The Role of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Severe Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Objectives: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality and often leads to severe aortic stenosis (AS) at a younger age compared to tricuspid valves. Inflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of AS. This study aimed to investigate the association between the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and disease severity in patients with severe BAV-AS.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 76 patients with severe BAV-AS and 76 age- and sex-matched controls without AS were included. Routine laboratory data and transthoracic echocardiographic parameters were recorded. SII was calculated as platelet count × neutrophil count / lymphocyte count. The severity of AS was determined by aortic valve area (AVA) and mean transvalvular gradient. Correlation analyses, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between SII and AS severity.
Results: The BAV-AS group had significantly higher SII values compared to controls (median: 931.7 vs. 534; P<0.001). SII showed a moderate inverse correlation with AVA (r = –0.547) and a positive correlation with mean gradient (r=0.535). The optimal SII cut-off for predicting severe BAV-AS was 691 (AUC=0.790), with sensitivity of 71.1% and specificity of 77.6%. Multivariate analysis identified SII as an independent predictor of severe BAV-AS (OR: 3.841, 95% CI: 1.395-10.576; P=0.009).
Conclusions: SII is significantly elevated in patients with severe BAV-AS and may serve as a useful inflammatory biomarker for disease burden. Further studies are needed to confirm its utility in clinical decision-making.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(12):1890-900. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01886-7.
- 2. Tzemos N, Therrien J, Yip J, et al. Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1317-1325. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.11.1317.
- 3. Siu SC, Silversides CK. Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2789-2800. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.068.
- 4. Michelena HI, Desjardins VA, Avierinos JF, et al. Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community. Circulation. 2008;117(21):2776-2784. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740878.
- 5. Pawade TA, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Calcification in Aortic Stenosis: The Skeleton Key. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(5):561-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.066.
- 6. Yutzey KE, Demer LL, Body SC, et al. Calcific aortic valve disease: a consensus summary from the Alliance of Investigators on Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(11):2387-2393. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.302523.
- 7. Freeman RV, Otto CM. Spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease: pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies. Circulation. 2005;111(24):3316-3326. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.486738.
- 8. Yetkin E, Waltenberger J. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2009;135(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.03.108.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Haematology , Cardiology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Hakan Süygün
*
0000-0001-8997-9240
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
November 24, 2025
Publication Date
January 4, 2026
Submission Date
August 5, 2025
Acceptance Date
October 10, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 12 Number: 1