Research Article

Determining the awareness of surgical nurses regarding frail patients: a cross-sectional study

Volume: 10 Number: 4 July 4, 2024
EN

Determining the awareness of surgical nurses regarding frail patients: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the knowledge level and awareness of surgical nurses about fragile patients.

Method: Obtained through Introductory Information Survey Form created by the researchers and Fragile Patient Information Evaluation Form methods.

Results: The average age of the surgical nurses participating in the study was 28±5.01 years, the average professional experience was 5±5.09 years, and the average experience in the service they worked in was 3±2.83 years. The rate of those who heard the term 'frailty' for the first time is 63%. It was stated that 92.7% of the 110 surgical nurses participating in the study did not receive any training on fragility; It was stated that 50.9% of them think of the most vulnerable and weak patient when they think of a fragile patient. While 50% of them stated that when they suspected frailty in the patient, they evaluated involuntary weight loss, slowness (slowness in walking, muscle weakness), and fatigue; 70% stated that the biggest risk factor for frailty is being depressed or using antidepressant medication.

Conclusions: According to the results of the study, it can be said that the awareness of surgical nurses about the "fragile patient" should be increased. In the light of the data obtained, it can be suggested to organize trainings on "fragile patients" for surgical nurses. 'Fragile patient' education should be included in pre-graduation education and in-service training.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Terkeş N, Bektaş H. [Elderly health and technology use]. E-Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty. 2016;9(4):153-159. [Article in Turkish]
  2. 2. Elixhauser A, Andrews RM. Profile of inpatient operating room procedures in US hospitals in 2007. Arch Surg. 2010;145(12):1201-1208. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.269.
  3. 3. Yaman H, Yaman A. [Frailty in Family Medicine: Diagnosis and Management]. Ankara Med J. 2015;15(2):89-95. doi.org/10.17098/amj.60105. [Article in Turkish]
  4. 4. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146-M156. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
  5. 5. Barreto Pde S, Greig C, Ferrandez AM. Detecting and categorizing frailty status in older adults using a self-report screening instrument. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;54(3):e249-254. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.08.003.
  6. 6. Savaş S, Akçiçek F. [Comprehensive geriatric assessment]. Ege J Med. 2010;49(3 Suppl.):19-30. [Article in Turkish]
  7. 7. Sonel Tur B. [Is Osteoarthritis an Inevitable Concequence of Aging?] Turkiye Klinikleri Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation-Special Topics. 2008;1(2):7-10. [Article in Turkish]
  8. 8. Kapucu S, Ünver G. [Fragile Elderly and Nursing Care]. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 2017;39(1):122-129. doi: 10.20515/otd.288967. [Article in Turkish]

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration , Health Services and Systems (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

March 20, 2024

Publication Date

July 4, 2024

Submission Date

December 1, 2023

Acceptance Date

February 8, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 10 Number: 4

AMA
1.Öztaş İ, Yava A, Çelik B. Determining the awareness of surgical nurses regarding frail patients: a cross-sectional study. Eur Res J. 2024;10(4):398-404. doi:10.18621/eurj.1398799