Can first trimester vitamin D levels predict adverse maternal outcomes in patients who do not take vitamin D supplements?
Abstract
Objectives: Vitamin D deficiency is claimed to be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Here, we aimed to compare adverse maternal outcomes according to vitamin D levels and determine the predictive role of first-trimester vitamin D for adverse maternal outcomes in patients not receiving vitamin D supplementation.
Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective study. A total of 232 patients were divided into three groups: vitamin D deficient (n=127), vitamin D insufficient (n=57), and vitamin D sufficient group (n=48). Then, the vitamin D deficiency group was divided into severe (n=72) and mild (n=55) vitamin D deficiency. Sociodemographic characteristics, first-trimester vitamin D levels, and adverse maternal outcomes such as gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and intrauterine growth restriction were compared between the groups. The predictive role of first-trimester vitamin D levels for adverse maternal outcomes was evaluated by ROC analysis.
Results: Gestational diabetes was more common in the vitamin D deficient group than in the vitamin D insufficient group (P=0.024). However, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and composite adverse outcomes were more common in the vitamin D deficient group than in the vitamin D sufficient group (P=0.044, P=0.008, and P=0.023, respectively). There was no difference in maternal outcomes between the mild and severe vitamin D deficiency groups. First-trimester vitamin D levels ≤19 ng/mL predicted adverse outcomes with 73.2% sensitivity and 49.2% specificity (AUC=0.630, P=0.006).
Conclusions: We recommend screening vitamin D levels in the first trimester, especially in high-risk groups, due to the increased incidence of adverse outcomes. We believe that more research is needed to clarify the relationship between vitamin D and adverse outcomes and the effect of supplementation on these outcomes.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Tahsin T, Khanam R, Chowdhury NH, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a nested case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05636-z.
- 2. Lee SB, Jung SH, Lee H, et al. Maternal vitamin D deficiency in early pregnancy and perinatal and long-term outcomes. Heliyon. 2023;22;9(9):e19367. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19367.
- 3. Díaz L, Noyola-Martínez N, Barrera D, et al. Calcitriol inhibits TNF-alpha-induced inflammatory cytokines in human trophoblasts. J Reprod Immunol. 2009;81(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2009.02.005.
- 4. Grundmann M, von Versen-Höynck F. Vitamin D - roles in women's reproductive health? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;2(9):146. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-146.
- 5. Shin JS, Choi MY, Longtine MS, Nelson DM. Vitamin D effects on pregnancy and the placenta. Placenta. 2010;31(12):1027-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.08.015.
- 6. Wei SQ, Qi HP, Luo ZC, Fraser WD. Maternal vitamin D status and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(9):889-99. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.765849.
- 7. Shand AW, Nassar N, Von Dadelszen P, Innis SM, Green TJ. Maternal vitamin D status in pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a group at high risk for pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2010;117(13):1593-1598. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02742.x.
- 8. Hyppönen E, Läärä E, Reunanen A, Järvelin MR, Virtanen SM. Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: a birth-cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358(9292):1500-1503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06580-1.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Burcu Dinçgez
*
0000-0002-2697-7501
Türkiye
Gülten Özgen
0000-0002-7888-7583
Türkiye
Levent Özgen
0000-0003-0070-2646
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
August 6, 2024
Publication Date
September 4, 2024
Submission Date
July 6, 2024
Acceptance Date
August 4, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2024 Volume: 10 Number: 5