Evaluation of bismuth shielding in reducing thyroid radiation dose during neck multidetector computed tomography examinations: a comparative study

Abstract

Objectives: This study pointed to assess the viability of bismuth protecting in lessening thyroid radiation measurements amid neck multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) examinations and to explore alternative protecting strategies which will moderate negative impacts on picture quality.

Methods: The study involved 20 patients undergoing neck MDCT. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were utilized to degree radiation measurements to the thyroid organ with and without bismuth protecting. Measurable investigations, counting combined tests t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, were conducted to evaluate the importance of dosage decrease.

Results: Bismuth protecting altogether diminished the radiation measurements to the thyroid organ by 43.95%, from 24.50 mGy to 17.59 mGy (P<0.01). The reduction was statistically significant in women (P<0.01) but not in men (P>0.05) due to the small sample size. No significant correlation was found between age and radiation dose levels (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Bismuth shielding effectively reduces thyroid radiation dose during neck MDCT examinations. However, the potential increase in image noise necessitates careful management to maintain diagnostic accuracy. Further research is needed to optimize shielding techniques and explore alternative methods to minimize radiation exposure while preserving image quality.

Keywords

• Bismuth shielding
• thyroid radiation dose
• neck MDCT
• radiation protection

References

1. 1. Daşdağ S, Çelik S. [Determination of erythrocyte, plasma and total blood volume in lymphomas]. Thesis. Dicle University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Department of Biophysics, Diyarbakır, 2014. [Article in Turkish]
2. 2. Ali G, Cantez S. Pratik Nükleer Tıp. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Vakfı, Nobel Tıp Kitabevi. 1992.
3. 3. UNSCEAR 2008 Report Volume I. (https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2008_1.html). Accessed 26 June 2024.
4. 4. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim K-P, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071-2077. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440.
5. 5. Mehnati P, Malekzadeh R, Sooteh MY. Use of bismuth shield for protection of superficial radiosensitive organs in patients undergoing computed tomography: a literature review and meta-analysis. Radiol Phys Technol. 2019;12(1):6-25. doi: 10.1007/s12194-019-00500-2.
6. 6. Jalilifar M, Fatahi-Asl J, Saba V. Radiation protection to patients in radiology: a review study. Radioprotection. 2022;57(1):41-48. doi: 10.1051/radiopro/2021031.
7. 7. Lai CW-K, Cheung H-Y, Chan T-P, Wong TH. Reducing the radiation dose to the eye lens region during CT brain examination: the potential beneficial effect of the combined use of bolus and a bismuth shield. Radioprotection. 2015;50(3):195-201. doi: 10.1051/radiopro/2015003.
8. 8. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). AAPM Position Statements, Policies and Procedures - Details.

9. 9. Saba V, Shuraki JK, Valizadeh A, Zahedinia M, Barkhordari M. Reducing Absorbed Dose to Thyroid in Neck CT Examinations: The Effects of Saba Shielding. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020;191(3):349-360. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa153.
10. 10. NCRP. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of United States (1987). Bethesda, MD: 2018.
11. 11. Wiest PW, Locken JA, Heintz PH, Mettler FA Jr. CT scanning: a major source of radiation exposure. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2002;23(5):402-410. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2171(02)90011-9.
12. 12. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Rizzo S, Kanarek D, Shepard JA. Radiation exposure from chest CT: issues and strategies. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19(2):159-166. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.2.159.
13. 13. Golding SJ, Shrimpton PC. Commentary. Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? Br J Radiol. 2002;75(889):1-4. doi: 10.1259/bjr.75.889.750001.
14. 14. Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, et al. Survey of CT practice in the UK: part 2. Dosimetric aspects. Didcot, Oxon : NRPB, Great Britain: 1991: p.121.
15. 15. Mettler FA Jr, Briggs JE, Carchman R, Altobelli KK, Hart BL, Kelsey CA. Use of radiology in U.S. general short-term hospitals: 1980-1990. Radiology. 1993;189(2):377-380. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.2.8210363.
16. 16. Inkoom S, Papadakis AE, Raissaki M, et al. Paediatrıc Neck Multidetector Computed Tomography: The Effect of Bismuth Shieldıng on Thyroıd dose and Image Qualıty. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;173(4):361-373. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw007.