Research Article

Occupational-related chemical ocular injuries: an analysis of 82 patients

Volume: 2 Number: 2 July 4, 2016
EN

Occupational-related chemical ocular injuries: an analysis of 82 patients

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate the  characteristics of occupational chemical eye injuries. Methods. Medical records of patients, who were registered to hospital officially as occupational chemical eye injuries between January 2010 and December 2013, were reviewed. The age, gender, injured eye, chemical agent, nature of the chemical, ocular findings, emerging complications and the information whether the patients knew the chemical agent causing the injury was recorded. Results. One hundred one eyes of 82 patients (2 women, 80 men) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 32.9±8.6 years (range: 19-59 years). Injury was bilateral in 19 patients. Chemical agents were not known by 53% of the patients. The most known agents were caustic agents (23%). Sulfuric acid (9%) and calcium hydroxide (4%) were other known chemical agents. The most common injury was superficial punctate epitheliopathy. Ten eyes of 9 patients had corneal edema. This injury was caused by acidic agents in 5 and alkaline agents in 3 patients. Corneoscleral perforation accompanied by chemical injury in one patient with car battery explosion. ConclusionsMost of the workers, who had eye injuries with chemicals, do not know the nature of chemical agent which caused the injury. Ocular morbidities may be decreased with the education of the workers about chemicals, working environment and protective measures. 

Keywords

References

  1. Chua D, Wong W, Lamoureux EL, Aung T, Saw SM, Wong TY. The prevalence and risk factors of ocular trauma: the Singapore Indian eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2011;18:281-7.
  2. Negrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries.. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998;5:143-69.
  3. Avsarogullari L, Sozuer E, Ikizceli I, Kekec Z, Yurumez Y, Ozkan S. Adult burn injuries in an Emergency Department in Central Anatolia, Turkey: a 5-year analysis. Burns 2003;29:571-7.
  4. National Safety Council. Injury Facts. USA:NSC Press, 2013.
  5. Canseven S, Turkoglu EB, Burcu A, Ornek F. [Outcomes of amniotic membrane transplantation in noninfectious ocular surface diseases]. MN Oftalmoloji 2011;18:176-80. [Article in Turkish]
  6. Kurnaz E, Kubaloglu A, Ozturk O. [Penetrating keratoplasty in treatment of nontraumatic corneal perforations]. Turk J Ophthalmol 2003;33:600-5. [Article in Turkish]
  7. Wagoner MD. Chemical injuries of the eye: current concepts in pathophysiology and therapy. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;41:275-313.
  8. Macdonald ECA, Cauchi PA, Azuara-Blanco A, Foot B. Surveillance of severe chemical corneal injuries in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1177-80.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Ophthalmology , Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Sertac Argun Kivanc
Department of Ophthalmology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa
Türkiye

Berna Akova Budak
Department of Ophthalmology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa
Türkiye

Sadik Gorkem Cevik
Department of Ophthalmology, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
Türkiye

Mehmet Baykara This is me
Department of Ophthalmology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa
Türkiye

Sefa Yasar This is me
Department of Ophthalmology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa
Türkiye

Ahmet Tuncer Ozmen This is me
Department of Ophthalmology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 4, 2016

Submission Date

September 29, 2015

Acceptance Date

February 29, 2016

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 2 Number: 2

AMA
1.Kivanc SA, Budak BA, Cevik SG, Baykara M, Yasar S, Ozmen AT. Occupational-related chemical ocular injuries: an analysis of 82 patients. Eur Res J. 2016;2(2):143-146. doi:10.18621/eurj.2016.5000144878

Cited By