Comparison of manual lymphatic drainage massage and negative pressure massage therapy efficacy in lymphedema patients: a randomized controlled study
Abstract
Objectives: Lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes is a lifelong complication that can be encountered. Its treatment is essential, because it has significant impact on quality of life and daily living activities related to lower extremity involvement. This research aims to compare the effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage Massage (MLD) and Negative Pressure Massage Therapy (NPMT) treatments in order to provide maximum benefit to patients.
Methods: This prospective, randomized study included 30 patients with lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes. Patients, randomized using computer software, were divided into two groups. The first group (n =15) received 45 minutes, 15 sessions of MLD, while the second group (n =15) received 45 minutes of 15 sessions of NPMT using the LymphaTouch device. Compression bandaging was applied to both groups and self-drainage training was given to all patients. The circumference of the extremity at 6 reference points were measured and their pain and discomfort assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recorded before and after treatment. Changes within the groups and between the groups were compared using the SPSS statistical program.
Results: Statistically significant improvement was observed in all parameters in both treatment groups. The decrease in VAS pain and VAS discomfort scores (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; respectively), circumference measurement of the extremity (p < 0.01) was statistically greater in the NPMT group compared to the MLD group.
Conclusions: In conclusion, NPMT appears to be a beneficial non-invasive treatment method for reducing extremity volumes and decreasing subjective pain and discomfort in lymphedema patients.
Keywords
References
- 1. Korpan MI, Crevenna R, Fialka-Moser V. Lymphedema: a therapeutic approach in the treatment and rehabilitation of cancer patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90(5 Suppl 1):S69-75.
- 2. Miller AJ, Bruna J, Beninson J. A universally applicable clinical classification of lymphedema. Angiology 1999;50:189-92.
- 3. Cheville AL, McGarvey CL, Petrek JA, Russo SA, Thiadens SR, Taylor ME. The grading of lymphedema in oncology clinical trials. Semin Radiat Oncol 2003;13:214-25.
- 4. Paskett ED, Dean JA, Oliveri JM, Harrop JP. Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:3726-33.
- 5. International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. 2009 Concensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 2009;42:51-60.
- 6. Badger C, Preston N, Seers K, Mortimer P. Benzo-pyrones for reducing and controlling lymphoedema of the limbs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2004:CD003140.
- 7. Maclellan RA, Greene AK. Lymphedema. Semin Pediatr Surg 2014;23:191-7.
- 8. Kesiktaş FN. Kanser rehabilitasyonunda fiziksel ajanlar ve uğraşı tedavisi. Akyüz G, Giray E, eds. Kanser Rehabilitasyonu. 1st. edition. Ankara, Türkiye Klinikleri; 2022: pp. 66-73.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Rehabilitation
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Sedef Ersoy
*
0000-0001-9018-7937
Türkiye
Nur Kesiktaş
0000-0002-3937-9973
Türkiye
Büşra Şirin
0000-0001-8519-1747
Türkiye
Halime Kibar
0000-0002-9695-062X
Türkiye
Nurdan Paker
0000-0001-8957-1843
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
October 16, 2023
Publication Date
November 4, 2023
Submission Date
September 4, 2023
Acceptance Date
October 6, 2023
Published in Issue
Year 2023 Volume: 9 Number: 6
Cited By
Soft Robotic Devices for Mechanotherapy of the Upper and Lower Extremities
Advanced Materials Technologies
https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202401530