B, Barros Furieri L, Peçanha FM, et al. Toxic effects of mercury on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:949048. doi: 10.1155/2012/949048.
47. 47. Peregrino CP, Moreno MV, Miranda SV, Rubio AD, Leal LO. Mercury levels in locally manufactured Mexican skin-lightening creams. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jun;8(6):2516-2523. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8062516.
48. 48. Prevodnik A, Willcox A, Lymberidi-Settimo E, Bender M, Lane O. Mercury-added skin-lightening creams: available, inexpensive and toxic. European Enviromental Bureau, Zero Mercury Working Group. Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
49. 49. Majeed T, Shah SH, Anjum I. Estimation of mercury and hydroquinone content in skin whitening creams and the potential risks to the health of women in Lahore, Pakistan. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2021;31(1):33-41.
50. 50. Sin KW, Tsang HF. Large-scale mercury exposure due to a cream cosmetic: community-wide case series. Hong Kong Med J. 2003 Oct;9(5):329-334.
51. 51. Dwijayanti E, Susanti S. Analysis of mercury (Hg) in whitening cream distributed in Palu City by atomic absorption spectroscopy. J Appl Chem Sci. 2018;5(1):430-433. doi: 10.35508/jacs.v5i1.1751
52. 52. Calderwood B. Anal bleaching is all the rage. The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide. 2008;15(4):17-18.