Research Article

Massive transfusion in obstetric hemorrhage: What are the risk factors and can they be predicted?

Volume: 11 Number: 2 March 4, 2025
EN

Massive transfusion in obstetric hemorrhage: What are the risk factors and can they be predicted?

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with massive transfusion in obstetric hemorrhage and evaluate their predictive value to facilitate early intervention and improve maternal outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1305 women who received blood transfusions for obstetric hemorrhage at Etlik City Hospital between October 2022 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who required massive transfusion (≥10 units of blood products) and those who received at least one unit of transfusion. Demographic, clinical, obstetric, and hematological parameters were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U, and independent sample t-tests.

Results: A history of recurrent miscarriage, two or more previous cesarean sections, congenital uterine abnormalities, and uterine rupture were significantly associated with massive transfusion (P<0.01). Severe anemia (Hb<9 g/dL) and thrombocytopenia were also identified as critical hematological predictors (P<0.001). Socioeconomic factors, including low educational attainment and unemployment, were significantly correlated with the need for massive transfusion (P<0.001). Obstetric complications such as postpartum atony (P<0.001) and premature rupture of membranes (P=0.04) also contributed to increased transfusion risk.

Conclusions: Identifying key risk factors for massive transfusion can aid in early recognition and timely intervention for obstetric hemorrhage. Integrating these predictors into clinical protocols may enhance maternal care by improving preparedness and reducing maternal morbidity and mortality.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The Ankara Etlik City Hospital’s Ethics Committee gave its permission to the study protocol (approval number: AESH-BADEK-2024-1198). The Declaration of Helsinki’s guidelines were followed in the conduct of this study.

References

  1. 1. Hofmeyr GJ, Qureshi Z. Preventing deaths due to haemorrhage. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36:68-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.05.004.
  2. 2. Kogutt BK, Vaught AJ. Postpartum hemorrhage: Blood product management and massive transfusion. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(1):44-50. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.11.008.
  3. 3. Carroli G, Cuesta C, Abalos E, Gulmezoglu AM. Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(6):999-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.08.004.
  4. 4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Antepartum Haemorrhage (Green-top Guideline No. 63). 2011.
  5. 5. Pacagnella RC, Souza JP, Durocher J, et al. A systematic review of the relationship between blood loss and clinical signs. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057594.
  6. 6. Bonnar J. Massive obstetric haemorrhage. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(1):1-18. doi: 10.1053/beog.1999.0060.
  7. 7. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. World Health Organization; 2012.
  8. 8. Mhyre JM, Shilkrut A, Kuklina EV, et al. Massive Blood Transfusion During Hospitalization for Delivery in New York State, 1998-2007. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(6):1288-1294. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000021.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

February 25, 2025

Publication Date

March 4, 2025

Submission Date

February 6, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 21, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 2

AMA
1.Aktemur G, Çalışkan Ş, Karabay G, et al. Massive transfusion in obstetric hemorrhage: What are the risk factors and can they be predicted? Eur Res J. 2025;11(2):427-435. doi:10.18621/eurj.1634732