Impact of pre-stenting antiplatelet therapy regimens on clinical outcomes following carotid artery stenting: a retrospective analysis
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the influence of various antiplatelet regimens before carotid artery stenting (CAS) on short-term and long-term clinical outcomes. Effective antiplatelet therapy is vital for enhancing the success and safety of CAS. Determining the best approach remains a priority.
Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis involved 235 patients who underwent CAS at a single institution between October 2020 and October 2024. Participants were divided into three groups based on the antiplatelet regimen administered before the procedure: dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), aspirin monotherapy (SAPT-A), and clopidogrel monotherapy (SAPT-C). The main outcomes evaluated were stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and bleeding complications. Secondary outcomes included restenosis, stent thrombosis, and death. Statistical methods were applied to compare outcomes across the groups.
Results: Stroke (0.8%) and TIA (2.5%) were notably less frequent in the DAPT group compared to the SAPT-A (7.1% and 12.5%, respectively) and SAPT-C (6.9% and 8.6%, respectively) groups (P<0.05). Rates of stent thrombosis (1.7%-1.8%) and mortality (0.8%-3.4%) at six months showed no significant differences among the groups (P>0.05).
Conclusions: Pre-procedural DAPT reduces short-term ischemic complications in CAS. However, long-term outcomes were comparable across regimens. These findings suggest that antiplatelet strategies should be individualized. Larger studies with longer follow-ups are needed.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Wabnitz AM, Turan TN. Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Surgery, Stenting, or Medical Therapy? Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017;19(8):62. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0564-0.
- 2. Nicolaides AN, Kakkos SK, Griffin M, et al. Severity of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischaemic events: results from the ACSRS study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30(3):275-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.04.031.
- 3. Aichner FT, Topakian R, Alberts MJ, et al. High cardiovascular event rates in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: the REACH Registry. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(8):902-908. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02614.x.
- 4. Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Gates P, et al. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(23):1693-1700. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006083422302.
- 5. Marquardt L, Geraghty OC, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Low risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis on best medical treatment: a prospective, population-based study. Stroke. 2010;41(1):e11-17. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561837.
- 6. Kerber CW, Cromwell LD, Loehden OL. Catheter dilatation of proximal carotid stenosis during distal bifurcation endarterectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1980;1(4):348-349.
- 7. Theron JG, Payelle GG, Coskun O, Huet HF, Guimaraens L. Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology. 1996;201(3):627-636. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939208.
- 8. Helgason CM, Bolin KM, Hoff JA, et al. Development of aspirin resistance in persons with previous ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25(12):2331-2336. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.12.2331.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Cardiovascular Surgery
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Oguz Arslanturk
*
0000-0002-4047-9656
Türkiye
Mehmet Selim Gel
0000-0002-3678-5538
Türkiye
Emrah Keskin
0000-0001-5326-741X
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
February 7, 2025
Publication Date
March 4, 2025
Submission Date
December 20, 2024
Acceptance Date
January 31, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 2
Cited By
Bilateral Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Risk Factors and Prognosis
Medical Journal of Western Black Sea
https://doi.org/10.29058/mjwbs.1735975