Massive transfusion in obstetric hemorrhage: What are the risk factors and can they be predicted?
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with massive transfusion in obstetric hemorrhage and evaluate their predictive value to facilitate early intervention and improve maternal outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1305 women who received blood transfusions for obstetric hemorrhage at Etlik City Hospital between October 2022 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who required massive transfusion (≥10 units of blood products) and those who received at least one unit of transfusion. Demographic, clinical, obstetric, and hematological parameters were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U, and independent sample t-tests.
Results: A history of recurrent miscarriage, two or more previous cesarean sections, congenital uterine abnormalities, and uterine rupture were significantly associated with massive transfusion (P<0.01). Severe anemia (Hb<9 g/dL) and thrombocytopenia were also identified as critical hematological predictors (P<0.001). Socioeconomic factors, including low educational attainment and unemployment, were significantly correlated with the need for massive transfusion (P<0.001). Obstetric complications such as postpartum atony (P<0.001) and premature rupture of membranes (P=0.04) also contributed to increased transfusion risk.
Conclusions: Identifying key risk factors for massive transfusion can aid in early recognition and timely intervention for obstetric hemorrhage. Integrating these predictors into clinical protocols may enhance maternal care by improving preparedness and reducing maternal morbidity and mortality.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Hofmeyr GJ, Qureshi Z. Preventing deaths due to haemorrhage. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36:68-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.05.004.
- 2. Kogutt BK, Vaught AJ. Postpartum hemorrhage: Blood product management and massive transfusion. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(1):44-50. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.11.008.
- 3. Carroli G, Cuesta C, Abalos E, Gulmezoglu AM. Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(6):999-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.08.004.
- 4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Antepartum Haemorrhage (Green-top Guideline No. 63). 2011.
- 5. Pacagnella RC, Souza JP, Durocher J, et al. A systematic review of the relationship between blood loss and clinical signs. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057594.
- 6. Bonnar J. Massive obstetric haemorrhage. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(1):1-18. doi: 10.1053/beog.1999.0060.
- 7. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. World Health Organization; 2012.
- 8. Mhyre JM, Shilkrut A, Kuklina EV, et al. Massive Blood Transfusion During Hospitalization for Delivery in New York State, 1998-2007. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(6):1288-1294. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000021.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Gizem Aktemur
*
0000-0001-6824-881X
Türkiye
Şeyda Çalışkan
0000-0001-6525-8705
Türkiye
Gülşan Karabay
0000-0003-2567-2850
Türkiye
Engin Yurtçu
0000-0002-1517-3823
Türkiye
Koray Özbay
0000-0002-1640-3176
Türkiye
Yasin Ceylan
0000-0001-5517-8461
Türkiye
Şevki Çelen
0000-0001-7033-3474
Türkiye
Çağanay Soysal
0000-0002-4381-6099
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
February 25, 2025
Publication Date
March 4, 2025
Submission Date
February 6, 2025
Acceptance Date
February 21, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 2