The Predictability of Anatomical Self-Efficacy Perception Levels of Associate Degree Students in Academic Performance

Erdal Horata; Gülay Madan

doi:10.18621/eurj.1784931

The Predictability of Anatomical Self-Efficacy Perception Levels of Associate Degree Students in Academic Performance

Abstract

Objectives: Anatomy education is a fundamental component of health education and professional competence. Anatomical self-efficacy is defined as the belief in one's ability to successfully complete anatomy instruction. This study aimed to examine the difference in anatomical self-efficacy perception score over a semester and assess its impact on predicting the academic performance of associate degree students enrolled in gross anatomy courses.

Methods: The demographic data of the students were collected. The “Self-efficacy Perception Scale for the Human Anatomy Course” was administered twice before the mid-term and final exams during the semester. As an academic performance, the mid-term and final exam grades were retrieved from the e-campus information system. Differences in exam grades and anatomical self-efficacy perception were analyzed using a t-test, while the effect of anatomical self-efficacy perception on exam grades was assessed through simple linear regression analysis.

Results: The mid-term (P<0.001) and final exam grades (P<0.001), and anatomical self-efficacy perception increased significantly (P<0.001). A simple linear regression analysis showed that both midterm (P<0.001) and final exam grades (P<0.001) were predicted by anatomical self-efficacy perception, suggesting that higher self-efficacy perception is associated with better academic performance.

Conclusions: To enhance academic performance, lecturers should organize training activities designed to increase anatomical self-efficacy.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 2023/11; date: 03.11.2023). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

1. Roddie IC. The Edinburgh Declaration. Lancet. 1988;2(8616):908. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92507-x.
2. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.
3. Klassen RM, Klassen JRL. Self-efficacy beliefs of medical students: a critical review. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(2):76-82. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0411-3.
4. Burgoon JM, Meece JL, Granger NA. Self-efficacy's influence on student academic achievement in the medical anatomy curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(5):249-255. doi: 10.1002/ase.1283.
5. Taşdemir R, Sivri İ, Güzelordu D, et al. Determination of nursing students’ self-efficacy belief levels in anatomy lectures. SHS Web Conf. 2016;31:01006. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20163101006.
6. Yildiz E, Colak T. The Effect of the Self-Efficiency Levels of University Students in Health Departments for the Anatomy Course on Exam Anxiety. Gevher Nesibe Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2022;7(21):81-90. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7389087.
7. HadaviBavili P, İlçioğlu K. Artwork in anatomy education: A way to improve undergraduate students' self-efficacy and attitude. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;17(1):66-76. doi: 10.1002/ase.2352.
8. Zheng B, Chang C, Lin CH, Zhang Y. Self-Efficacy, Academic Motivation, and Self-Regulation: How Do They Predict Academic Achievement for Medical Students? Med Sci Educ. 2020;31(1):125-130. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01143-4.

9. Vandenbossche V, Valcke M, Audenaert E, Willaert W. Anatomical knowledge enhancement through echocardiography and videos, with a spotlight on cognitive load, self-efficacy, and motivation. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;17(4):806-817. doi: 10.1002/ase.2398.
10. Bahçeci D. Anatomi dersinde portfolyo kullanmanın öğrencilerin bilişsel ve duyuşsal özellikleri üzerine etkisi [The effect of using portfolios in anatomy class on students' cognitive and affective characteristics]. PhD thesis. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü-Orta Öğretim Fen ve Matematik Alanlar Eğitimi, Ankara, 2006. [Article in Turkish]
11. Bahçeci D, Kuru M. Portfolyo Değerlendirmenin Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Öz-Yeterlik Algısı ve Yaşam Becerileri Üzerine Etkisi [The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on University Students’ Self Efficacy and Life Skills]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2008;9(1):97-111. [Article in Turkish].
12. George D, Mallery P. IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. 18th Ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2024.
13. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 6th Ed. London: Sage; 2013.
14. Langfield T, Colthorpe K, Ainscough L. Online instructional anatomy videos: Student usage, self-efficacy, and performance in upper limb regional anatomy assessment. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(5):461-470. doi: 10.1002/ase.1756.
15. Cavallo AML, Potter WH, Rozman M. Gender Differences in Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs, and Their Relationship to Course Achievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors. Sch. Sci. Math. 2004;104(6): 288-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18000.x.
16. Zimmerman BJ. Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):82-91. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.
17. Stankov L, Lee J. Quest for the best non-cognitive predictor of academic achievement. Educ. Psychol. 2014;34(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.858908.
18. Honicke T, Broadbent J. The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educ Res Rev. 2016;17:63-84. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002.
19. Acar D, Colak T, Colak S, et al. The Comparison of Self-Efficacy Belief Levels on Anatomy Education between the Undergraduate Students from Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department and the Associate Students from Vocational School of Health Services in Western Black Sea Region. J Educ Learn. 2017;6(3):151-156. doi: 10.5539/jel.v6n3p151.
20. Ferriby A, Schaefer AF. The Relationship Between Anatomical Self-efficacy and Feelings of Burnout in First-year Medical Students. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(2):437-446. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01511-2.
21. Reynolds K, Mueller S, Horn M. Predicting performance in a doctor of physical therapy gross anatomy course based on an exploratory factor analysis of the anatomical self-efficacy instrument. Anat Sci Educ. 2025;18(8):815-824. doi: 10.1002/ase.2488.
22. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen AP. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):678-688. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04284.x.
23. Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Read Writ Q. 2003;19(2):139-158. doi: 10.1080/10573560308222.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Anatomy

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Erdal Horata ^*
0000-0003-1359-228X
Türkiye

Gülay Madan
0000-0001-8959-4498
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

December 20, 2025

Publication Date

December 20, 2025

Submission Date

September 17, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 19, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Number: Advanced Online Publication

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1784931

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA94TZ85SP

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

AMA

1.Horata E, Madan G. The Predictability of Anatomical Self-Efficacy Perception Levels of Associate Degree Students in Academic Performance. Eur Res J. 2025;(Advanced Online Publication):1-8. doi:10.18621/eurj.1784931