Examining the Food and Nutrition Literacy Levels of Middle School-Aged Children
Abstract
Objectives: This cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the food and nutrition literacy levels of middle school children.
Methods: Data required for the study were collected online between January 22, 2025, and April 20, 2025. The study group consisted of middle school-aged children. Data were collected using an online survey method using the Socio-Demographic Data Collection Form and the Food and Nutrition Literacy Scale for Children (FNLSC) from 374 middle school-aged children who volunteered for parental consent and were selected using a non-probability sampling method. The statistical analysis of the data obtained in the study was carried out using SPSS 27.0 data analysis software, which employed the following methods: T-test, Oneway Anova, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Results: Of the middle school students participating in the study, 60.2% (n=225) were males and 39.8% (n=149) were female students, with a higher proportion of male students participating. The reliability coefficient of the food and nutrition literacy scale for children was found to be 0.55, while the harmful consumption subscale was 0.45, the packaging reading subscale was 0.50, the beneficial consumption subscale was 0.45, and the interaction subscale was 0.50. In examining food and nutrition literacy levels, significant differences were found within the subscale based on age, gender, grade, family, and nutritional status, but these differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05).
Conclusions: In the study examining the food and nutrition literacy levels of middle school children, no differences were found based on some variables. It is recommended that research be conducted to examine children's food and nutrition literacy levels by considering different factors.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Truman E, Raine K, Mrklas K, et al. Promoting children's health: Toward a consensus statement on food literacy. Can J Public Health. 2017;108(2):e211-e213. doi: 10.17269/CJPH.108.5909.
- 2. Vidgen HA, Gallegos D. Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite. 2014;76:50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010.
- 3. Zoellner J, Connell C, Bounds W, Crook L, Yadrick K. Nutrition literacy status and preferred nutrition communication channels among adults in the Lower Mississippi Delta. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6(4):A128.
- 4. WHO. Obesity and overweight. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.2024. Access Date: 28.09.2025.
- 5. Demiray G, Yorulmaz F. Halk Sağlığı Bakışıyla Obezite Yönetimi [Obesity Management with A Public Health Perspective]. Sağlık Bil Değer. 2023;13(1):147-155. doi: 10.33631/sabd.1101432. [Article in Turkish]
- 6. GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958-1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8.
- 7. Mollborn S, Lawrence E. Family, Peer, and School Influences on Children's Developing Health Lifestyles. J Health Soc Behav. 2018;59(1):133-150. doi: 10.1177/0022146517750637.
- 8. Brown JE, editor. Nutrition Through the Life Cycle. 8th edition. Cengage Learning, Inc., 2024.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Infant and Child Health , Paediatrics (Other) , Public Health (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Mehmet Zeki Avcı
0000-0001-6614-9447
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti
Seockhoon Chung
0000-0002-9798-3642
South Korea
Dilek Demir Kösem
0000-0001-9914-8299
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
January 31, 2026
Publication Date
January 31, 2026
Submission Date
November 6, 2025
Acceptance Date
January 28, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Number: Advanced Online Publication