Comparison of clinical outcomes of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair techniques in inguinal hernia surgery
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of open surgery (Lichtenstein procedure) with laparoscopic surgery (Totally Extraperitoneal Repair - TEP) for inguinal hernia repair. The duration of the procedure, postoperative pain, and occurrence of complications were evaluated.
Methods: A retrospective research including 95 male patients was carried out from June 2023 to January 2025. Patients were classified into Lichtenstein (n=50) and TEP (n=45) groups. Demographic data, operational durations, postoperative pain evaluations (visual analog scale - VAS), return-to-work intervals, and complications were analyzed for comparison.
Results: The operating duration was diminished in the TEP group, with 24±3.1 minutes for unilateral patients and 37±4.2 minutes for bilateral cases, in contrast to 46±5.3 minutes and 72±8.0 minutes in the Lichtenstein group, respectively. Postoperative pain scores were significantly decreased in the TEP group at all time intervals. The recurrence rates were low in both cohorts, recorded at 2.0% for the Lichtenstein group and 2.2% for the TEP group. The complication rates were similar, with wound infection occurring in 6% and hematoma in 4% of the Lichtenstein group, whereas seroma was noted in 4.4% of the TEP group.
Conclusions: The laparoscopic TEP technique surpasses open surgery in terms of operating length and postoperative pain; yet, both methods are safe therapeutic options with low complication and recurrence rates.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Vallipriya V, Surendran S. Comparison of outcome between laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and open inguinal hernia repair. Int Surg J. 2022;9(6):1231-1235. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20221335.
- 2. Burton V, Perez AJ. Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Mini-invasive Surg. 2021;5:26. doi: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.26.
- 3. Pulikkal Reghunandanan R, Ali Usman A, Basheer S, Kuttichi L, Els Jojo J, Abdul Rasheed MF. Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Comparative Study. Cureus, 2023;15(11):e48619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48619.
- 4. Bind RK, Ram B, Singh U. Direct Inguinal Hernias and Anterior Surgical Approach are risk factors for female Inguinal Hernia Recurrences. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res. 2024;13(9):97-101. doi: 10.69605/ijlbpr_13.9.2024.16.
- 5. Shah MY, Raut P, Wilkinson TRV, Agrawal V. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein tension-free open mesh inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(26):e29746. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029746.
- 6. Zhao Y, Xu Z, Wang T, et al. The impact of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair for inguinal hernia treatment: A retrospective cohort study. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1194.
- 7. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
- 8. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain, 1997;72(1-2):95-97. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00005-5.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
General Surgery
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Süleyman Kargın
0000-0003-4597-8654
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
September 1, 2025
Publication Date
September 4, 2025
Submission Date
July 27, 2025
Acceptance Date
August 31, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 5