Research Article

Which type of obesity benefits most from endoscopic intragastric balloon application?

Volume: 11 Number: 2 March 4, 2025
EN

Which type of obesity benefits most from endoscopic intragastric balloon application?

Abstract

Objectives: As obesity poses significant health risks, exploring minimally invasive treatments like intragastric balloons becomes crucial for enhanced accessibility and efficacy in managing this pervasive public health challenge. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Intragastric Balloon (IGB) application in weight reduction across various degrees of obesity, providing a comprehensive assessment of its efficacy.

Methods: A total of 187 patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 underwent IGB application and were categorized into three groups based on the degree of obesity. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess weight loss, excess weight loss, and BMI reduction, focusing on the impact of IGB therapy in different degrees of obesity.

Results: IGB application demonstrated significant efficacy in weight reduction across all degrees of obesity. Notably, the highest rates of excess weight loss were observed in patients with Class 1 obesity. Gender-specific analysis revealed variations in the response to IGB therapy, with females exhibiting higher success rates.

Conclusions: The findings of this study highlight the efficacy of IGB application in achieving weight loss, emphasizing its effectiveness across different degrees of obesity. The notable success in Class 1 obesity underscores the potential of IGB as an effective treatment modality.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committeeof Balıkesir University School of Medicine (Decision date: 22.11.2023 and no. 2023/179).

References

  1. 1. Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Sierra-Johnson J, et al. Accuracy of body mass index in diagnosing obesity in the adult general population. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(6):959-966. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.11.
  2. 2. Apovian CM. Obesity: definition, comorbidities, causes, and burden. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(7 Suppl):s176-85.
  3. 3. Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2019;92:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005.
  4. 4. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight fact sheet. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed September 10, 2023.
  5. 5. Cooper AJ, Gupta SR, Moustafa AF, Chao AM. Sex/Gender Differences in Obesity Prevalence, Comorbidities, and Treatment. Curr Obes Rep. 2021;10(4):458-466. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00453-x.
  6. 6. Müller TD, Blüher M. [Obesity treatment: will pharmacotherapies replace metabolic surgery in the future?]. Inn Med (Heidelb). 2023;64(7):629-635. doi: 10.1007/s00108-023-01530-0. [Article in German]
  7. 7. Orzano AJ, Scott JG. Diagnosis and treatment of obesity in adults: an applied evidence-based review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(5):359-369. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.17.5.359.
  8. 8. Kim SH, Chun HJ, Choi HS, Kim ES, Keum B, Jeen YT. Current status of intragastric balloon for obesity treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(24):5495-5504. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i24.5495.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

General Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

February 22, 2025

Publication Date

March 4, 2025

Submission Date

January 27, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 12, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 2

AMA
1.Şahin AG, Alçı E. Which type of obesity benefits most from endoscopic intragastric balloon application? Eur Res J. 2025;11(2):412-419. doi:10.18621/eurj.1627917