Research Article

Comparison of laboratory and imaging methods associated with bone metabolism in patients with or without renal failure under the age of 45 years with elevated parathyroid hormone levels

Volume: 5 Number: 3 May 4, 2019
EN

Comparison of laboratory and imaging methods associated with bone metabolism in patients with or without renal failure under the age of 45 years with elevated parathyroid hormone levels

Abstract

Objectives: Although bone biopsy is considered the gold standard for the definitive diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy; it is not suitable for routine clinical practice due to its invasive nature. The present study was aimed to evaluate and compare the bone mineral status using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of patients with or without chronic kidney disease in young population with elevated parathyroid hormone levels.

Methods: This was a single center, cross-sectional, retrospective study conducted in patients younger than 45 years of age. The study was performed in the outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Patients with elevated parathyroid hormone levels were included.

Results: Among them, 29 had renal insufficiency, 158 had normal renal function. Measured bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and laboratory values were collected from patient files. The primary end point was to assess the efficiacy of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with or without renal failure. Except Z score at Ward’s triangle, all of the T and Z scores at lomber, femur neck, trochanteric, and intertrochanteric areas were found significantly lower in patients with chronic kidney disease compared to those without (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry seemed to be a reliable method for detection of osteoporosis in premenopausal female and male patients younger than 45 years of age with or without renal failure with elevated parathyroid hormone levels. 

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Eknoyan G, Lameire N, Barsoum R, Eckardt KU, Levin A, Levin N, et al. The burden of kidney disease: improving global outcomes. Kidney Int 2004;66:1310-4.
  2. [2] Ketteler M, Block GA, Evenepoel P, Fukagawa M, Herzog CA, McCann L, et al. Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder: Synopsis of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update. Ann Intern Med 2018;168:422-30.
  3. [3] Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 1995;17(5 Suppl):S505-11.
  4. [4] Malluche HH, Mawad HW, Monier-Faugere MC. Renal osteodystrophy in the first decade of the new millennium: analysis of 630 bone biopsies in black and white patients. J Bone Miner Res 2011;26:1368-76.
  5. [5] Miller PD. The role of bone biopsy in patients with chronic renal failure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3 Suppl 3:S140-50.
  6. [6] Fontaine MA, Albert A, Dubois B, Saint-Remy A, Rorive G. Fracture and bone mineral density in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol 2000;54:218-26.
  7. [7] Khan MI, Syed GM, Khan AI, Sirwal IA, Anwar SK, Al-Oufi AR, et al. Mean bone mineral density and frequency of occurrence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients on hemodialysis: a single-center study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2014;25:38-43.
  8. [8] Jannot M, Mac-Way F, Lapierre V, Lafage-Proust MH. The use of bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed microtomography in chronic kidney disease. J Nephrol 2017;30:635-43.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 4, 2019

Submission Date

January 23, 2018

Acceptance Date

March 21, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 5 Number: 3

AMA
1.Peynirci H, Ersoy C, Gürsoy V, et al. Comparison of laboratory and imaging methods associated with bone metabolism in patients with or without renal failure under the age of 45 years with elevated parathyroid hormone levels. Eur Res J. 2019;5(3):515-521. doi:10.18621/eurj.378720