Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale in a General Population
Abstract
Objectives: This study examines the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (T-MHLS) in a general population sample. Mental health literacy (MHL) is essential for recognizing and addressing mental health disorders; however, limited knowledge in this area contributes to underreported cases and untreated conditions.
Methods: The study was conducted using face-to-face interviews, adapting the T-MHLS from the original MHLS. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted to validate the structure of the scale. The sample size and data collection method ensured robust data, while validity and reliability analyses followed established psychometric protocols.
Results: Data were collected from 401 participants, and items with low factor loadings were removed, resulting in a final five-factor structure with 30 items, explaining 58.7% of the variance. Known-group validity analysis revealed that factors such as gender, marital status, education level, income perception, and personal or familial experiences with mental illness significantly influenced MHL scores. The Cronbach's alpha for the final scale was 0.861.
Conclusions: The T-MHLS is shown to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing mental health literacy in Turkey. This scale is recommended for use in future studies involving various demographic groups to effectively measure MHL levels.
Keywords
References
- 1. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2.
- 2. Wei Y, McGrath PJ, Hayden J, Kutcher S. Mental health literacy measures evaluating knowledge, attitudes and help-seeking: a scoping review. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:291. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0681-9.
- 3. Mezuk B, Eaton WW, Albrecht S, Golden SH. Depression and type 2 diabetes over the lifespan: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2383-2390. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0985.
- 4. Rugulies R. Depression as a predictor for coronary heart disease. a review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(1):51-61. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00439-7.
- 5. Lancet Global Mental Health Group; Chisholm D, Flisher AJ, Lund C, Patel V, Saxena S, Thornicroft G, Tomlinson M. Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for action. Lancet. 2007 6;370(9594):1241-1252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61242-2.
- 6. Wittchen HU, Jacobi F. Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe--a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;15(4):357-376. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.012.
- 7. Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-113.
- 8. Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, Christensen H, Rodgers B, Pollitt P. "Mental health literacy": a survey of the public's ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Med J Aust. 1997;166(4):182-186. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb140071.x.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Public Health (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
October 1, 2025
Publication Date
March 1, 2026
Submission Date
July 19, 2025
Acceptance Date
August 30, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 12 Number: 3