Antibiotic prescription before and after rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for beta-hemolytic streptococci
Abstract
Objectives: Acute pharyngo-tonsillitis is one of the diseases that pediatricians and general practitioners most frequently experienced and only a small percentage of patients (20%-30% of pediatric patients, even less in adults) are actually suffering from pharyngo-tonsillitis by group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS). Also three quarters of pharyngitis patients have been treated with inappropriate antibiotics even these patients have viral infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the rapid antigen detection test (RADT) on the percentage of antibiotic prescriptions amongst patients with sore throat at a primary health care center in rural area.
Methods: Retrospective Cohort Study was designed to compare antibiotic prescription in patients with sore throats in two groups, one with the use of RADT and other with the clinical desicions of physicians. The x2 test was used between two nominal variables to assess the impact of RADT on antibiotic prescription. For comparison of more than two independent variables, the ANOVA test was used and to identify the differences between groups, the Post-Hoc test was processed.
Results: Of the 580 patients, the avarage age of the study population was 25.8 years old while the median age was 21 years (min.=3, max.=65). There was a significant difference between two groups who had tested with RADT or not in terms of antibiotic prescription (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between 3-14 years of age and 15-44 years of age (p = 0.001) as well as 3-14 years of age and 45-65 years of age (p = 0.009), however there was no significant difference between 15-44 and 45-65 years of age (p = 1.00).
Conclusions: Using the RADT is truly effective in reducing the percentage of antibiotic prescriptions in our setting. We believe that, the tools like RADTs which are quickly results and easy to use are really useful in practising (particularly in rural area).
Keywords
References
- [1] Cots JM, Alos JI, Barcena M, Boleda X, Canada JL, Gomez N, et al. Recommendations for management of acute pharyngitis in adults. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2015;66:159-70.
- [2] Kim S. Optimal diagnosis and treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Infect Chemother 2015;47:202-4.
- [3] Agarwal M, Raghuwanshi SK, Asati DP. Antibiotic use in sore throat: are we judicious? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;67:267-70.
- [4] Bisno AL, Gerber MA, Gwaltney JM Jr, Kaplan EL, Schwartz RH. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:113-25.
- [5] Ayranci U, Akgun Y, Unluoglu I, Kiremitci A. Antibiotic prescribing patterns for sore throat infections in a University-based primary care clinic. Ann Saudi Med 2005;25:22-8.
- [6] Linder JA, Stafford RS. Antibiotic treatment of adults with sore throat by community primary care physicians: a national survey, 1989-1999. JAMA 2001;286:1181-6.
- [7] Ebell MH, Smith MA, Barry HC, Ives K, Carey M. Does this patient have strep throat? JAMA 2000;284:2912-8.
- [8] Regoli M, Chiappini E, Bonsignori F, Galli L, de Martino M. Update on the management of acute pharyngitis in children. Ital J Pediatr 2011;37:10.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Baki Derhem
*
0000-0002-6989-9873
Türkiye
Süleyman Özsarı
0000-0002-7160-3381
Türkiye
Selman Erturhan
This is me
0000-0001-5040-2639
Türkiye
Publication Date
May 4, 2019
Submission Date
January 9, 2018
Acceptance Date
April 18, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 5 Number: 3