Analysis of mortality and cost implications in aspiration pneumonia: A retrospective study
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the demographic factors, clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs associated with aspiration pneumonia, focusing on mortality rates and the economic burden on healthcare systems.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from patients admitted to the Emergency Department of Samsun Training and Research Hospital between January 2016 and December 2017 and followed in the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. The study recorded demographic-clinical parameters, nutritional methods, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, clinical outcomes, and cost situations for 60 patients.
Results: The average age of male patients was found to be higher than that of female patients, with a broader age range observed among men. The study identified significantly higher ICU stays and costs for deceased patients. The age group with the highest mortality rate was 66-80 years. Additionally, advanced nutritional support methods, such as enteral and parenteral nutrition, were associated with higher mortality rates.
Conclusions: Aspiration pneumonia represents a significant economic burden on healthcare systems, particularly for patients with poor outcomes. Age, ICU length of stay, and the need for advanced nutritional support are key factors influencing mortality. The findings underscore the need for multidisciplinary care approaches and early identification of high-risk patients to optimize treatment and resource allocation.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Yoshimatsu Y, Melgaard D, Westergren A, Skrubbeltrang C, Smithard DG. The diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia in older persons: a systematic review. Eur Geriatr Med. 2022;13(5):1071-1080. doi: 10.1007/s41999-022-00689-3.
- 2. Studer P, Räber G, Ott D, Candinas D, Schnüriger B. Risk factors for fatal outcome in surgical patients with postoperative aspiration pneumonia. Int J Surg. 2016;27:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.043.
- 3. Taylor JK, Fleming GB, Singanayagam A, Hill AT, Chalmers JD. Risk factors for aspiration in community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of a hospitalized UK cohort. Am J Med. 2013;126(11):995-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.07.012.
- 4. Langmore SE, Terpenning MS, Schork A, et al. Predictors of aspiration pneumonia: how important is dysphagia? Dysphagia. 1998;13(2):69-81. doi: 10.1007/PL00009559.
- 5. Johnson JL, Hirsch CS. Aspiration pneumonia. Recognizing and managing a potentially growing disorder. Postgrad Med. 2003;113(3):99-102, 105-106, 111-112. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2003.03.1390.
- 6. DiBardino DM, Wunderink RG. Aspiration pneumonia: a review of modern trends. J Crit Care. 2015;30(1):40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.07.011.
- 7. Yanagita Y, Arizono S, Tawara Y, et al. The severity of nutrition and pneumonia predicts survival in patients with aspiration pneumonia: A retrospective observational study. Clin Respir J. 2022;16(7):522-532. doi: 10.1111/crj.13521.
- 8. Finucane TE, Bynum JP. Use of tube feeding to prevent aspiration pneumonia. Lancet. 1996 Nov 23;348(9039):1421-1424. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03369-7. Erratum in: Lancet 1997;349(9048):364.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Emergency Medicine , Chest Diseases
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
February 16, 2025
Publication Date
May 4, 2025
Submission Date
September 11, 2024
Acceptance Date
October 21, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 3